Primary Care Providers Still Reluctant to Talk About CBD

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Edibles, beverages and other products made with cannabidiol (CBD) went mainstream years ago, as public attitudes about cannabis changed and retailers discovered there was a growing market for CBD products.

The same is not true for primary care providers, according to a new survey that found most doctors are still reluctant to recommend CBD to their patients because of doubts about its safety and effectiveness. CBD is a chemical compound in marijuana that does not produce euphoria, but is believed to reduce pain and improve other health conditions.  

In the online survey of 236 primary care providers (PCPs) affiliated with the Mayo Clinic Healthcare Network in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Florida and Arizona, doctors said CBD was frequently brought up during medical appointments, usually by patients. But those conversations didn’t last long, because most PCPs don’t feel they have enough knowledge about CBD and are skeptical about CBD marketing claims.

PCPs in states where marijuana is legal are more receptive to patients using CBD products, while PCPs in states where marijuana is still illegal are more concerned about CBD’s side effects. But regardless of its legal status, most PCPs believe CBD is ineffective for most conditions for which it is marketed, with chronic non-cancer pain and anxiety/stress being the exceptions.

“Results from this mixed methods study show that PCPs practicing in the U.S. rarely screen for or discuss CBD use with their patients and report several barriers to engage in proactive CBD-focused practice behaviors,” wrote lead author Pravesh Sharma, MD, a pediatric psychiatrist and substance use researcher at Mayo Clinic Health System.

In a second, much smaller study, Sharma and his colleagues conducted interviews with 14 PCPs and found a number of barriers that prevent an open dialogue about CBD, including lack of time, discomfort, low-quality evidence, and CBD being a low priority.

“Our study is the first in-depth report on PCP attitudes, experiences, and practice behaviors related to CBD. The findings of our study have the potential to significantly impact future PCP practice behaviors,” they concluded.

The U.S. market for legal cannabis has grown into a $29.6 billion industry, but not much has changed over the years in terms of its acceptance in the medical community. In a 2020 survey of over 1,000 primary care patients in Vermont, only 18% rated their doctor as a good source of information about cannabis. Nearly half of the patients surveyed had used cannabis in the last year, and most of them thought cannabis was helpful for pain, anxiety, depression, arthritis, sleep and nausea.

The effectiveness of CBD is somewhat murky, because CBD products are poorly regulated and vary so much in dose, quality and whether they also have THC. While CBD may be effective temporarily in relieving pain and other symptoms, some researchers are concerned about its long-term effects on children and adolescents.  

“In fact, although CBD is widely available as an unregulated supplement, we researchers know almost nothing about its effects on the developing brain. Of note, these harms apply not only to smoking, but also to ingesting, vaping or other ways of consuming cannabis or its extracts,” Hilary Marusak, PhD, a psychiatry professor at Wayne State University, said in a recent column.

“In my view, it’s important that consumers know these risks and recognize that not everything claimed in a label is backed by science. So before you pick up that edible or vape pen for stress, anxiety, or sleep or pain control, it’s important to talk to a health care provider about potential risks.”

Unfortunately, asking a doctor may not provide many answers.

Let’s Talk About Chronic Pain and Sex

By Ann Marie Gaudon, PNN Columnist

Do you remember that catchy song from the early 90’s by the hip hop group Salt-N-Pepa called “Let’s Talk About Sex”? I sure do and I still think it’s fun!

For many people, sexual activity and intimacy are incredibly important factors of living well, being happy, and feeling close to one another. But when chronic pain enters a life, those factors may take a big hit. People don’t talk enough – or at all – about living in pain and sexual intimacy.

Let’s talk now baby!

In my many years of being with people in pain, I’ve seen sex become a taboo subject. It can be denied not only to another, but to oneself as well. It gets complicated when the person in pain worries about their physical performance or if they can even engage in sexual activity without increasing their pain.

This most certainly affects self-esteem and confidence in the bedroom. Then we have a situation where everybody stops talking -- when they should be doing just that.

Why does sex matter if you have chronic pain?

It matters and can have a significant impact on your quality of life. Something amazing happens when you are the recipient of wanted sexual touching and intimacy. Your body will release endorphins, which are the body's natural pain reducers. You will feel better and happier, not to mention all those other good feelings you may experience.

The name endorphin comes from “endogenous morphine,” which means they come from inside the body and mimic the effects of morphine. For that reason alone, I tell my clients to have more sex if possible. And if they are single, to get busy masturbating. An orgasm is an orgasm, and your body doesn’t care how it gets there. Just get there.

In 2017 a functional MRI study was conducted measuring brain activity in women during orgasm. “Brain activity gradually increased leading up to orgasm, peaked at orgasm, and then decreased,” researchers found. This activation included many regions of the brain, including those that process rewarding experiences such as food and sex. 

Another study from 2013 shows that orgasm may have the ability to decrease or alleviate headache pain. Want better sleep? Have regular orgasms. Yet another study in 2015 showed the mediating effect of sexual activity on pain and depression for those suffering from low back pain.  

How are you going to have sex if you have back pain?

I found out that the clinical community was in contact regularly with Canadian Dr. Stuart McGill, Chief Scientific Officer for Backfitpro and a distinguished professor emeritus at Waterloo University. McGill is asked repeatedly by clinicians about couples who are celibate because of back pain. Are there any guidelines on sexual technique that can reduce the risk of more pain?

The challenge was on! Professor McGill and graduate student N. Sidorkewicz conducted the only study in the world that took real couples and measured their spine postures and muscle activity while engaged in various sexual positions. This was no small feat, considering the challenges of recruitment, instrumentation and developing an experimental protocol that satisfied the ethics research committee and requests from the medical community. 

The study measured muscle activity and 3D spine and body movements, using the very same technology that was used in the making of Avatar. The object was to create an atlas of sexual positions that did not trigger back pain.

Professor McGill has a short version of a sexual atlas in his book "Back Mechanic," which includes spine-sparing positions that enable sex for people with back problems. The book guides the reader through a self-assessment of their pain triggers. Then, based on the specific trigger, positions and movements are shown to consider and to avoid.

I am super impressed with this work and I only wish that we had guidelines for virtually every source of pain.

Are there other pain conditions that defy sexual activity?

You bet there are! One that comes to mind is pelvic floor dysfunction or PFD. I have known many people with this diagnosis. We all have a pelvic floor, whether you were born with a penis or vagina, and so no one is immune to PFD.

One female patient with this diagnosis -- more specifically “hypertonic pelvic floor muscles” -- told me that just a light touch and/or engorgement from arousal can be enough to create excruciating muscle spasms.

“Spasms beget spasms,” she said. “It is very, very painful and truly sad that we avoid intimacy. I have a Pavlovian response developed over many years of severe pain and flares that lasted for days.”

The forceful, rhythmic contractions that occur for anyone having an orgasm can set off a cascade of painful symptoms. Here are links two simple videos to explain male and female pelvic pain.

