It’s Not Urgent and They Don’t Care

By Mia Maysack, PNN Columnist

There are no words to convey the extent that I, along with so many others, have endured medical trauma. It’s even more impossible for us to get those who haven't to understand what it's like or the toll that it takes.

A loved one of mine had an injury not too long ago that required a small dose of medical hoop jumping. Just the tip of the broken-healthcare-system-iceberg was enough to leave a lasting impression on them, to the extent they still haven't stopped complaining about it.

But when I attempted to express my own fresh experience with said iceberg, this same person described me as "too sensitive." That is dreadfully inaccurate, especially when you consider I've lived this way for over two decades and they had one adverse experience.

My aim is not to belittle or attempt competitive victimization. I understand how health problems impact us on different levels and in various ways. I simply find the lack of empathy -- yet the simultaneous expectation of it -- to be painfully fascinating.

Within the last few weeks, I've been hospitalized multiple times, essentially back-to-back for the same issue. That's part of what being chronically ill looks like. The difference between these recent visits, as opposed to all the others, is the spite I feel for providers who are supposed to be working for me.

I currently don’t have a primary care provider, so my only option when I have an urgent need is to go to a hospital emergency department. I was in one recently at two o’clock in the morning, freezing on a cot in an isolated exam room.

A nurse came in for the rundown as to why I was there, followed by a brief appearance from a doctor who didn't make eye contact or even face me. He kept his back turned while working on a computer.

The nurse proceeded to speak about me and my situation with Doctor Awesome, as if I was not even there. I interrupted their conversation, because I’ve already endured enough lack of bedside manner and respectfully expressed my concerns and wishes.  I asked for an exam and tests to ensure my medical issue wasn’t progressing, I also needed a prescription to relieve side effects from a medicine I was taking to manage my complications.

After laying all this out in a concise, professional manner, Dr. Awesome finally decides to turn around to face me and dryly asks, “So what brings you in tonight?”

Stunned, I politely responded that I’d previously been to this ER and was advised to return if needed. His reply was that my requests are more of a “clinic thing” and “weren’t necessary.” He then dismissed himself and I did not see him again for the hours I was left alone there. He did not come back to check on me before discharge or bother to report the results of my testing. No one did.

An assistant I hadn’t seen before eventually popped in and provided more warmth than anyone else I’d encountered, just by saying, “Awww, you do not look like you feel very well.” 

I thanked her for the acknowledgement and asked for an exam from anybody who was qualified -- it certainly didn’t need to be Dr. Awesome. She was appalled that I had to ask and left promptly to flag someone down.

So now another person I had never met and who didn’t bother introducing themselves, came in and spent less than a minute with me before they left.

At a different point in my journey, this sort of encounter would’ve completely shattered me, because of how low and how long I’ve been knocked down by those entrusted to aid in healing

Those days are over. Today, I’ll stop at nothing to pursue and obtain what’s in my best interests. Instead of feeling depleted after mistreatment like this, I internalize it as empowerment. I’ve made the decision to give up on them instead of myself, and to continue battling for the sake of my life quality. Even if that means fighting against the harm that they vowed not to inflict in the first place. 

Mia Maysack lives with chronic migraine, cluster headache and fibromyalgia. She is the founder of Keepin’ Our Heads Up, a Facebook advocacy and support group, and Peace & Love, a wellness and life coaching practice for the chronically ill. 

My Pain Marriage

By Mara Baer

Two years ago this month, I had major surgery to try to address the daily chronic pain that had been with me for seven years. Leading up to that surgery, I was bounced around from specialist to specialist, experiencing many failed attempts to treat my Thoracic Outlet Syndrome, a rare nerve entrapment condition that causes overwhelming nerve pain.

Because the surgery was unsuccessful, the looming anniversary date -- November 30th -- carries a lot of weight as I approach year 10 of my chronic pain journey.

Anniversaries are times of reflection, when we think about where we’ve been and where we are going, celebrate milestones, and commemorate paths taken. We acknowledge wedding anniversaries, work anniversaries, birthdays, deaths, and other important junctures in life.

There are also health recovery anniversaries celebrated by cancer survivors to honor their remissions and recovering addicts who mark their hard-earned sobriety. The anniversary of my surgery brings the same type of evaluation and introspection.

My husband Art and I commonly celebrate our wedding anniversary in a simple way with a nice dinner and a toast.

We just hit 17 years together and noted how much we’ve accomplished; bringing two beautiful kids into the world, making a big move from DC to Denver, and building our own little, special world.

We also reflected on the impact my chronic pain has had on our lives. I shared with him how I feel that I am in a relationship with my pain that is akin to a marriage -- often complex, at times emotional, and deeply reliant on compromise and understanding.

This relationship can feel like a third wheel in our marriage some days, taking over and getting in the way. This is something we both are working to address.    

Mara Baer and Art Maples

And, like a toxic relationship, the “pain marriage” can be all consuming. Chronic pain sufferers commonly report feeling a lack of control and that pain dominates daily life. I’m sure many readers can recall a personal relationship that felt this way.  Just remember that one bad relationship and how it made you feel when tensions were high. Angry. Frustrated. Sad. Helpless. Fearful. Depleted. This is how the pain relationship can feel for most chronic pain sufferers.

Most people in a challenging relationship will say that toxicity feeds greater toxicity, creating a vicious cycle. The pain marriage is no different. When I have been at my lowest due to pain, I found it impossible to have a positive outlook. I tried every ineffective playbook strategy, including disengaging or ignoring it (“pain, you are not there, you just aren’t there”); placating it (not moving, lying in bed, other unhealthy habits); and bargaining (“pain, I’ll do all the right things so you will just leave me”).

I am sure there are others. These strategies never seemed to work. Why? Because like in any relationship, masking or hiding from the raw truth will not be successful.  

All couples argue, and Art and I have had our share. I’ve learned that our greatest challenges come when we are not listening to each other. The words come out, but perhaps my interpretation of his words or his of mine are not the same as what we intended.

When we don’t hear each other, arguments can escalate quickly. It’s the same with pain. When I sense my pain and try to ignore it, I may not be really hearing what my body is telling me.

But when I acknowledge pain’s role in my life and how I feel about it, I can start to gain equal footing or control. Then it’s not about “winning” (like winning an argument), but about managing the dynamics between us.

It might sound odd that I’m referring to my pain in this way. But only when I started to accept pain’s presence could I start to change the nature of the relationship. This is why acknowledging that I am in a relationship with my pain is one of my chronic pain truths.

So as my surgery anniversary nears, I may not be toasting the journey, but I will be reflecting on the ups and downs of my pain struggle, and also celebrating my new outlook and path. I know I’ve got more work to do, and I’ll admit that I am still learning. But when it comes to my pain relationship and my marriage to my spouse, both are worth the effort.

Mara Baer is a writer and health policy consultant offering services through her women-owned small business, AgoHealth. Mara is a member of the Science and Policy Advisory Council for the National Pain Advocacy Center and recently launched a chronic pain newsletter called Chronic Pain Chats.

Why the Ruan Case Won’t Protect Doctors From Prosecution

By Dr. Joseph Parker

Doctors trying to save lives and help pain patients are regularly being sent to prison for prescribing opioids. And despite last year’s Supreme Court ruling in the Ruan case, that’s not changing.  Here’s why. 

First, it’s important to know what you are up against.  When the US federal government goes after a doctor or anyone else, they face a streamlined conviction machine.  Since the time of Ronald Reagan (who I voted for), the rights of an American citizen to challenge the charges against them or try to overturn an unjust conviction have been eroded. 

Then came President Bill Clinton (I voted for him too), who signed into law the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, doing more to ensure that the government can imprison the innocent than any other president since the Civil War.

At the founding of this nation, it was recognized that governments are prone to lock up people they don’t like, finding some legal pretext to justify their actions.  To guard against this, the Constitution and Bill of Rights were adopted to limit the powers of the federal government. 

