Woman Files Civil Rights Lawsuit Over Denial of Pain Treatment
/By Madora Pennington, PNN Columnist
In September of 2022, millions watched Tara Rule’s emotional video on TikTok, about a doctor who refused to give her a non-narcotic pain medication because it might cause birth defects. The doctor would not even name the drug, even though Rule told him she has no intention of having children because she has Ehler's Danlos syndrome (EDS), a genetic disorder that causes severe health issues.
The 32-year old Rule recently filed a civil rights lawsuit to better establish the illegality of refusing medical treatment to women simply because they are of childbearing age.
Rule’s fight began when neurologist Jonathan Braiman, MD, steered her away from an effective treatment for her agonizing cluster migraines, a common symptom of EDS. According to Yale Medical School, cluster headaches can hurt more than childbirth.
When Rule realized she was being discriminated against by her doctor, she surreptitiously switched on her cell phone to record their discussion, which is legal in New York state.
Brainman can be heard in the recording asking Rule intrusive questions about her sex life, while ignoring her answers. Rule explained that she was already on a medication that can cause birth defects -- known as teratogenic drug -- and wasn't well enough to have children anyway.
Brainman patronizingly told her she might change her mind if she were to become pregnant. He recommended that she bring in her boyfriend to consent to any treatment that might cause birth defects. Rule left without getting the pain relief she needed for her migraines.
In the parking lot of Albany Medical Center, where the appointment took place, a distraught and tearful Rule made the video and posted it online. Her raw emotion and disturbing story quickly went viral, not only on social media, but in news stories.
In her lawsuit against Braiman and Albany Medical, Rule alleges she was retaliated against by the hospital system. Rule says she was ejected from an unaffiliated urgent care center because Albany Medical had told other hospitals not to treat her. She believes this was a violation of her medical privacy.
Rule suspects she was blacklisted by other providers in her area. She tried to make an appointment with another neurologist, but was told she was “not an appropriate patient.” Her primary care provider sent a back-dated letter to Rule and her mother saying he was dismissing them as patients. That doctor gave no valid reason for the patient abandonment.
TARA RULE (TIKTOK)
Rule is on disability and lives on less than $1,000 per month. Being banned as a patient is a real hardship.
“Now I have to go to Connecticut to see physicians in a different hospital system. Or travel three and a half hours to New York City. With hotels and gas, it’s very hard. Some of these specialists outside the state are not fully covered by my insurance,” Rule said.
Traveling is made more complicated because Rule can’t stay just anywhere — she needs accessible hotel rooms. And she is accumulating thousands of dollars in debt.
After posting her video, Rule heard from many other patients who have also been discriminated against by their doctors. She felt motivated to find out what legal remedies existed.
With legal guidance, Rule wrote the civil rights complaint herself in what is known as a “federal question” lawsuit, an action that seeks to clarify a constitutional issue in US federal court. Rule has been advised that the medical care she sought does not fall under “conscience protections,” which allow doctors to refuse treatment on religious or moral grounds.
In preparation for her lawsuit, Rule obtained her medical and insurance records, to help prove that privacy violations occurred. She discovered she had been billed for services not received, and believes her medical records were forged.
Albany Medical did not respond to a request for comment.
Rule’s lawsuit is potentially precedent-setting. It marks the first federal question case against a medical provider for refusing to provide teratogenic drugs because a woman is of “childbearing age.” Refusing to give routine medical care because a patient might get pregnant is discrimination. Patients cannot be forced into unnecessary restraints on their care.
"I am prepared for whatever happens,” says Rule, who is hopeful her lawsuit will help prevent other patients from being discriminated against by their doctors.
Madora Pennington is the author of the blog LessFlexible.com about her life with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. She graduated from UC Berkeley with minors in Journalism and Disability Studies.