PFD is currently treated by specialized physical therapists and yes – there are success stories, thankfully.

How do I get busy?

As a person with any type of pain, you may need to get creative. You may need to adjust positions for yourself or your partner, as well as the time, day and even the environment. If you require minimum body movement, consider self-stimulation while lying beside your partner. Sex toys and lubricants also work wonders, whether you have a partner or are alone.

If being spontaneous is not in the plan, consider making intimate dates either with a partner or yourself. Above all, keep the communication open with your partner. It’s crucial that you understand each other and have realistic expectations without judgment.

If you’re wondering if you can share intimacy without the orgasm, the answer is yes! Orgasm is only one aspect of sexual intimacy, and you can connect and feel great in plenty of other ways.

There comes a time in many couple relationships when sexual intercourse isn’t an option, due to physical, emotional or mental health. When this occurs, there are many alternatives to consider. Make a list for yourself, considering your unique needs, which will support and care for your pained body no matter what stage in life you are in. 

Ann Marie Gaudon is a registered social worker and psychotherapist in the Waterloo region of Ontario, Canada with a specialty in chronic pain management.  She has been a chronic pain patient for over 30 years and works part-time as her health allows. For more information about Ann Marie's counseling services, visit her website. 

FDA Head Says Drug Shortages ‘Out of Our Control’

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

With drug shortages in the U.S. near record levels, the head of the Food and Drug Administration says there is little his agency can do to ease shortages, particularly those involving generic drugs.

“We wish that we could fix all these things, but we don't make the medicines and we can't tell someone that they must make medicines. There are some things that are out of our control,” FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said in an interview with Medscape.  

There are currently 207 medications in short supply, according to the FDA’s drug shortage list, but the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) has a much higher estimate of over 300 active drug shortages, the most since 2014.

Shortages of generic medications used to treat cancer and attention deficit disorder (ADHD) have gotten the most attention, but there are also emerging shortages of generic oxycodone and other opioid pain medications. About 90% of prescribed drugs in the U.S. are low-cost generics.

“And this has caused a big problem, where a number of generic drugs are in shortage at any given time, because there's not enough profit for a company to say they want to go into the business of making that drug,” said Califf.

Teva Pharmaceutical, one of the world’s largest manufacturers of generic drugs, announced last month that it would change its business model to focus on more profitable branded drugs. Teva has already informed the FDA that it was discontinuing production of 30, 15, and 5 mg tablets of generic oxycodone.  

Another generic drug maker, Perrigo Pharmaceuticals, recently notified the FDA that it was stopping production of a cough syrup made with hydrocodone.

Pain patients have had trouble for years getting prescriptions filled for opioids, but the problem appears to have gotten more acute in recent months – and not just for generic opioids. Joy CobbWilliams told PNN she has trouble getting prescriptions filled for OcyContin, a branded formulation of oxycodone that she’s been taking for nearly a decade for chronic back pain.

“Month after month I run out of my medication while I wait for the pharmacy to get more. Some months I wait three or four days and other months I wait almost two weeks. The pain I suffer is unbearable,” she said. “Something needs to be done. We have got to do better for the patients suffering and not abusing the medication. This is the United States and there should be no reason someone suffering should have to wait days to weeks to get their 10mg OxyContin.” 

Kim Luarks told us she’s had problems with her pharmacy running out of fentanyl patches and Xtampza ER (oxycodone). She’s been on opioids for 20 years due to chronic back pain. 

“Here I sit, still waiting and have been without any long-acting opioid for (7 days) and not feeling too hot,” she said. “This could be detrimental to my life, let alone my heart and lungs that are already damaged due to the doctors just throwing pain meds at me in the early 2000’s. I've been through all the changes and federal regulations causing this nonsense.” 

The Drug Enforcement Administration, in consultation with the FDA, determines the annual production quotas for opioids and other controlled substances. Despite Califf’s contention that drug shortages are “out of our control,” it was the FDA that advised the DEA that demand for Schedule II opioids such as oxycodone would fall by 5.3% in 2023. 

DEA adopted the FDA’s recommendations and reduced the supply of opioids for the seventh consecutive year, saying it would be “sufficient to meet all legitimate needs.” Since their peak in 2013, DEA production quotas have fallen by 65% for oxycodone and 73% for hydrocodone.

In his interview with Medscape, Califf suggested that some medications are now in short supply not because of production quotas, but because they are prescribed to people who don’t really need them. He said stronger medical guidelines may be needed to discourage doctors from overprescribing.   

“If only the people that needed these drugs got them, there probably wouldn't be a shortage. There's a large amount of use which is on the margins. And this is why I say we need better clinical standards,” Califf said.

“But having said all that, we're working with the DEA frequently as they try to work out what the quotas are. And we're working with the companies to optimize production. So that shortage should go away. It's better now than it was a few months ago, and it's going to continue to get better.”

Studying Natural Opioids Could Lead to New Non-Addictive Analgesics

By Dr. John Streicher, University of Arizona

Opioid drugs such as morphine and fentanyl are like the two-faced Roman god Janus: The kindly face delivers pain relief to millions of sufferers, while the grim face drives an opioid abuse and overdose crisis that claimed nearly 70,000 lives in the U.S. in 2020 alone.

Scientists like me who study pain and opioids have been seeking a way to separate these two seemingly inseparable faces of opioids. Researchers are trying to design drugs that deliver effective pain relief without the risk of side effects, including addiction and overdose.

One possible path to achieving that goal lies in understanding the molecular pathways opioids use to carry out their effects in your body.

What Are Natural Opioids?

The opioid system in your body is a set of neurotransmitters your brain naturally produces that enable communication between neurons and activate protein receptors. These neurotransmitters include small protein-like molecules like enkephalins and endorphins. These molecules regulate a tremendous number of functions in your body, including pain, pleasure, memory, the movements of your digestive system, and more.

Opioid neurotransmitters activate receptors that are located in a lot of places in your body, including pain centers in your spinal cord and brain, reward and pleasure centers in your brain, and throughout the neurons in your gut. Normally, opioid neurotransmitters are released in only small quantities in these exact locations, so your body can use this system in a balanced way to regulate itself.

The problem comes when you take an opioid drug like morphine or fentanyl, especially at high doses, for a long time. These drugs travel through the bloodstream and can activate every opioid receptor in your body. You’ll get pain relief through the pain centers in your spinal cord and brain. But you’ll also get a euphoric high when those drugs hit your brain’s reward and pleasure centers, and that could lead to addiction with repeated use. When the drug hits your gut, you may develop constipation, along with other common opioid side effects.

Targeting Opioid Signals

How can scientists design opioid drugs that won’t cause side effects?

One approach my research team and I take is to understand how cells respond when they receive a message from an opioid neurotransmitter. Neuroscientists call this process opioid receptor signal transduction. Just as neurotransmitters are a communication network within your brain, each neuron also has a communication network that connects receptors to proteins within the neuron.