Originally, there was only one federal crime: an act of treason. This crime was much more limited than the British version had been, when wandering over onto the King’s hunting grounds was considered treason. In the American version, you had to wage war against the United States or give aid and comfort to its enemies during a time of war. 

Then John Adams, the second president of the United States, made sedition a federal crime. Since then, so many federal laws have been added that government itself cannot tell you exactly how many or what they are.

That’s not counting all of the rules and regulations enforced by federal law enforcement, as if they were the law.  Locked up is locked up, after all.  Today the land of the free incarcerates more of its citizens than any other nation.  Not only that, but the sentences have become draconian. 

There is no nation on earth today where the liberty of a citizen has less value than in America.  The US incarcerates an average of 629 people for every 100,000 citizens. The next closest nations are Rwanda, Turkmenistan, El Salvador and Cuba. China and Russia don’t even make the Top 10.

Believe it or not, there are 37 states in the US that beat Cuba’s incarceration rate of 510 prisoners, with Louisiana coming in at a mind numbing 1,341. 

All of those inmates did not end up in prison by accident.  Looking at 2020 numbers, there were about 1,879 criminal cases heard in federal court.  Of those, about 90% of the accused plead guilty without even going to trial. Is that because the US government is absolutely right 90% of the time?  I am cautiously skeptical. Only 0.04% of cases -- 4 out of 1,000 – resulted in acquittal.  Those are not good odds. 

In Ruan v. United States, Dr. Xiulu Ruan appealed his conviction for prescribing opioids in an “unauthorized manner.” In a stunning unanimous verdict, the Supreme Court justices repeated what they said in 1925 in Linder v. United States, and then again in 2006 in Gonzales v. Oregon:  the federal government cannot dictate the practice of medicine and a doctor can only be prosecuted if they knew what they were doing was wrong.

As has happened in the past, US law enforcement doesn’t let something like a Supreme Court ruling slow them down.  They are completely ignoring the Ruan ruling by arguing something called “willful blindness.” What was the doctor willfully blind to?  To whatever opinion the government’s expert witness feels like arguing is the “usual practice of medicine” and “a legitimate medical purpose.”

Even though the Supreme Court made clear that only individual states can regulate the practice of medicine, the government’s hired expert does not have to come from your state or even be familiar with your state’s laws regarding the practice of medicine.

In effect, the DEA argues that there is a national practice of medicine that must be followed.  Where do they draw these medical practice standards when there is no such thing as a federal medical license?  From medical textbooks like the "Principles and Practices of Pain Medicine"?  No.  From the teachings of national medical organizations like the American Academy of Pain Medicine or the American Society of Addiction Medicine?  No again. 

The teachings from those sources are not allowed in court, unless you can get one of the original authors to come testify for you.  And sometimes, not even then.  The chapter on avoiding addiction in pain management from the above textbook was written by Dr. Alan Wartenberg.  Despite his advanced years, Dr. Wartenberg came to my trial to testify for me.  But he was not allowed to be considered as an expert in pain medicine, because he was “only” an addiction specialist. 

This is nothing compared to what happened to Dr. William Bauer of Ohio.  A dozen pharmacists, doctors, and scientists were willing to testify on his behalf, and all of them were disqualified by the court.  But the government’s “experts” in pain medicine can testify about almost anything, including addiction and even chronic cough.

The government does not convict you by proving you are guilty, they convict you by smearing you publicly long before you get to trial, and then making sure that the jury does not have access to the truth, by disqualifying experts, withholding favorable evidence, allowing false testimony, and making false statements to the jury. 

And remember, Dr. Ruan “won” at the Supreme Court. But he’s still in prison. 

Good luck and be prepared.  Ruan will not save you.

Joseph Parker, MD, is Chief Science Officer and Operations Officer at Advanced Research Concepts, a company developing solutions to the challenges of space travel and space-related medical issues.  In clinical practice, Dr. Parker specialized in emergency medicine and served as Director of Emergency Medicine at two hospitals. Prior to that, he had a distinguished career in the U.S. Marines and Air Force. 

In 2022, a federal jury convicted Dr. Parker on two counts of unlawful opioid prescribing. He has filed an appeal as he awaits sentencing.

A Pain Patient's Perspective on Opioid Prescribing

By Barby Ingle, PNN Columnist

It is essential to prescribe pain treatments that are appropriate and effective for each patient. I say that based on my own experiences as a patient, as well as thousands of others I have spoken with over the years as a friend and advocate.

Patients who need opioids, benzodiazepines, antidepressants and other medications should have access to them -- just as a heart patient has access to medication that keeps their heart functioning or a diabetic needs access to insulin.

People living with pain should also be offered individualized treatment. That could be anything from physical therapy and analgesics to surgical procedures and alternative therapies like acupuncture. I have tried over 100 different types of pain treatment; some have worked and others have not. It often made me feel like a guinea pig. Unnecessary surgery hurt me most in the end.

There are many public education campaigns underway to prevent addiction and overdoses by reducing the use of prescription opioids. These campaigns are repeated in the media, but the information does not always include facts or is presented in a misleading way.

For example, there is the DEA’s “One Pill Can Kill” campaign, which is aimed at raising awareness about a surge in counterfeit pills made with illicit fentanyl and other street drugs. Another is the CDC’s “Rx Awareness” campaign, which shares the stories of people whose lives were impacted by prescription opioids. The overall theme is that opioids are “addictive and dangerous.”  

Although well-intentioned, these campaigns have a tendency to demonize FDA-approved medications that have a lot of science and research behind them. Most people are unaware that fentanyl has been used safely and effectively for decades to treat severe pain and as an analgesic in millions of surgeries. Saying “one pill can kill” to a pain patient who has improved their life with a legally prescribed medication is disheartening.

I have seen this misinformation firsthand over the years and how it has put a damper on opioid prescribing. Physicians should prescribe opioids for pain when appropriate, but many are afraid to do so because of potential sanctions and legal threats. As a result, many providers won’t prescribe opioids or will only do so minimally and as a last resort.

Individualized Treatment

I believe each patient is different and should be treated as such. We need providers to operate on the assumption that each individual is unique and requires something different, even when they have the same disease or injury as someone else.

Physicians today can use pharmacogenomics to see if a patient’s DNA can affect how they respond to a treatment or what is chemically right for them. The dosage, brand, procedure and frequency will vary depending on each patient. I often bring my pharmacogenomics information to communicate more effectively with my providers, which benefits us both.

I also know that doing what is least invasive first and then progressing to other options is essential. Sometimes, surgery is the best option. Sometimes, opioids or other pain medications should be used first. Every medical provider should work at finding the treatment that most effectively suits the patient.

It is a considered best practice to prescribe opioids to someone in severe pain from sickle cell disease. Yet, when many sickle cell patients go to the ER or are admitted to a hospital, they are denied opioids because of hospital policy. What is the point of having a trained medical providers on staff if you won’t let them treat a patient the way they should be?

Denying pain relief is not only cruel, it can be the worst practice for everyone involved. For example, a man in severe chronic pain committed suicide after a doctor at a Kentucky pain clinic cut his opioid dose in half. The man’s family filed a lawsuit and won a $7 million judgement against the doctor and clinic.  

Ultimately, it should be the patient's responsibility to weigh the risks and benefits of any treatment, after getting input from their provider and conducting due diligence. Unfortunately, there are many obstacles standing in the way of that. One of the biggest is finding a doctor willing to prescribe pain medication. In addition, there are insurance restrictions, the cost of medication, and other logistical issues such as transportation to appointments.

Here in Arizona, patients must see their provider every month to renew a prescription for a controlled substance. Policies like that were put in place to “protect” pain patients, but only added extra costs, burdens and stigmas to them.

Patient-Physician Communication

How can we change the narrative about opioid prescribing? We can start by emphasizing the importance of effective communication between physicians and patients, even those as young as elementary school. Early education on how to talk to medical professionals and advocate for yourself is vital. I see this as one of the most critical things for patients to do.

Communication and trust are essential. Patients need to know when to take medication, how much to take, and what the potential side effects are. They also need to be able to express how the medication is working and what their symptoms are. Patients should feel comfortable asking questions and discussing their pain management plan. Physicians need to listen, provide feedback and give advice when needed.

Individualized treatment plans should be tailored to the patient’s age, gender, medical history, lifestyle and other factors.  That will help ensure that the treatment is effective and also reduce the risk of adverse reactions and potential complications. Collaborative decision-making makes patients feel more comfortable, confident in their treatment plan, and more likely to follow it.

Barby Ingle is a reality TV personality living with multiple rare and chronic diseases. She is a chronic pain educator, patient advocate, motivational speaker, and the founder and former President of the International Pain Foundation. You can follow Barby at www.barbyingle.com. 

Let’s End the Silence About Endometriosis

By Dr. Kristina Brown, Adler University

Endometriosis causes physical, sexual and emotional pain. About 190 million people around the globe have endometriosis, including one in 10 American women, but there has historically been a deafening silence about the disease and the pervasive impact it can have on a person’s life.

While endometriosis is a chronic gynecological illness that can affect anyone with a uterus – women, transgender men and nonbinary individuals – it often goes undiagnosed because its symptoms can be attributed to other physical or psychological concerns. Patients presenting with this pain are often told it is “all in your head.”

However, endometriosis is becoming a more visible illness, thanks in part to celebrities such as Lena Dunham, Chrissy Teigen, Amy Schumer, Whoopi Goldberg and others who have begun sharing their stories publicly.

After going undiagnosed for 23 years, Padma Lakshmi, a popular cookbook author, actress and host of the TV show “Top Chef,” founded EndoFund, previously Endometriosis Foundation of America, in 2009 so that others do not have to go through what she did.

I am a couple and family therapy professor, clinician and researcher. My own endometriosis diagnosis at the age of 19 has inspired my work exploring how this illness affects others beyond the physical symptoms.

To better understand the impact of endometriosis on relationships, I interviewed 10 couples about their experiences of diagnosis, treatment and living with this disease. Through their stories of how endometriosis-related pain can affect every aspect of daily life, including their intimate relationships, I provide some specific recommendations. The quotes I have included in this article are from my doctoral dissertation research.

Basics of Endometriosis

When a person has endometriosis, the endometrial cells that line their uterus “implant” in places outside the uterus, such as the ovaries, fallopian tubes and the lining of the abdomen — called the peritoneum. At the end of each menstrual cycle, the uterus sheds its lining, which exits the body via the cervix and vagina. The “misplanted” endometrial cells also shed, but they have no place to go – resulting in internal bleeding, inflammation and pain.

An endometriosis diagnosis is described in stages related to the visual presence of the disease, from minimal, or Stage 1, to severe, or Stage 4. However, there is no connection between the stage and the experience of pain.

One symptom of endometriosis is intense pain during the menstrual cycle. Another is pain with sex. Because pain with menses or sex can be attributed to “normal” pain, a history of sexual abuse or psychiatric reasons such as a dislike of sex, some people with endometriosis wait an average of seven years for diagnosis, which can be visually confirmed only through a procedure called laparoscopy.

In addition to these and other types of severe pain, endometriosis can also cause infertility, and patients who want to have children must often undergo medical or surgical interventions to conceive.

Impact on School, Work and Sex

Physical pain from endometriosis can be debilitating. Adolescents with endometriosis may struggle to keep up with their classes, friends, homework or extracurricular activities when the pain becomes too severe. They may shift to home-schooling or virtual learning to complete their studies.

The pain can also deeply affect a career trajectory. “I almost lost my job because of time off,” one interviewee told me. “In fact, when I had to get my hysterectomy, I walked in to tell my manager and he goes, ‘Well, I hope you’re not going to tell me that you have to have a hysterectomy and have to be out for six weeks!’ And I just broke down in tears.”

All of my participants shared experiences where doctors dismissed complaints of sexual pain – called dyspareunia – from endometriosis. This can delay diagnosis and treatment.

Sex and intimacy often become nonexistent, while some couples shared that they have come to accept that pain is part of sex. One woman shared with me: “I don’t want to be touched or have my naked body seen because I feel bloated and ugly and I’m in horrible pain!”

Partners can also be affected emotionally. “I just feel horrible,” one told me. “There are times when we are having sex that I actually feel guilty that I know that I am hurting her and I know she is going to be in pain and it makes me unhappy.”

These experiences of pain, of not being believed by doctors and professionals, of negative effects on education and career and of intimacy destroyed create a heavy emotional burden on individuals and relationships.

Breaking the Silence

When I was diagnosed with endometriosis, it changed the course of my life. My partner and I learned to expand our definition of intimacy and to redistribute household responsibilities when I was incapacitated. As the risk of infertility only increases without intervention, we started conversations about having children earlier than anticipated. My diagnosis also led me to focus my professional identity as a medical family therapist to help others deal with endometriosis and chronic illnesses.

Based on this experience, here are some ways to break this silence:

• Learn about endometriosis. It directly helps when one’s support systems are educated.

• Separate the person from the disease. When the pain you are experiencing from endometriosis is debilitating, help those around you who are also affected to understand that it is because of your endometriosis and it is not personal.

• Speak from your own experience, saying, “I …” rather than “You …” When we do this, it decreases the other person’s defenses and opens up the communication, making space for connection.

My research participants shared their own recommendations with me, especially the importance of believing that their pain is real; accept that what they are sharing is their very real experience, and let them know that they are believed.

Bestselling author and social work researcher Brené Brown has said, “Empathy fuels connection, sympathy drives disconnection.” Approaching someone with endometriosis from a position of empathy sends a message that you want to work with them collaboratively.

By practicing these important relationship skills, we can break the silence around endometriosis.

Kristina S. Brown, PhD, is a Marriage and Family Therapist, and Professor and Chair of Couple and Family Therapy at Adler University in Chicago. Dr. Brown is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Feminist Family Therapy and also serves as the Director of Mental Health for Floating Doctors.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation and is republished with permission.

Is Your Doctor a Good Listener?

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

Many of us have had doctors that we loved. They not only listened, but actually heard us. They gave us their time, attention, and cared -- not only about us, but doing the best they could for us.

They truly follow the intent of the Hippocratic Oath: primum non nocere, or “first, do no harm.”

Then there are the doctors who don't care, and don't even seem to care that we know they don't care. They are quick with us. They don't listen or hear. They have their theories. The facts that we give them about how the pain feels, where it is, etc. make no difference.

I went to a new neurologist. She was very nice, but ignored my pain from trigeminal neuralgia and my long history of surgeries and medications. She decided my issue was “anxiety,” which I never said I had.

She repeatedly asked, “Is your problem anxiety?” I shook my head “no” to answer the question and to show my frustration with her for asking it.

Nevertheless, at the end of the appointment, she asked, “Do you want me to prescribe something for your anxiety?”

Primum non nocere? No. She didn't do harm, but she sure as heck didn't help.

Dr. Norton, my neuro-ophthalmologist, didn't seem to care either, at first. He gave me short shrift by rudely saying, “Stop being so schizophrenic in how you're telling me about your pain.”

Because I was so afraid and worried, I gave him the details in scattershot form, instead of chronological and neatly. After two appointments, he finally understood my pain was real. Suddenly, he cared! The change in him was almost palpable. His words were supportive. He worked to give me hope.

When I first went to the hospital for a pain flare, I was overwhelmed by it. It was spontaneous and constant.  My only hope was that Dr. Norton could stop it.

“Is this ever going to go away?” I asked, my voice tremulous with pain and worry.

“Let me worry about that,” he said. “That's my job.”

His words were a verbal hug. Primum non nocere. He cared about me and would make sure I suffered no further harm. I felt like I was being helped.

Dr. Norton was the face of the caring doctor, the one who follows the oath, who puts his patient first. And that makes all the difference.

As for the doctor who wanted me to say I had anxiety, I canceled my next appointment with her. She was the second neurologist I had seen.  The first was also entrenched in his theories and didn't care about me or the facts.