When these connections are made, they trigger specific effects like pain relief. So, after a natural opioid neurotransmitter or a synthetic opioid drug activates an opioid receptor, it activates proteins within the cell that carry out the effects of the neurotransmitter or the drug.

Opioid signal transduction is complex, and scientists are just starting to figure out how it works. However, one thing is clear: Not every protein involved in this process does the same thing. Some are more important for pain relief, while some are more important for side effects like respiratory depression or the decrease in breathing rate that makes overdoses fatal.

So what if we target the “good” signals like pain relief and avoid the “bad” signals that lead to addiction and death? Researchers are tackling this idea in different ways. In fact, in 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first opioid drug based on this idea, oliceridine, as a painkiller with fewer respiratory side effects.

However, relying on just one drug has downsides. That drug might not work well for all people or for all types of pain. It could also have other side effects that show up only later on. Plenty of options are needed to treat all patients in need.

Inhibiting a Protein Relieves Pain

My research team is targeting a protein called Heat shock protein 90, or Hsp90, which has many functions inside each cell. Hsp90 has been a hot target in the cancer field for years, with researchers developing Hsp90 inhibitors as a treatment for many cancer types.

We’ve found that Hsp90 is also really important in regulating opioid signal transduction. Blocking Hsp90 in the brain blocked opioid pain relief. However, blocking Hsp90 in the spinal cord increased opioid pain relief. Our recently published work uncovered more details on exactly how inhibiting Hsp90 leads to increased pain relief in the spinal cord.

Our work shows that manipulating opioid signaling through Hsp90 offers a path forward to improve opioid drugs. Taking an Hsp90 inhibitor that targets the spinal cord along with an opioid drug could improve the pain relief the opioid provides while decreasing its side effects. With improved pain relief, you can take fewer opioids and reduce your risk of addiction. We are currently developing a new generation of Hsp90 inhibitors that could help realize this goal.

There may be many paths to developing an improved opioid drug without the burdensome side effects of current drugs like morphine and fentanyl. Separating the kindly and grim faces of the opioid Janus could help provide the pain relief we need without addiction and overdose. 

John Streicher, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Arizona. Dr. Streicher has published over 70 peer-reviewed articles and is engaged in numerous drug discovery campaigns to create new analgesics. He receives funding from the National Institutes of Health, the Arizona Biomedical Research Commission, the Flinn Foundation, and the University of Arizona.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation and is republished with permission.

Medical Cannabis Effective but Expensive for New Zealanders

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Medical cannabis is very effective at relieving pain, improving sleep and reducing anxiety, according to researchers in New Zealand, who say government policies need to change to make cannabis cheaper and more accessible to Kiwis.

Researchers at the University of Otago, Victoria University and the University of Auckland surveyed and conducted interviews with 213 people who had prescriptions for cannabis under New Zealand’s medical cannabis program. Participants were asked about the quality of cannabis products they used and their effectiveness.

The study findings, published in the journal Drugs, Habits and Social Policy, show that nearly 96% reported that cannabis helped them with their medical conditions. Almost half (49%) said they were able to reduce or stop taking prescription drugs.

The most common therapeutic use of medical cannabis was pain relief and 96% of participants said it helped reduce their pain. Cannabis also helped users who had difficulty sleeping (97%) and those with mental health issues (98%).

Of the participants who took cannabis for other reasons, such as autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and difficulty eating, 98% found cannabis helpful.

"An important finding of the study was that participants either decreased or stopped their use of prescribed medicines, many of which were opioid based," said co-author Geoff Noller, PhD, a Research Fellow at Otago University's Dunedin School of Medicine. "This both reinforces that they experienced some actual effect from using cannabis in that they ceased or decreased other medications with recognized efficacy, and in the case of many of these other medications, they reduced their use of potentially more problematic medications.

"There is a place for both approaches, with the results of this study suggesting that cannabis products could have a role in treating patients with chronic pain and other conditions refractory to treatment by conventional means."

But many New Zealanders find medical cannabis difficult to obtain and rely on the black market. A recent study by the NZ Drug Foundation estimated that while over a quarter of a million Kiwis use cannabis for medical reasons, only 6% -- about 17,000 people -- obtained cannabis with a prescription.

Many doctors won’t prescribe medical cannabis and there are a limited number of products on the market, keeping prices high. The Foundation said CBD oil can cost a patient $150-350 per month, with other cannabis products costing even more.

"At present, current regulations appear to be creating problems for many New Zealanders who otherwise report positive benefits from their use of medicinal cannabis,” says Noller. "Specific barriers include cost, with currently available medicinal cannabis products being too expensive for many New Zealanders due to the compliance costs of production imposed by regulations, and also the lack of knowledge about it for physicians, leading to a reluctance to prescribe, in many cases."

To obtain medical cannabis, New Zealanders need a prescription from a doctor that spells out what cannabis products can be used and the amount. Medical cannabis can only be obtained legally from a doctor or pharmacy, although many Kiwis use a “Green Fairy” – a person who provides cannabis for a nominal fee.

Ketamine Nasal Spray May Be Effective Migraine Treatment

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

In recent years, ketamine has become a trendy drug for treating depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress and some types of chronic pain. Usually administered by infusion or injection, ketamine is a non-opioid analgesic that acts on the brain by putting patients into a temporary dream-like state.

A new study at Thomas Jefferson University suggests that ketamine may also be an effective treatment for chronic migraine. Several previous trials have shown that intravenous ketamine is effective for chronic headache, but it required close monitoring by a pain specialist to adjust the dose and monitor any side effects.

In the new study, researchers gave 169 migraine patients a ketamine nasal spray that they could use at home without supervision. Over two-thirds of the participants suffered from daily headaches and nearly 85% had tried over 3 types of migraine prevention drugs, with limited success.

The study findings, published in the journal Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, showed that nearly half the participants said the nasal spray was “very effective” and about 40% found it “somewhat effective.” Over a third said their quality of life was “much better.” 

Nearly 3 in 4 patients reported at least one side effect from ketamine, the most common being fatigue and double/blurred vision, followed by cognitive effects such as confusion, dissociation, vivid dreams and hallucinations. Most of the side effects were only temporary.

“In this descriptive study, intranasal ketamine served as an acute treatment for refractory chronic migraine by reducing headache intensity and improving quality of life with relatively tolerable adverse events. Most patients found intranasal ketamine effective and continued to use it despite these adverse events,” wrote lead author Michael Marmura, MD, Outpatient Director at the Jefferson Headache Center.

Marmura and his colleagues are cautious about who should use ketamine because of its potential for abuse. Ketamine has a short half-life of less than two hours, meaning patients may be tempted to use it repeatedly to keep chronic headaches at bay. Patients in this study used the nasal spray an average of just 6 times a month, but a small number (13.9%) used the spray daily.