I was concerned about consulting with a third doctor, fearful I would be accused of "doctor shopping.” I asked my nurse practitioner, “Do you think seeing another neurologist will be an issue?" She shook her head no.

"You have valid reasons for not wanting to stay with them. You need to find someone who will listen to you and deal with the pain," she told me.

And she was right.  I needed another doctor, a doctor like Dr. Norton, (who moved out of state). I need a doctor who works with me, not against me.  Who truly practices primum non nocere.

And that should be the goal for all of us.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here. 

Why Living for Others Keeps Me Going

By Mia Maysack, PNN Columnist

While I am “the strong one” that so many look up to and confide in about their hardships and struggles, there aren't many people that I can reach out to in hopes of receiving the same sort of consideration, counsel or support.

I once expressed to a certified professional that one of the main reasons I'm still in existence is for the sake of other people. They looked at me – perplexed -- and proceeded to explain how that was an “unhealthy” approach to life. My reaction was to smirk, because there was obviously no way in hell this individual could begin relating to, let alone understand, what I was saying.

The vast majority of my experiences with therapy have been that the provider and I may as well have been speaking different languages.

Repeatedly, I'm confronted by individuals who say things such as:

“It's my kids who keep me going!”

“I do it all for them! They are my reason for living! I didn't know love or the point of life until I had children!”

I honor all of that to the best of my ability, but also wonder. What’s the difference between that mindset and the point that I made with the therapist?  There isn't one -- other than the fact my motivation doesn't come from having children, but rather from the brokenness of our world as a whole.

What do I mean when I say I live for the sake of others?  It's that I'm equipped with such a deep sense of compassionate empathy that I am able to hold the edges for people who ordinarily do not feel heard or seen. This somehow cultivates the illusion that I'm superhuman, and don’t need to be seen or heard myself.

Just because some of us don't outwardly complain or vent doesn't mean we have it all together, that everything is easy, or that we ourselves aren't drowning in a sea of despair.

Most people wouldn't know how to handle it, if I shared with them the reality of what my life is truly like. They wouldn't know how to respond if I told them that just getting out of bed for me is like running a marathon. Or if I described the pain and torment in my physical body, which keeps me away from things that I want to do and bring me a sense of meaning, joy and purpose.

They certainly don't know how to handle it when the person they depend on reveals that they're beginning to crumble under the weight life has forced them to carry. Anytime that I've attempted to confide in someone, there are three things that occur:

1. They aren't listening to actually hear you, but are simply awaiting their turn to speak -- which usually involves some sort of comparison between your situations, with a hinted suggestion that their situation is far worse than yours.

2. You make them uncomfortable by expressing yourself authentically. They don't know what to do or say, which often translates into doing or saying not much of anything.

3. It causes them major concern and worry, to the point that I then have to reassure the people I sought comfort from that I’m okay.

It has become easier to remain silent. That is why we suffer. That is what’s killing us.

I have zero questions in my mind as to why someone makes the decision to die. That doesn’t mean condoning or promoting it. I simply comprehend the endless reasons why life can be so tiring and how a lifetime of exhaustion can get old -- to the point where someone no longer wishes to go onward.

I believe in everyone's ability to choose and proceed with what's best or right for them, whether I agree or understand it. I've lost countless loved ones and that has been sufficient reason for me not to check out. I can't do it because so-and-so did. I want to carry on so they continue to live through me.

Although I still feel that way most of the time, it needs to be understood how draining it is. Those of us who've managed to cling to an optimistic viewpoint aren't free from our own demons. We slay them daily for the sake of showing up for you and yours.

Mia Maysack lives with chronic migraine, cluster headache and fibromyalgia. She is the founder of Keepin’ Our Heads Up, a Facebook advocacy and support group, and Peace & Love, a wellness and life coaching practice for the chronically ill. 

Woman Files Civil Rights Lawsuit Over Denial of Pain Treatment

By Madora Pennington, PNN Columnist

In September of 2022, millions watched Tara Rule’s emotional video on TikTok, about a doctor who refused to give her a non-narcotic pain medication because it might cause birth defects. The doctor would not even name the drug, even though Rule told him she has no intention of having children because she has Ehler's Danlos syndrome (EDS), a genetic disorder that causes severe health issues.

The 32-year old Rule recently filed a civil rights lawsuit to better establish the illegality of refusing medical treatment to women simply because they are of childbearing age.

Rule’s fight began when neurologist Jonathan Braiman, MD, steered her away from an effective treatment for her agonizing cluster migraines, a common symptom of EDS. According to Yale Medical School, cluster headaches can hurt more than childbirth.

When Rule realized she was being discriminated against by her doctor, she surreptitiously switched on her cell phone to record their discussion, which is legal in New York state. 

Brainman can be heard in the recording asking Rule intrusive questions about her sex life, while ignoring her answers. Rule explained that she was already on a medication that can cause birth defects -- known as teratogenic drug -- and wasn't well enough to have children anyway.

Brainman patronizingly told her she might change her mind if she were to become pregnant. He recommended that she bring in her boyfriend to consent to any treatment that might cause birth defects. Rule left without getting the pain relief she needed for her migraines.

In the parking lot of Albany Medical Center, where the appointment took place, a distraught and tearful Rule made the video and posted it online. Her raw emotion and disturbing story quickly went viral, not only on social media, but in news stories.

In her lawsuit against Braiman and Albany Medical, Rule alleges she was retaliated against by the hospital system. Rule says she was ejected from an unaffiliated urgent care center because Albany Medical had told other hospitals not to treat her. She believes this was a violation of her medical privacy.  

Rule suspects she was blacklisted by other providers in her area. She tried to make an appointment with another neurologist, but was told she was “not an appropriate patient.” Her primary care provider sent a back-dated letter to Rule and her mother saying he was dismissing them as patients. That doctor gave no valid reason for the patient abandonment.

TARA RULE (TIKTOK)

Rule is on disability and lives on less than $1,000 per month. Being banned as a patient is a real hardship.

“Now I have to go to Connecticut to see physicians in a different hospital system. Or travel three and a half hours to New York City. With hotels and gas, it’s very hard. Some of these specialists outside the state are not fully covered by my insurance,” Rule said.

Traveling is made more complicated because Rule can’t stay just anywhere — she needs accessible hotel rooms. And she is accumulating thousands of dollars in debt.

After posting her video, Rule heard from many other patients who have also been discriminated against by their doctors. She felt motivated to find out what legal remedies existed.

With legal guidance, Rule wrote the civil rights complaint herself in what is known as a “federal question” lawsuit, an action that seeks to clarify a constitutional issue in US federal court. Rule has been advised that the medical care she sought does not fall under “conscience protections,” which allow doctors to refuse treatment on religious or moral grounds.  

In preparation for her lawsuit, Rule obtained her medical and insurance records, to help prove that privacy violations occurred. She discovered she had been billed for services not received, and believes her medical records were forged.

Albany Medical did not respond to a request for comment.

Rule’s lawsuit is potentially precedent-setting. It marks the first federal question case against a medical provider for refusing to provide teratogenic drugs because a woman is of “childbearing age.” Refusing to give routine medical care because a patient might get pregnant is discrimination. Patients cannot be forced into unnecessary restraints on their care.

"I am prepared for whatever happens,” says Rule, who is hopeful her lawsuit will help prevent other patients from being discriminated against by their doctors. 

Madora Pennington is the author of the blog LessFlexible.com about her life with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. She graduated from UC Berkeley with minors in Journalism and Disability Studies. 

How to Advocate With the News Media

By Barby Ingle, PNN Columnist 

So many in the chronic pain community wonder how to share their stories with the news media and connect with reporters. I have been doing that for years as a patient advocate, creating newsworthy content that helps educate the public about the issues we face.

The media are a powerful tool for advocacy because they can help you reach a larger audience and get your message out there. Networking with different media outlets has allowed me to spread my advocacy message further and make a real impact. I have built relationships with the media and gained access to publications I never had before. 

For example, I researched all of the major news outlets in Arizona, where I live, and learned who the producers, publishers and health writers are. I then connected and introduced myself to each of them.

Whenever I have a significant news item in the chronic pain or rare disease community that affects Arizonans, I reach out. Even when I do not have a specific story to pitch, I stay in touch. That helps to keep me in their minds. When they have a new story or need to verify something, they contact me for comment and to confirm the information. 

Media outlets can help you reach your target audience and spread the word about patient issues, products, services and disease-specific information. The more information we share effectively, the better access we’ll have to treatment. Media can be a friend or foe. We must learn to use them to get others involved.

We must also be mindful of our message and portrayal in the media, ensuring the information we provide is accurate and that the story is told to benefit our cause. We should also be prepared for any potential negative backlash from media campaigns. Choosing bipartisan, non-political topics, such as promoting individualized care and understanding how our medical system works can avoid this. 

We must also remain vigilant and aware of misinformation and bias in the media. It is essential to consider the impact of our message and how different communities may perceive it. 

Sharing Your Message

How can you share your message through the media to make a difference? Focus on issues that resonate with their audience and yours. Be bold in your advocacy approach. Feel free to challenge the status quo and use the media to highlight critical issues.

You can use a variety of mediums to reach your target audience. Be open to sharing on television, radio, newspapers, magazines, online, and in support groups. 

Communicate your message creatively to build interest in topics. You will need to offer something “new” to the media and be prepared to discuss your subject from multiple points of view, so that it connects with more people. Monitor the response to your message and adjust accordingly. Follow up and ensure the right message is heard.

Different people have different interests and perspectives. It's essential to tailor your message to specific groups of people so that they can understand and appreciate what you have to say. 

A 60-second message I could leave for a local news reporter might go something like this:

“Hello. I am Barby Ingle, a health advocate and chronic disease patient with multiple rare diseases. I live in Gold Canyon, AZ, and am excited to be working with my state senator on health bill SB1234.

I live with a rare pain condition called Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. It has affected every aspect of my life: financial, social, family and access to care. 2.9 million Arizonans live with a condition that involves pain; here in our district, approximately 150,000 are affected.

SB1234 is designed to help patients like me get better access to proper and timely care. I would love to set up a time to speak with you in detail or I can come in for an interview or live segment. I will email you a copy of the bill and supporting details. Please be on the watch for it in the next few minutes.

Feel free to call me back or email me to schedule a meeting. I look forward to hearing from you or one of your staff members soon. Thanks!” 

You should know the audience or readership of the media outlet you work with. That will help you understand what approach to take with your messaging and takeaways for that audience. It will make your pitch stronger, and give readers and viewers an opportunity to act on it. Be creative in your approach and use various media platforms. 

Additionally, by monitoring the response, you can identify which messages are resonating and which may need further adjustments. Following up with your audience shows that you care and are invested in the conversation.

Making or sharing a video, podcast or online post to explain your topic further is also possible. Don't just do the media as a one-and-done -- share it on social media to reach a wider audience.

To conclude, we must be willing to engage with the news media and the public to ensure our message is heard. The media can give the pain community the attention needed to spread a message of need.

Be it a lack of individualized care, a decision that negatively affects the pain community, or a desire for an amended state/federal law, our voices can be used to make change and make a difference in the lives of the patients. Ultimately, we are responsible for accurately communicating our message to the press and the public. 

Barby Ingle is a reality TV personality living with multiple rare and chronic diseases. She is a chronic pain educator, patient advocate, motivational speaker, and best-selling author on pain topics. You can follow Barby at www.barbyingle.com. 

There Is Help Out There, But You Have Look For It

By Ann Marie Gaudon, PNN Columnist

As a patient, you strive to be heard. Nowhere is this truer than when your medical issues are chronic and complex. However, when your physicians dismiss, minimize, invalidate, and/or ignore what you say, this can lead to a misdiagnosis or lack of diagnosis – which can lead to your condition getting worse.

Physicians rely on test results, but what if the test is an epic failure? What if there is no test at all to diagnose you?

Medical providers can erroneously blame your suffering on your age, race, sexuality, gender, weight or other factors that have nothing to do with your complaint. It’s also not uncommon for a physician to tell a patient that there is nothing at all wrong with them and that it’s essentially “all in their head.”

Even if your symptoms do not resolve, further testing may not be offered. You may not be listened to or you may have your symptoms downplayed.

I learned that the hard way after experiencing a significant back injury in 2017. I thought I was going to be disabled forever. My own medical system could not help me. I was told I had to wait six weeks for an appointment and if I was still in pain then, an MRI would be ordered.

The MRI was ordered and the imaging showed a significant injury. But my general practitioner could offer no help aside from a mild muscle relaxant. I was referred to an orthopedic surgeon who could also offer no help. I never considered surgery – truth be told it terrified me – but I was looking for any treatment to help myself heal.

Fate brought me to a CBC radio interview with Stuart McGill, PhD, Professor Emeritus at the University of Waterloo. I immediately bought McGill’s book “Back Mechanic” and started my healing journey with one of his master clinicians.

I learned the medical system knows virtually nothing about the injury I had and had no way to help me heal from it.

Fast forward six years. Here I am “back” to back pain; limping and having significant pain in my upper right leg. I found out that I had been engaging in activity that I should not have been (weight lifting) and not doing enough to strengthen my core.

Now a loss of height and stiffness in my spinal joints are giving me much grief. My L4 and L5 have lost their strength due to injury, and the lower joint L3 is feeling the lack of support.

The entire point of this column is to show you the difference between seeing a physician who has no knowledge and relies on unreliable tests, and finding and seeing someone who has the essential knowledge to help you heal.

Take a look for yourself. Remember, my symptoms were lower back pain, upper right leg pain and a limp. Here is a copy of my recent MRI report, which is the only test my GP has ordered. Also, here is a copy of my personalized treatment recommendations from Professor McGill, which I use along with his book. Notice anything different between these two assessments?

This difference means everything! Why? Because one is antiseptic, hopeless and sounds like my pain was of my own doing. The other offers the reason for the pain, plus exercise and treatment options I can do to make it better.

My lapse in keeping up with the exercises necessary to protect my spine was slow and happened over time. I’m not sure that I even noticed. By the time I did, I had already irritated my compromised spine.

If I want to be free of back pain, I will always have to do protective exercises. I will always have to take care. This is of little consequence, considering that pain and disability are the alternative.

Thank you, Professor McGill for being the compassionate and skilled researcher that you are. There are so many of us in need of real help with our back injuries. I am so grateful for you and your life’s work.

Here is what I have learned. Often there is a practitioner who is knowledgeable and skilled in helping you with a complex and chronic condition. But the only way I have found these people is by accident or by word of mouth. I don’t see this changing anytime soon.

Don’t give up hope and be prepared to investigate your options!

Ann Marie Gaudon is a registered social worker and psychotherapist in the Waterloo region of Ontario, Canada with a specialty in chronic pain management.  She has been a chronic pain patient for over 30 years and works part-time as her health allows. For more information about Ann Marie's counseling services, visit her website. 

Is Your Doctor a Master or Servant?

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

Recently, I heard a doctor on TV say something that seems to be common sense: a doctor must be the servant of his patient and not the master. The Hippocratic Oath says as much, that a doctor should be “a servant of people.”

Though the wording is old-fashioned, the point is well taken. I have experienced doctors trying to act as masters, not servants.

I’ll tell a doctor all of my symptoms, only to have her concentrate on one or two. Then she makes her pronouncement: “This is my diagnosis. This is the treatment I am prescribing.”

If I ask, “What about my other symptoms?” I’ll be dismissed.

“Try the treatment and if it’s not better, come back in six weeks.”

There’s no room for discussion. That’s the way a master would talk to a servant.

Some patients think they are the masters. They’ll say, “No you're wrong. I need and will only accept this medication or treatment.”