“Clinicians should only consider the use of a potentially addictive medication such as ketamine for significantly disabled patients with migraine,” they warned. “(This) should be addressed carefully and individually, as some may respond only to repeated ketamine, while some may overuse it.”

In 2019, the FDA approved the use of Spravato, a nasal spray that contains a ketamine-like substance, for severe depression. Because of the risk of abuse, Spravato can only be administered in a doctor’s office, where patients can be observed for two hours after taking a dose. The use of such a spray to treat migraine would be considered an off-label use.

In addition to its medical uses, ketamine has long been known as a party drug – “Special K” -- because it can cause hallucinations and intense, dream-like states.

It didn’t take long for drug dealers to note the increase in ketamine’s popularity. Recent research published in JAMA shows that seizures of illicit ketamine in the U.S. have risen from 55 seizures in 2017 to 247 in 2022, a 350% increase. Because much of its was seized in powder form, researchers are concerned black market ketamine could easily be adulterated with illicit fentanyl.

My Life Is on the Line Due to Rx Opioid Shortages

By Christine Kucera, Guest Columnist

On May 24, I had my regularly scheduled pain management appointment. The prescription for my normal regimen of 10mg oxycodone was sent electronically to my local CVS pharmacy. About an hour later, I received a text from CVS saying they received the prescription from my doctor.

I followed up later through their automated system. That is the moment of shocking revelation when I learned that my prescription was not going to be filled on time, and that it may not be ready until a week after my fill date.

Utterly panicked, heart racing, thinking and speaking a mile a minute, I contacted the pharmacy. They confirmed they were out of 10mg oxycodone tablets.

“What am I supposed to do?” I asked. A woman who I don’t know replied that I should try contacting other pharmacies.

Really? I can’t do that. Pharmacies won’t tell me, the patient, if they have a supply of a controlled substance. So she looked it up and said it looks like “X” pharmacy has it and that I should have my doctor send the prescription there. Unfortunately, by the time my provider received the message, it was too late.

I made multiple calls to another pharmacy and they were extremely rude. I called my pharmacy again. This time I spoke with a pharmacist that knew me. He was very understanding, as we discussed what to do next.

CHRISTINE KUCERA

We came up with a plan. He said to have my doctor send him a prescription for 5mg oxycodone. I immediately emailed my provider about the shortage and asked him to send a new prescription for 5mg, since they were out of 10mg tablets.

It was a very long night and I was extremely anxious waiting for a reply from my provider. As a long-term opioid patient of 30 years with intractable pain, I’ve been through the unimaginable, especially after the CDC published its first opioid guideline. Since 2016, I’ve been force tapered to suboptimal treatment levels, denied pain medication during multiple hospitalizations, and told to take Tylenol.

A surgeon even used prescription fentanyl on me during an interventional procedure after being told it doesn’t work on me – leaving me awake and screaming during the procedure. That’s just to name a few examples. Believe me, there are many more.

My thoughts are racing out of control. I can’t do this anymore. I can’t live life with unrelenting, unmanaged pain all day, every day. I’m barely holding on now, trying hard not give up hope. It’s not easy living in a body that’s under assault from an invisible invader, leaving my entire body riddled with rare diseases, along with severe bone, nerve, connective tissue and organ pain.

As a person with severe medically induced PTSD, I can fully recall all of the previous times I was forced off my managed regime of opiate medication. This time it’s going to be at the hands of the DEA, which has intentionally created shortages of oxycodone.

Next day arrives, a new prescription for 5mg is sent and I sigh with relief. It was short lived. Another pharmacist said my insurance company won’t cover the 5mg substitute without prior authorization. Completely losing control of my emotions, I asked why do I need another prior authorization?  My daily limit of 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) didn’t change, just the dose of the tablets

“It’s because of daily quantity limits,” the pharmacist replied.

Are you freaking serious?  I’m out of oxycodone as of today and you’re saying I can’t have 2 weeks of a substitute because there is no supply anywhere of 10mg and my insurance has quantity limits on 5mg doses?  I was angry and upset. This is so wrong! What am I supposed to do?

To that, the pharmacist says, “You can pay out of pocket.”

I didn’t have a choice, although I knew what happens from paying out of pocket with cash and sending prescriptions to new pharmacies. Those are red flags for prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs).

What’s next CDC and DEA? You’ve fabricated the great Opioid Lie and created policies that affect all pain care in all settings. Created new burdens for disabled and chronically ill patients. Created an opioid guideline that doesn’t allow for individualized treatment and places limits on prescriptions. You’ve shackled doctors with no options but to provide inadequate pain care or abandon patients altogether.

Now patients and their providers are having to deal with DEA created shortages of essential medicines. This has got to stop! Pain patients have never been the driver behind the overdose crisis. Anti-opioid prohibition policies are harming, torturing and killing U.S. citizens.

What do I do? There are no protections or even a set of procedures in place to assist patients and providers when there are shortages of controlled substances. It really is a nightmare situation. I feel helpless. The shortage is not my fault, the restrictions have gone too far, and my life is on the line.

Christine Kucera lives with psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthropy, spondylitis, polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, degenerative joint disease, dermatomyositis, mixed connective tissue disease, spinal radiculopathy, hypoparathyroidism, rare endocrine tumors, psoriasis, endometriosis stage IV, pelvic adhesive disease, and other painful conditions. 

Prior to becoming disabled, Christine was a healthcare research systems developer and analyst for federally funded CMS, AHRQ, and NIH grants and programs. 

Do you have a “My Story” to share? Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories about living with pain and treating it. We are particularly interested in your experiences dealing with current drug shortages. Send your stories to editor@painnewsnetwork.org.

12 Most Common Symptoms of Long Covid

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Since the first cases started appearing in 2020, medical experts have been baffled by Long Covid, a poorly understood disorder that causes chronic fatigue, insomnia, brain fog and dozens of other symptoms long after the initial infection with COVID-19.

The symptoms vary so much from person to person that identifying the cause is difficult. Is it Long Covid? Fibromyalgia? Chronic fatigue syndrome? Lyme disease? Or just a bad case of the flu?   

A new study led by the National Institutes of Health's RECOVER Initiative has identified the 12 most common symptoms of Long Covid, with the goal of creating a working definition of the condition to help make it easier to diagnose and treat.

"This study is an important step toward defining Long Covid beyond any one individual symptom," said lead author Leora Horwitz, MD, director of the Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science at NYU Langone Health. "This definition — which may evolve over time — will serve as a critical foundation for scientific discovery and treatment design."

Horwitz and her colleagues studied survey data from 9,764 adult volunteers from across the country. Nearly 90% had been infected with Covid. Some made complete recoveries, while others had symptoms of Long Covid – known technically as postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). About 23% of participants with a prior Covid infection met the working definition for Long Covid.