It seems many chronic pain patients, more so than others, are of two beliefs: we want the doctor to help us, to diagnose our condition and to end our pain to the best of their ability. That makes them somewhat our master.

But many of us also think we should be the master of the doctor when it comes to what he will give us to end our pain: “I want this drug, this dosage, and this number of pills.”'

I almost never hear someone say, “The doctor refuses to give me the test I want” or “She won't refer me to the specialist I want to see.” Pain patients tend to want those decisions left to the doctor.

In recent years, a major loss for doctors is their ability to be their own masters when it comes to prescribing pain medication, specifically opioids.

The best example I have of this is my own experience from decades ago. My ophthalmologist understood that my trigeminal neuralgia pain was unmanageable. He had nothing to offer that would completely eliminate my facial pain, but he wanted to at least mitigate it. He gave me with a prescription for an 8-ounce bottle of Tincture of Opium.

The first pharmacy I went to couldn't fill it because they didn't carry opium. But the pharmacist didn't look askance at me or the prescription. The second pharmacist I saw also gave me no debate, no questions, and no dirty or suspicious looks. Within 10 minutes, I left the pharmacy with a bottle of opium in my purse.

Of course, we all know that could never happen now.  I don't even know if a doctor can write a prescription for opium anymore. It is hard to be a master of the patient when your hands are tied, and you fear losing your livelihood, freedom or both.

When it comes to opioids, we cannot be masters of our doctor, no matter how much we may want to be. We can't insist that we need an opioid, when by law or fear, a doctor won’t comply.

What we need to accept is that neither doctor or patient should be master or servant of the other. Some doctors may not accept this and some patients may not want it, but the best relationship we can have with our medical providers is a partnership.

Doctors need to do a better job explaining why they prescribe something. And, if it is an opioid, why the amount and dosage is less than what we may want.  And we, as patients, need to understand that we can’t insist on what a doctor is unwilling to provide.

For partnerships to work, both sides need to come to a mutual understanding of what can and can't be done. Sometimes that means being disappointed. But disappointment that is based on mutual acceptance and respect can help mitigate the negative, allowing for a much better relationship.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

Lyme Disease: How a Bacteria Plays Havoc with Immune Systems

By Dr. Jenny Wachter, University of Saskatchewan

Lyme disease is the leading vector-borne disease — meaning diseases that are transmitted to humans from another organism like a tick or mosquito — in North America and Europe.

New human cases are estimated at over 400,000 in the United States each year. Canada has experienced a drastic increase in human cases, from 266 cases in 2011 to 3,147 in 2021, as the habitat of its vector, a tick, expands north.

The initial symptoms of human Lyme disease can be vague, such as fever, headache, fatigue and often rash. It is a potentially serious condition that can affect multiple systems in the body — including the heart, nervous system and joints — and can become a chronic illness.

Lyme disease is caused by a unique, spiral-shaped (spirochete) bacterium called Borrelia burgdorferi. B. burgdorferi cannot survive in the environment on its own. For survival and transmission, it requires susceptible hosts (usually small mammals or birds) and a specific vector: the black-legged tick, also called the deer tick.

Evading the Immune System

B. burgdorferi must survive extremely diverse conditions over the course of its transmission and infection cycle: from host to tick vector, and then into new hosts.

This bacterium senses and responds to its surroundings, most notably by modifying its appearance by changing the proteins on its outer surface to help it survive in either the tick or the host.

When a tick infected by B. burgdorferi bites and feeds on a vertebrate host, it provides a signal for the bacteria to switch its proteins to those required to infect the host, and to begin migrating through the tick and into the bite site. This process takes between 36 and 72 hours.

However, many of these proteins are recognized by the host as foreign, and the host’s immune system works to try to clear the infection. This includes a strong, antibody response targeted against B. burgdorferi.

Despite these immune responses, B. burgdorferi is able to cause long-term infections. In natural host reservoirs — the animals that the bacterium usually finds itself in via tick bites, such as small rodents — these infections do not cause diseases like those seen in humans and other non-natural reservoirs.

In fact, the bacteria itself does not produce any products that would be toxic to its hosts, either natural or non-natural. Yet chronic infection in humans can lead to Lyme neuroborreliosis, carditis and Lyme arthritis.

How then, are these bacteria able to cause such a devastating disease in humans and other animals, but not in their natural host reservoirs?

While there is still much to learn about B. burgdorferi, we know of several factors that play a role in the range of disease it causes. These include:

• its genetic make-up,

• its ability to access various tissues (such as the joints, heart and nervous system) due to its ability to move around (motility), and

• the immune response of the host.

Apart from motility, B. burgdorferi also protects itself from the strong B. burgdorferi-specific targeted antibody response of its host’s immune system by changing the appearance of the main outer surface protein expressed during persistent infection in a process called antigenic variation.

In addition to antigenic variation, B. burgdorferi bacteria can also change their DNA by exchanging genetic information, a process also known as gene transfer. This process allows these bacteria to further alter their appearance during infection to avoid the host immune system.

This process works so well that these B. burgdorferi bacteria appear different enough to allow re-infection or even co-infection (where multiple strains of B. burgdorferi infect a single host at the same time) of a vertebrate host, like a mouse or a human, despite the presence of specific antibodies to fight the bacterium.

In fact, in nature, the majority of host reservoirs and the ticks that carry the bacterium are infected with multiple strains of B. burgdorferi. The ability of B. burgdorferi to reinfect and co-infect both ticks and hosts increases the spread of the bacteria in the environment as well as the chances that humans will encounter Lyme disease.

Human Cases of Lyme Disease Are Increasing

As a vector-borne pathogen, B. burgdorferi only infects individuals that are bitten by an infected tick. It is not transmitted from person to person.

Environments that support black-legged/deer ticks are at risk of harbouring B. burgdorferi. In North America, these species of ticks are widely distributed throughout the eastern and midwestern United States. Recent geographic expansion to the north is increasing the prevalence of Lyme disease in Canada.

The increase of human Lyme disease cases highlights the failure of existing preventive strategies — such as minimizing exposure to tick habitats, performing diligent tick checks, and wearing suitable clothing when performing activities in known tick habitats — and emphasizes the need for an effective human vaccine.

At Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan, we are taking a One Health approach by recognizing that human health is closely related to the health of animals and the shared environment. We are investigating the role of B. burgdorferi, ticks, and susceptible animals on the spread and survival of the Lyme disease bacterium.

It is important to mimic the natural infectious cycle as much as possible when identifying potential vaccine and drug targets. This is because the way host animals are infected (for example, artificial needle infection or natural tick bite) can produce drastic differences in the resulting infection.

Additionally, despite the prevalence of this disease, there are still many aspects of the infectious cycle that remain unknown due to the uniqueness of B. burgdorferi and a lack of knowledge about the tick vector.

For example, we recently learned that a B. burgdorferi protein is responsible for regulating the components necessary for the bacterium to infect vertebrates, including humans. The absence of this protein, among other things, leads to the death of B. burgdorferi in ticks, making it an exciting target for research investigation.

By learning more about the molecular mechanisms that change or reduce the severity of the disease caused by this bacterium, we can identify new targets for the prevention of human Lyme disease. 

Jenny Wachter, PhD, is a research scientist and adjunct professor at University of Saskatchewan.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation and is republished with permission.

Understanding the Difference Between Chronic Pain and Intractable Pain

By Dr. Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist  

The difference between simple chronic pain and intractable pain (IP) is what is known as pathologic sympathetic overdrive. This major medical complication is characterized by excessive electrical activity in the body's sympathetic nervous system. Excess electricity causes hyperarousal and pathologic overactivity of the sympathetic nervous system, which controls the body’s stress response. A comprehensive grasp of this complication is crucial for effective treatment.

Pathologic complication is the root cause of the disability, profound suffering and shortened lifespan often caused by intractable pain. Even though I recognized and published the difference between chronic and intractable pain in the Western Journal of Medicine over 20 years ago, it is still poorly understood in the mainstream medical practices of today. This contributes greatly to the undertreatment and mistreatment of IP patients.

The severe, constant and disabling pain of IP causes anatomical defects in the brain, which leads the cells in the brain to generate excess electricity. This is how pathologic sympathetic overdrive (PSO) starts. The brain must get rid of the excess electricity to prevent damage from the “burning” of brain tissue.

The brain rids itself of excess electricity by sending it into the sympathetic nervous system. This system is comprised of nerves that connect the brain to the heart, blood vessels, skin, lung and gastrointestinal system. The best-known neural connection in the network that connects the brain to bodily organs is the vagus nerve, but there are less known nerve connections in and along the spinal cord.

The “overdrive” of excess electricity produces a typical set of easily recognized symptoms and physical signs. These include an elevated pulse rate (tachycardia), high blood pressure, cold extremities (sometimes exhibiting a bluish hue), goosebumps, dilated pupils, and hyperactive reflexes. Another common symptom is temperature spikes and flushing, often followed by chills.

Amazingly, while the nation persistently clamors about the importance of controlling blood pressure, making Americans very aware that hypertension leads to serious medical conditions and is one of the leading causes of death in the U.S., I cannot identify a single lay magazine or medical journal that even refers to the undeniable correlation between severe, unmanaged pain and high blood pressure.  Strangely, there is also a conspicuous absence of discussions even in medical publications about the necessity of adequate pain management to reduce blood pressure.

Complications Caused by Intractable Pain

PSO interferes with normal respiratory function. The lungs may not expand and bring in the normal level of oxygen, and carbon dioxide may elevate in the blood. Inadequate oxygenation may lead to lethargy, fatigue, poor motivation, muscle weakness and mental impairment.

An IP patient’s ability to sleep, and especially achieving adequate REM sleep, is greatly reduced by PSO.  The hazards of inadequate sleep are well-known: fatigue, depression, amotivation, poor mental activity, and hormone imbalances. A tragic misunderstanding is the belief that somehow a lack of sleep is better than taking a bedtime sedative. This notion lacks any scientific merit.

There are lesser known but other serious and debilitating sequalae of PSO. The gastrointestinal system becomes so impaired by PSO to the point that loss of appetite, malabsorption (nutrients do not assimilate) and malnutrition is present in essentially all IP patients. The disturbed nutritional metabolic deficits can lead to either significant weight gain or loss. Constipation and diarrhea will often alternate, while stomach pain and bloating are routine. Patients are often misdiagnosed as having irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), with treatment that gives no consideration that bowel symptoms will persist without control of the underlying IP.

PSO has a significant impact on the endocrine system, similar to the body's "fight or flight" response during moments of stress. With IP the stress is constant. This physiological response involves an increase in adrenaline and cortisone levels in the bloodstream. Normally, this response to stress is temporary, allowing the adrenal and pituitary glands to recover and remain intact. But with the constant pain and electrical overdrive of IP, the glands hypertrophy (enlarge abnormally) trying to keep up their hormonal output to protect the body.

Unfortunately, the glands will often deplete. IP patients have died due to adrenal failure as the glands could not produce enough cortisone and adrenaline to maintain life. PSO tends to especially cause the pituitary gland to enlarge. Some uninformed surgeons have “removed the pituitary tumor” without understanding the root cause of the enlargement, or the imperative need to manage pain.

If PSO goes on long enough, and the pituitary and adrenal glands exhaust or wear out, testosterone and estradiol will deplete. While most people are aware of the impact of such depletion on libido and menstrual functions, what many medical practitioners miss is the critical role these hormones play in tissue healing, pain reduction, and various mental functions.

Since PSO raises cortisone for as long as one has IP, calcium is extracted from bones and teeth. Osteoporosis may develop and teeth may deteriorate. Sudden loss of a tooth is common in IP as is chronic dental cavities.

PSO in an adult IP patient will often cause some level of adult attention deficit disorder (ADD/ADHD), which is the exact clinical syndrome that occurs in a child with hyperactivity or attention deficit disorder. Furthermore, when the IP patient develops the same “attention deficits,” they will need the same medications that a child does to normalize attention span, carry out the 3R’s (“reading, riting, rithmetic”), and activities of daily living.

The mental aberrations caused by IP, unless treated with today’s hyperactivity medications (Ritalin, Adderall), can be so debilitating that the IP patient can become a lonely, despondent invalid, who becomes expensive to care for and totally dependent on family and society. The medical profession’s rejection or dismissal of ADD/ADHD in IP patients can only be classified as blatant professional oversight.

Diagnosing Intractable Pain

It is essential to point out that a medical practitioner who understands PSO can distinguish an IP patient from a simple chronic pain patient with a 5-to-10-minute physical examination. For starters, the IP patient with PSO will show some abnormality of pulse-rate, blood pressure, temperature or breathing rate. Some reflexes will be hyperactive, and the pupil may be dilated.  Hands and feet will be cold to touch and may show a blue discoloration. Teeth will be missing and/or show a lot of decay. Mental activity and speech may be slow and deliberate. Movement also may be slow.

These physical signs correlated with the history and symptoms provided by the patient and family will easily and quickly nail down the presence of IP and PSO, without the need for blood tests or brain scans.

This essay is a call for all parties concerned to fully understand the difference between chronic pain and intractable pain with PSO. Every IP patient, family and medical practitioner must fully understand that PSO will cause dire complications. IP patients and their families need to recognize them and record their PSO manifestations and present them to their medical practitioners.

Sadly, this author cannot identify a single education effort by a recognized medical publication, organization or academic institution that has or is currently trying to educate on the obvious and blatant clinical manifestations of the sympathetic pathological complications of IP. Like most things in medical science and practice today, the demand and education must “start at the bottom and work up.”

Forest Tennant, MD, DrPH, is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on the treatment of intractable pain. To help patients and clinicians better understand intractable pain, the Tennant Foundation has launched a new website, IntractablePain.Org, where you can learn more about the conditions that cause intractable pain and their many complications.

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.  

How Technology Could Improve Healthcare in Underserved Communities

By Barby Ingle, PNN Columnist 

This year I was fortunate to visit all 15 counties in Arizona, from large cities and rural areas to those considered “frontier” and tribal reservations. I talked to patients, providers and caregivers about the stress points in their access to healthcare. I was in towns with no EMS, no hospital, and no specialists.

Seeing these disparities in healthcare closeup was an eye-opener for me. Imagine being injured or needing surgery, and you must take a helicopter to get immediate care. It’s like living on another planet.  

We can ensure that underserved communities have equal access to healthcare services, regardless of location, by providing remote and rural areas with access to telemedicine. Although the ability to access the internet is still difficult in some areas, services like Elon Musk's Star Link are being utilized to improve healthcare no matter where you live. 

With the recent pandemic, we were able to utilize telemedicine more often and see advancements in digital health solutions. Healthcare professionals can now remotely diagnose, treat and monitor patients from a distance. But will relaxed telehealth rules continue in the same form now that the pandemic has ended? Many of the details are still being worked out.

Mobile applications and wearable devices enable patients to monitor their vital signs and share the data with providers, allowing for remote monitoring and proactive intervention. They can also empower patients to more closely monitor their own health, receive medical advice, and manage chronic conditions from their homes.

With the increased availability of internet connectivity and mobile networks, technology has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery and improve health outcomes in remote and underserved regions. Several steps can be taken to address the digital divide in healthcare between urban and rural areas.

First, it is crucial to educate individuals about the benefits of technology and digital health tools. Technology can reduce transportation barriers, provide on-demand health advice, and minimize the risk of exposure to infectious diseases by enabling patients to stay at home.

Second, partnerships between stakeholders, such as academia, the private sector and government can help narrow the digital divide by leveraging resources to place healthcare technology where it is most needed. By building awareness, partnerships and targeting resources, it will be possible to bridge the digital divide and ensure that all communities have access to healthcare technology.

Here are some specific steps that can be taken:

• Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment in underserved communities to understand their unique healthcare challenges, cultural context and technological requirements. A needs assessment can involve surveys, interviews and focus group discussions with community members, healthcare providers and other stakeholders.