The study findings, published in JAMA, examined 37 symptoms across multiple body areas and organs. Researchers then applied statistical analysis to identify the 12 symptoms that someone with Long Covid is most likely to have: post-exertional malaise, fatigue, brain fog, dizziness, gastrointestinal symptoms, heart palpitations, issues with sexual desire, loss of smell or taste, thirst, chronic cough, chest pain, and abnormal movements.

By assigning points to each of the 12 symptoms, researchers gave each participant a PASC score based on their combination of symptoms. Some symptoms appeared at higher rates than others, with malaise and fatigue being the most prominent, occurring in nearly 90% of cases.

Frequency of Long Covid Symptoms

SOURCE: JAMA

"Now that we're able to identify people with Long Covid, we can begin doing more in-depth studies to understand the mechanisms at play," said coauthor Andrea Foulkes, ScD, Principal Investigator of the RECOVER Data Resource Core. "These findings set the stage for identifying effective treatment strategies for people with Long Covid — understanding the biological underpinnings is going to be critical to that endeavor."

The researchers found that Long Covid was more common and severe in participants who were infected before the Omicron strain emerged in late 2021. People who were unvaccinated and those with multiple Covid infections were also more likely to have severe symptoms.

Researchers identified four subgroups of patients with different clusters of symptoms. Some clusters spanned multiple organs, such as the heart, lung and brain, suggesting that a body-wide reaction to the virus may occur in some people with Long Covid.

As of May 2023, more than 100 million Americans have been infected with COVID-19, with experts estimating that about 6 percent of those infected with the virus continue to experience Long Covid symptoms.

Drug Distributor Vows to Fight DEA

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The fourth-largest drug distributor in the U.S. is vowing to fight efforts by the Drug Enforcement Administration to strip it of its license to sell opioids and other controlled substances to pharmacies, hospitals and health systems in 27 states.

Such a move by the DEA, if carried out, would not only put Morris & Dickson out of business but could exacerbate already tight supplies of pain medication and drugs used to treat cancer and attention deficit disorder (ADHD). The company said it would “vigorously appeal” the license revocation and seek a stay in federal court.

“We strongly believe any attempt to revoke our registration would be unwarranted and unjustified. Most importantly, any decision the DEA makes will not disrupt our operations. Business will continue as usual, and orders will continue to go out on time,” the Louisiana-based company said in a statement on its website.

The DEA announced Friday that it would revoke Morris & Dickson’s license, but allowed 90 days before the order takes effect. The action stems from a DEA investigation that identified thousands of suspiciously large orders for oxycodone and hydrocodone that the company sold to independent pharmacies in Louisiana from 2014 to 2018. In some cases, according to the DEA, the pharmacies were allowed to purchase six times the amount of opioids that they would normally order.

The DEA suspended Morris & Dickson’s license in 2018, but then delayed making a final decision on revoking it, which allowed the company to continue to operate. That five year delay came to a sudden end this week, after the Associated Press reported that the DEA failed to stop the company from “shipping highly addictive painkillers,” even after a judge recommended that its license be revoked for its “cavalier disregard” of the suspicious orders.

Further complicating the case is that a top DEA official retired from the agency in 2017 and went to work for Morris & Dickson, leading efforts at the company to improve the way it identifies and reports suspicious orders. Louis Milione “unretired” in 2021 and went back to work at the DEA as principal deputy administrator.    

Morris & Dickson spent millions of dollars improving its compliance system, but that was not enough for DEA Administrator Ann Milgram, who has come under increasing fire for her personnel decisions at the agency.

“Respondent (Morris & Dickson) has not adequately convinced the Agency that it can be entrusted with a registration — its acceptance of responsibility did not prove that it or its principals understand the full extent of their wrongdoing, the effect that it had on the Agency and the American public, and the potential harm that it caused. It was Respondent's burden to prove that it could be entrusted to protect the public interest in maintaining a DEA registration — and it has failed to do so,” Milgram said in her 68-page order.

Milgram said she would deny any application by Morris & Dickson to renew or modify its registration, and said her order would become final on August 28, 2023.

The company, however, said it would continue its “ongoing discussion” with the DEA to keep its license.

“Morris & Dickson is grateful to the DEA Administrator for delaying the effective date of the Order to allow time to settle these old issues, which has been our goal since this started years ago,” the company said. “We remain confident we can achieve an outcome that safeguards the supply chain for all of our healthcare partners and the communities they serve.”

That supply chain has been severely strained in recent years, not only by the pandemic, but by DEA actions that reduced the supply of opioids and other controlled substances.

In March, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists added oxycodone to its list of drug shortages, after generic drug makers Amneal, Camber and Rhodes Pharmaceuticals reported they were running out of some doses of oxycodone tablets.

This month Teva Pharmaceutical said it would discontinue production of immediate release oxycodone and scale back its generic drug business to focus on more profitable medications.

The nation’s three largest drug distributors – McKesson, AmerisourceBergen and Cardinal Health — have already imposed strict limits on the amount of opioids and other controlled substances they sell as part of a $21 billion opioid litigation settlement. Whether they would be able to take on additional customers and supply them with essential medications that Morris & Dickson now provides is an open question.

“It’s hard to say what the overall impact would be. I don’t know how many pharmacies or hospitals are only serviced by Morris & Dickson,” says Erin Fox, PharmD, Senior Pharmacy Director at University of Utah Health, who has been tracking drug shortages for over 20 years. “They would have to establish contracts with another wholesaler. If pharmacies and hospitals have a secondary wholesaler, then they should be able to access opioids to dispense for patients.”  

Denials of Health Insurance Claims Are Rising

By Elisabeth Rosenthal, KFF Health News

Millions of Americans in the past few years have run into this experience: filing a health care insurance claim that once might have been paid immediately but instead is just as quickly denied.

If the experience and the insurer’s explanation often seem arbitrary and absurd, that might be because companies appear increasingly likely to employ computer algorithms or people with little relevant experience to issue rapid-fire denials of claims — sometimes bundles at a time — without reviewing the patient’s medical chart. A job title at one company was “denial nurse.”

It’s a handy way for insurers to keep revenue high — and just the sort of thing that provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were meant to prevent. Because the law prohibited insurers from deploying previously profit-protecting measures such as refusing to cover patients with preexisting conditions, the authors worried that insurers would compensate by increasing the number of denials.

And so, the law tasked the Department of Health and Human Services with monitoring denials both by health plans on the Obamacare marketplace and those offered through employers and insurers. It hasn’t fulfilled that assignment. Thus, denials have become another predictable, miserable part of the patient experience, with countless Americans unjustly being forced to pay out-of-pocket or, faced with that prospect, forgoing needed medical help.

A recent KFF study of ACA plans found that even when patients received care from in-network physicians — doctors and hospitals approved by these same insurers — the companies in 2021 nonetheless denied, on average, 17% of claims. One insurer denied 49% of claims in 2021; another’s turndowns hit an astonishing 80% in 2020. Despite the potentially dire impact that denials have on patients’ health or finances, data shows that people appeal only once in every 500 cases.

Sometimes, the insurers’ denials defy not just medical standards of care but also plain old human logic. Here is a sampling collected for the KFF Health News-NPR “Bill of the Month” joint project.

• Dean Peterson of Los Angeles said he was “shocked” when payment was denied for a heart procedure to treat an arrhythmia, which had caused him to faint with a heart rate of 300 beats per minute. After all, he had the insurer’s preapproval for the expensive ($143,206) intervention. More confusing still, the denial letter said the claim had been rejected because he had “asked for coverage for injections into nerves in your spine” (he hadn’t) that were “not medically needed.” Months later, after dozens of calls and a patient advocate’s assistance, the situation is still not resolved.

• An insurer’s letter was sent directly to a newborn child denying coverage for his fourth day in a neonatal intensive care unit. “You are drinking from a bottle,” the denial notification said, and “you are breathing on your own.” If only the baby could read.

• Deirdre O’Reilly’s college-age son, suffering a life-threatening anaphylactic allergic reaction, was saved by epinephrine shots and steroids administered intravenously in a hospital emergency room. His mother, utterly relieved by that news, was less pleased to be informed by the family’s insurer that the treatment was “not medically necessary.”

As it happens, O’Reilly is an intensive-care physician at the University of Vermont. “The worst part was not the money we owed,” she said of the $4,792 bill. “The worst part was that the denial letters made no sense — mostly pages of gobbledygook.” She has filed two appeals, so far without success.

Some denials are, of course, well considered, and some insurers deny only 2% of claims, the KFF study found. But the increase in denials, and the often strange rationales offered, might be explained, in part, by a ProPublica investigation of Cigna — an insurance giant, with 170 million customers worldwide.

ProPublica’s investigation, published in March, found that an automated system, called PXDX, allowed Cigna medical reviewers to sign off on 50 charts in 10 seconds, presumably without examining the patients’ records.

Decades ago, insurers’ reviews were reserved for a tiny fraction of expensive treatments to make sure providers were not ordering with an eye on profit instead of patient needs.

These reviews — and the denials — have now trickled down to the most mundane medical interventions and needs, including things such as asthma inhalers or the heart medicine that a patient has been on for months or years. What’s approved or denied can be based on an insurer’s shifting contracts with drug and device manufacturers rather than optimal patient treatment.

Automation makes reviews cheap and easy. A 2020 study estimated that the automated processing of claims saves U.S. insurers more than $11 billion annually.

But challenging a denial can take hours of patients’ and doctors’ time. Many people don’t have the knowledge or stamina to take on the task, unless the bill is especially large or the treatment obviously lifesaving. And the process for larger claims is often fabulously complicated.

The Affordable Care Act clearly stated that HHS “shall” collect the data on denials from private health insurers and group health plans and is supposed to make that information publicly available. (Who would choose a plan that denied half of patients’ claims?) The data is also supposed to be available to state insurance commissioners, who share with HHS the duties of oversight and trying to curb abuse.

To date, such information-gathering has been haphazard and limited to a small subset of plans, and the data isn’t audited to ensure it is complete, according to Karen Pollitz, a senior fellow at KFF and one of the authors of the KFF study. Federal oversight and enforcement based on the data are, therefore, more or less nonexistent.

HHS did not respond to requests for comment for this article.

The government has the power and duty to end the fire hose of reckless denials harming patients financially and medically. Thirteen years after the passage of the ACA, perhaps it is time for the mandated investigation and enforcement to begin.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

FDA Expands Use of Spinal Cord Stimulators to More Types of Back Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration continues to expand the use of spinal cord stimulators, despite a growing body of research that questions the safety and effectiveness of the devices.

This month the FDA approved the use of Abbott’s spinal cord stimulators for the treatment of chronic back pain in people who are unable to get corrective surgery – known as non-surgical back pain -- because they are too medically frail or have numerous degenerative disc problems. Those patients are usually treated with pain medication, physical therapy or spinal injections.

FDA approval was granted after a clinical study showed that SCS devices equipped with Abbott's BurstDR technology provided significant pain relief, better physical function, and improved quality of life in 200 patients with non-surgical back pain. The devices are surgically placed near the spine and emit mild electrical impulses to disrupt pain signals before they reach the brain. 

Participants in the study had chronic and disabling back pain for an average of nearly 13 years before getting the devices.

"We have struggled with how to treat people who weren't considered a good surgical candidate because we didn't have clear, data-driven treatment options for non-surgical back pain," Timothy Deer, MD, CEO of the Spine and Nerve Centers of the Virginias, said in an Abbott press release. "This new indication for Abbott's SCS devices, together with BurstDR stimulation, allows physicians the ability to identify and treat a new group of people, providing them with relief from chronic back pain."

BurstDR stimulation uses mild electrical pulses — or bursts — without creating an uncomfortable tingling sensation in the spine known as paresthesia.  All of Abbott's SCS devices use BurstDR technology.

Nine out of ten patients who received BurstDR therapy experienced significantly better function or pain relief, with pain levels reduced an average of nearly 70 percent. The improvements were sustained 12 months after the devices were implanted.

"This FDA expanded indication approval for our SCS devices is a significant step forward in Abbott's goal to provide treatment access to those who suffer daily with chronic back pain but are not eligible for corrective surgery," said Pedro Malha, vice president of neuromodulation for Abbott.

SCS devices were long considered a treatment of last resort for people with severe back, neck and leg pain, but in recent years the FDA has expanded use of the devices for conditions such as painful diabetic neuropathy. The devices are often promoted as safer alternatives than opioid pain medication.

Recent research, however, has raised questions about the safety, efficacy and long-term benefits of the devices. A recent Cochrane review concluded the stimulators work no better than a placebo for treating chronic low back pain, and provide little or no improvement in quality of life.  In a review of 13 clinical trials, researchers found little clinical data on the long-term effectiveness of SCSs, and noted that most of the studies lasted less than a month, were poorly blinded, or funded by device makers.

A 2018 study by investigative journalists found that SCSs have some of the worst safety records of medical devices tracked by the FDA.

A 2020 FDA review of adverse events involving stimulators found that nearly a third were reports of unsatisfactory pain relief. Other common adverse events are nerve damage, infections, and device malfunctions that may lead to further surgeries.

A 2022 study found that patients who get the devices did not reduce their use of opioids, and continued getting medical procedures such as injections, epidurals and radiofrequency ablation.

Regular Exercise Boosts Pain Tolerance

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

People who remain physically active over a long period have much greater pain tolerance than those who are sedentary and don’t get much exercise, according to a large new study in Norway.

While exercise has long been touted as a way to ease or even prevent chronic pain, this particular study falls short in actually proving it, which we’ll get to later.