• Engage community members, healthcare professionals, and technology experts in a co-design approach. This means collaborating with the community to design and develop healthcare technology solutions that align with its needs, preferences and capabilities.  

• Adopt a user-centered design approach to make sure healthcare technology is user friendly.  Involve people from underserved communities in testing and interface design to ensure the technology is accessible, culturally appropriate and easy to operate.

• Consider the affordability and sustainability of healthcare technology by addressing cost barriers. ensuring compatibility with low-resource settings, and developing tools that can operate with limited infrastructure or connectivity.

• Provide training and support for people to utilize healthcare technology effectively. The training should include digital literacy programs, capacity-building workshops, and ongoing technical assistance.  

By involving underserved communities in the design process, healthcare technology can be tailored to their specific needs, leading to increased adoption and improved healthcare outcomes. It is crucial to prioritize the needs of these communities to ensure that they are included in the design and development of healthcare technology. By doing so, we can create more effective and sustainable solutions that genuinely address the healthcare challenges faced by underserved communities.

I am grateful for the opportunity to talk to patients, providers and caregivers in Arizona, thanks to a grant from HealtheVoices, Respond & Rescue, KB Companies and the International Pain Foundation. I look forward to continuing to gather feedback from underserved communities nationwide. By listening to patients and understanding their unique healthcare challenges, we can work towards creating meaningful solutions that improve access to care and overall health outcomes. 

Barby Ingle is a reality TV personality living with multiple rare and chronic diseases. She is a chronic pain educator, patient advocate, motivational speaker, and best-selling author on pain topics. You can follow Barby at www.barbyingle.com. 

The National Opioid Settlement Is Causing Drug Shortages

By Pat Irving, Guest Columnist

I am a retired nurse with over 40 years of healthcare experience. The principal focus of my career was on healthcare regulations, risk management and patient safety.  My most recent position was as National Leader for Risk and Patient Safety for Kaiser Permanente. 

As a pain patient myself and the victim of a mandatory opioid taper, I was motivated to understand the reasons behind the many difficulties patients have getting opioids, anti-anxiety medications and other controlled substances. 

The goal of my research over the last several months is to help patients and their families understand the drastic changes in pain management that have occurred in recent years. While much of it is due to the CDC opioid guideline and the law enforcement crackdown on prescribers, the fallout from opioid litigation now plays a major role in our inability to get prescriptions filled.

As early as 2017, acting on the incorrect premise that prescription opioids were the primary cause for the opioid crisis, the National Association of Attorneys General began a legal assault on entities they believed were responsible for the “opioid crisis.”  This included opioid manufacturers, big chain pharmacies, and the three biggest wholesale distributors -- AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, and McKesson.

On July 21, 2021, the Attorneys General announced that they had reached a $26 billion settlement with the three distributors and Johnson & Johnson, who agreed to make major changes in how they do business.  The intent was to improve the safety and oversight of prescription opioids, but the unintended consequences of the settlement have caused incalculable harm to patients with chronic pain and mental health disorders.

In addition to the monetary settlement, the three distributors agreed to substantially increase measures to identity suspicious orders from pharmacies for ten years.  The distributors, collectively known as “Injunctive Relief Distributors,” also established an independent clearinghouse to keep track of every shipment of opioids and other controlled substances to pharmacies.

Red Flags and Suspicious Orders

For reference, the 571-page settlement can be found at this link.  The most important section (Exhibit “P”) begins on page 478.  Among other things, it requires the distributors to collect from each pharmacy a list of their top prescribers for opioids and other “Highly Diverted Controlled Substances,” the number of prescriptions and doses they wrote, their DEA registration number, address and medical specialty.

You may notice several other things.  Many of the restrictions came directly out of DEA regulations.  For example, there is language about “Red Flags” and “Suspicious Orders,” the latter being “orders of unusual size, orders deviating substantially from a normal pattern, and orders of unusual frequency.”

Other potential red flags include patients paying for a prescription in cash and “out-of-area” patients with prescribing doctors from a zip code that’s 50 miles or more from the pharmacy. 

If a pharmacy customer has an excessive number of suspicious orders or “unresolved Red Flag activity,” it risks being “terminated” from receiving further controlled substances – which would effectively put the pharmacy out of business: 

“In the event that an Injunctive Relief Distributor identifies one or more unresolved Red Flags or other information indicative of potential diversion of Controlled Substances through the onboarding process or otherwise, the Injunctive Relief Distributor shall refrain from selling Controlled Substances to the potential Customer pending additional due diligence.”

It is easy to see why the settlement has made pharmacists more hesitant, even fearful, about filling orders that might be suspicious. 

Under federal law, pharmacists already had a “corresponding authority” to decide whether a prescription is suspicious and if it should be filled. Whereas before a pharmacist might call a prescriber to double check on a prescription and the reasons for it, under the settlement a pharmacist may err on the side of caution and not fill the prescription at all.

To make the situation worse, the definitions of “suspicious orders” are purposely vague, and may be interpreted in the strictest way possible.  For example, since the CDC guideline recommends that physicians “should carefully evaluate” increasing doses above 50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), the distributor or pharmacy may see that as hard limit, not a suggestion.  

And because the CDC guideline urges caution when prescribing opioids and benzodiazepines together, that may be another hard stop on a prescription, regardless of how long or how safely a patient was managed on these medications. There may be serious consequences for the prescribing physician as well, who could be reported to state authorities and the DEA if they have too many suspicious prescriptions.

Medication Thresholds 

The injunction also brought with it medication “thresholds.”  Unlike the annual DEA production quotas which are imposed on drug makers nationwide, the settlement thresholds are very specific to each pharmacy or pharmacy chain. It limits the total volume of a controlled substance that a pharmacy may receive in any given month, quarter and year.  These threshold limits, are developed by the distributor using a statistical algorithm of their own design. 

Once a pharmacy has exceeded its particular threshold, it is unable to obtain additional medication in that drug category. Physicians and patients have no way of knowing if they are the unlucky ones to have exceeded a pharmacy’s threshold.  For many patients, this means being cutoff cold turkey, waiting another month, or having a prescription only partially filled – essentially a forced taper.

Many health plans talk about their concern for patient safety, but there is often a lack of information given to patients about the known risks of tapering, especially for “legacy” patients who have been on prescribed opioids for an extended period, and who were stable and doing well. There is often no discussion with the tapered patient on the possibility of withdrawal, suicidal thoughts, anxiety, depression, and unmanaged pain. 

The patient population most affected by the distributors’ settlement are either disabled, seniors or both.  This is the very population that has difficulty accessing alternative pain therapies such as acupuncture or injections, and in many cases are alone and homebound. It has been almost impossible to get attention for this segment of the population that needs the most support. 

There has been no strong response to the settlement and resulting drug shortages from the Health and Human Services Administration, DEA, CDC, or FDA.  There has also been a lack of a coordinated response from Medicare/CMS to patients being forcibly tapered. 

It is likewise unclear what position state medical and pharmacy boards are taking on the ruptured drug supply chain. Many patients with legitimate prescriptions now have to wait weeks for their medications to become available or are forced to travel to other pharmacies to get their prescriptions filled. Worst of all, the suffering imposed on these patients has done nothing to reduce the number of drug overdose deaths.

Our government must wake up to the fact that the injunction portion of the settlement must be modified.  There are sections of the settlement that allow for “potential adjustments” and “modifications” in the event of a national or state emergency “to meet the critical needs of the supply chain.” Such an emergency now exists.

Future efforts by stakeholders must focus attention on these sections and the need for changes. It is possible to have a safe and well monitored drug supply chain that also allows legitimate patients to have the medical treatment they deserve. As it stands now, patients are needlessly suffering due to the unreasonable restrictions imposed by the national opioid settlement.

Pat Irving, RN, lives with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (now in remission) and piriformis syndrome, a type of sciatica. Pat wishes to thank Monty Goddard, a patient advocate, for his contributions to her research.