Researchers at University Hospital of North Norway analyzed data from 10,732 adults who participated in a large health survey -- the Tromsø Study --- that is conducted periodically in Norway. The researchers used data from two rounds of the study that were conducted seven years apart, one in 2007-2008 and the other in 2015-2016.

Most of the participants (79%) said they were either sedentary or engaged in only light exercise, while the remainder reported moderate or vigorous activity. About a third of the participants (32%) said they had chronic pain,

Pain tolerance was assessed by how long they could keep a hand immersed in cold water that was a few degrees above freezing (3 degrees Celsius or 37.4 degrees Fahrenheit).

The study findings, published in the journal PLOS ONE, showed that participants who reported vigorous physical activity in either round had significantly more pain tolerance than the couch potatoes who maintained a sedentary lifestyle in both rounds.

The good news for couch potatoes is that pain tolerance can be improved. As the chart below demonstrates, people who boosted their physical activity (PA) over time were able to keep their hands in cold water for longer periods, suggesting they have more pain tolerance.

source: plos one

“In summary, these findings suggest that becoming or remaining active at a level above being sedentary, or making a positive change in activity level, over time is associated with higher pain tolerance as opposed to being sedentary or making a negative change,” researchers reported. “Whatever you do, the most important thing is that you do something!”

Interestingly, having chronic pain did not influence the findings one way or another. Researchers found that chronic pain “does not significantly interfere” with the relationship between physical activity and pain tolerance. However, they were hesitant to draw a conclusion from that, saying the findings “might look different” if pain conditions were broken down into different diagnostic groups, instead of under one broad term under the label “chronic pain.”      

Even moderate physical activity is known to stimulate the production of endocannabinoids – cannabis-like substances naturally produced by the body -- which can relieve pain and inflammation. Regular exercise can also help us lose weight, reduce the risk of heart disease, and boost overall health.  

Why Changes at Teva Could Worsen Rx Opioid Shortages

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A change in the business model of one of the world’s largest manufacturers of generic drugs could lead to further shortages of opioids and other medications in the United States, according to an industry expert.

Last week Israel-based Teva Pharmaceutical Industries said it would reduce its production of generics from 80% of its drug portfolio to 60% over the next few years. Teva’s CEO says the company plans to focus on more profitable branded drugs as part of its “pivot to growth.”

“The drugs we’re pulling out of are drugs which are low-margin,” CEO Richard Francis told Bloomberg.

Teva has not publicly identified which generic drugs it will stop producing, but said it would “very carefully” avoid dropping any medications that are already in short supply.

“We don’t want to let the pharmacists, the wholesalers and the patients down. We want to make sure they always have their drug when they’re looking for it,” Francis said in an interview with Endpoints News.

But Teva has already moved to reduce its production of generic oxycodone, informing the Food and Drug Administration earlier this month that it would discontinue producing 30, 15, and 5 mg tablets of immediate release oxycodone. Teva did not respond to multiple requests from PNN to explain the reasons for the discontinuation.

The FDA does not currently list oxycodone on its drug shortage database, but the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) does.

As PNN reported, ASHP added oxycodone to its nationwide list of drug shortages in March, with generic drug makers Amneal, Camber and Rhodes Pharmaceuticals reporting shortages of 5, 15, 20 and 30 mg oxycodone tablets.

“They are a large producer and other companies may not be able to make up the difference. I think it really will result in shortages.”

— Dr. Erin Fox, University of Utah Health

“I know that (Teva’s) CEO came out with a statement saying that they wouldn't leave the market for products that are in short supply, but it hasn't exactly been a great market overall. The overall capacity of just the generic market is very difficult. When you look at controlled substances, that gets even more difficult,” says Erin Fox, PharmD, Senior Pharmacy Director at University of Utah Health, which tracks drug shortages for the ASHP.

“They (Teva) are a large producer and other companies may not be able to make up the difference. I think it really will result in shortages.”

As an example of how tight the supply of opioids and other controlled substances is, Fox says the University of Utah Health system reached out to its drug wholesaler to let them know that it was adding 50 new beds to its cancer clinic and would be needing more pain medication and other drugs to treat the extra patients. The answer it received was not reassuring.

“It's mostly opioids that we anticipate needing more of. And the wholesaler said, ‘Well, let's just wait until we start receiving your orders to increase the amounts that you're going to buy,’” Fox told PNN. “I think the wholesalers’ settlement that they've done has really limited the amount of products that pharmacies can access. Even if you have the patients, it can be very difficult to increase the amount that you're ordering.”

Fox is referring to a $21 billion opioid litigation settlement that three large drug distributors reached with 46 states last year, which requires them to impose strict limits on the amount of opioids and other controlled substances they can supply to pharmacies in any given month. An unusually large order for opioids could result in a pharmacy getting red-flagged by a distributor and the order cancelled, regardless of patient needs.

“We're unable to be proactive. We're trying to think ahead. And we don't want to have that situation where we we're getting very close to running out or not having enough. That's basically what our wholesaler says has to happen,” Fox explained.

DEA Production Cuts

Fox says years of cuts in production quotas by the Drug Enforcement Administration have also contributed to shortages. With opioids and some other controlled substances in tight supply, there is little margin for error or unexpected developments in the pharmaceutical industry – like Teva reducing its production of generics.

Keeping track of the drug supply is made more difficult because production quotas for each company are not disclosed by the DEA and there is little transparency in the business.

“What we don't have is the amount that the DEA is giving to each supplier. And then we also don't know the amount that each supplier is then manufacturing. Because we don't have that transparency, it's really hard to know,” Fox said. “Drug manufacturing is a business. And even though patients are at the end of it, these drug companies don't have to tell people why they're discontinuing something. They don't have to have to say what market share they had or if they think there might be a shortage. They can just stop at any time.”

Another issue is that DEA’s annual production quotas are not transferable from one company to another. That’s why Fox believes the changes at Teva are likely to worsen drug shortages.

“DEA assumes that everything is going perfectly with manufacturing, that no companies are having a glitch, and no companies are having a problem. And so one company might be having manufacturing problems, but still holding onto their quota. They can't necessarily give it to another company who's able to ramp up production,” she said.

“There’s just a lack of transparency. It's very hard. I've been monitoring drug shortages for over 20 years. Almost always, when a company quits, we end up with some kind of a shortage. Hopefully it won't be long term.”

Another factor that could be influencing Teva’s decision is the $4.25 billion nationwide settlement the company agreed to pay in opioid litigation last year. Teva’s production of generic and branded opioids dwarfed that of Purdue Pharma and other better known drug companies. Now heavily in debt, Teva may have decided that profits in a low-margin product like opioids are simply not worth the risk.      

FDA Authorizes Smartphone App for Fibromyalgia

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has authorized the marketing of the first smartphone-based digital therapy for fibromyalgia. The Stanza mobile app doesn’t relieve the physical pain of fibromyalgia, but is designed to help patients manage the anxiety, depression and other psychological symptoms that often come with fibromyalgia.

Fibromyalgia is a poorly understood condition characterized by widespread body pain, headaches, fatigue, insomnia and mood disorders. The FDA has approved only three medications for fibromyalgia -- duloxetine (Cymbalta), milnacipran (Savella), and pregabalin (Lyrica) – but many patients consider the drugs ineffective or have too many side effects.

“This represents a major milestone both for our company and the fibromyalgia patients we serve, and is a big step towards meaningfully addressing patient access barriers by making evidence-based, non-drug treatments available to more people,” said Mike Rosenbluth, CEO of Swing Therapeutics, the maker of Stanza.

“On top of dealing with the debilitating symptoms, fibromyalgia patients have been historically underserved and even stigmatized. Current FDA-approved medications, while offering moderate efficacy, are often accompanied by side effects.”  

The Stanza app provides training in acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a form of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), to help patients develop flexibility and resilience in coping with fibromyalgia. ACT teaches mindfulness strategies and behavioral changes to help people accept and manage their pain.

In a clinical trial, Stanza significantly reduced depression and anxiety in fibromyalgia patients, while improving their quality of life. About 80% of patients responded to Stanza therapy and the benefits were sustained for up to 12 months.

Stanza is designed to be used five to seven days per week, for about 15 to 20 minutes a day, over a 12-week period. After 12 weeks, the app can be used as needed.

Stanza is only available by prescription. It was first made available last year under the FDA’s Digital Health Enforcement Policy for Digital Health Devices. Swing Care, an online clinic that provides personalized treatment of fibromyalgia, includes Stanza as an option for patients in Texas. Swing Therapeutics anticipates that Stanza will also be available through Swing Care in other states later this year.

Staying Socially Connected Can Help With Chronic Pain

By Jill Suttie, Greater Good Science Center

Many people live with chronic pain. Whether it’s from injury or illness, chronic pain can affect a person’s mood, relationships, work productivity, and more, making it difficult to enjoy daily life.

Unfortunately, getting pain relief can be a complex process. One reason is that it involves both physiological and social-psychological factors — meaning, pain doesn’t just come from having a fever or breaking your arm, but other things happening in your brain, body, and environment. For example, your experience of pain can be lessened by things like distraction, listening to music, or practicing mindfulness meditation.

As researcher Laura Case of the University of California, San Diego, explains, “There’s no one-to-one relationship between activation of sensory nerves and your experience of pain or touch… Though there’s debate about which brain areas correspond to our final pain experience, all of the main players are interconnected with cognitive and emotional brain areas.”

Now a new study that she coauthored with Jennifer Baumgartner suggests another potential influence on pain: feeling socially connected.

A Sense of Belonging Helps

This new study reanalyzed measures collected in an earlier study, in which a group of chronic pain sufferers had been randomly assigned to an intervention shown to reduce pain (sleeping with a heavily weighted blanket) or to a control condition (sleeping with a slightly weighted blanket, which is considered non-therapeutic). After sleeping with their assigned blanket for a week, changes in people’s pain levels were assessed, and the two groups were compared to each other.

In the earlier study, the pain sufferers had also reported on their anxiety and depression symptoms, levels of loneliness, and sense of social connectedness—not how many social connections they had currently, but how generally close they were to other people and how strongly they experienced a sense of belonging. But these had not all been analyzed to see how they related to pain and pain relief from the blankets. That’s where the new study came in.

The new findings showed that people who were more socially connected experienced less pain than those who were less socially connected. After taking into account differences in expectations for pain relief and people’s initial pain levels, those who were socially disconnected felt more pain relief from the weighted blanket than from the lighter blanket, while more socially connected people received equal pain relief from both blankets.

For Baumgartner, these findings suggest that having a sense of belonging provides some level of protection against pain, regardless of any blanket intervention.

“Social support is really important for things that could potentially be threatening, such as stress or pain,” she says. “Having an internalized feeling of being connected with people has an effect on our physical sensations.”

Why would a sense of belonging help with pain? Neither Case nor Baumgartner is sure why.

However, in their study, people who were more socially connected had less anxiety, which could be a factor. Socially connected people probably feel safer and less anxious, says Baumgartner, because they know they can lean on others for support when they’re hurting. Less anxiety means less vigilance around unpleasant bodily sensations, which could decrease their experience of pain.

“Anxiety is strongly coupled with pain, exacerbating people’s surveillance of pain within their body,” she says. “So, having less anxiety is protective—no matter what intervention you receive.”

Case, who studies tactile sensations, says that positive social touch — like receiving a friendly hug or massage — has been shown to reduce pain sensation, and people who are more socially connected likely experience more of those types of touch. Someone who doesn’t have that in their lives much may crave soothing tactile pressure, which is why the weighted blankets can help somewhat.

“If you have difficulty feeling close to others, maybe there are some sensory ways to get around that and help your pain,” she says. “Deep pressure is calming, because it’s associated with the safety of being close to someone else, of being held and protected.”

The Power of a Big Hug

Surprisingly, feelings of depression didn’t seem to affect the relationship between social connection and pain, even though depression has been tied to pain in other research. While this study’s finding might prove to be an outlier, it could also suggest that the hyper vigilance accompanying anxiety is more impactful on pain than feeling down.

Either way, it appears that social connection matters when it comes to pain. However, that can’t be manipulated in an experiment. Baumgartner explains that this trait tends to develop early in childhood and may be tied to general attachment styles (secure, anxious, or avoidant). Since these are not easily changed, it’s good to have a useful, non-pharmacological treatment for pain relief in those without good social connectivity, like the weighted blanket.

“The weighted blanket doesn’t involve any sort of social situation at all, but it still seems to have the ability to help people, to some extent,” says Baumgartner. “Though there haven’t been enough rigorous studies done yet, I’m pretty optimistic that a weighted blanket could serve as an alternative or an adjunct to pain treatment—or maybe even a strategy to prevent people from getting chronic pain in the first place.”

Case says that it could substitute in some ways for what’s missing for people when they tend to be avoidant of others.

“Just anecdotally, people [in the study] found a weighted blanket tended to make them feel like they’re getting a big hug, and it’s relaxing and calming,” she says. “A weighted blanket isn’t a cure for chronic pain, and it’s not going to help everyone. But some people in our study did find it valuable.”

Case and Baumgartner’s study adds to a growing body of research showing how important social connectedness and social touch are for our health and well-being — something that’s been getting more attention in recent years. In fact, in a recent advisory report, the U.S. Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, argued that our country is facing a “loneliness epidemic” that is affecting our health and longevity and that we need to create more opportunities for people to connect and build a sense of belonging in their lives.

Now, we know that social connection may also help those who suffer from chronic pain.

“Psychosocial factors are not peripheral to someone’s sense of chronic pain; they are central,” Baumgartner says. “Connecting with people and seeking out positive, healthy connections within your social environment is critical.”

This article originally appeared on Greater Good, the online magazine of the Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley.