Miss Understood: How Arthritis Has Changed Me

By: Arlene Grau, Columnist

I've been noticing several changes in myself since turning 30 this past August, most of which are physical and have more to do with my lupus and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). I've never been the type of person who cares about her looks or what people think about me. However, when I began noticing large nodules forming on my fingers and persistent swelling around my wrists and knuckles I became more self-conscious.

It became especially embarrassing one day when I went to share how I had noticed certain nodules getting bigger and a friend said, "Wow that looks gross." I guess in a way I expected her to be more sympathetic about my situation, but some people may never understand.

I have some fingers that I can hardly bend and others that remain stiff for hours. Most of my fingers have become swollen and tender to the touch. I'd say my hands have suffered the most due to my RA and it makes life that much more difficult.

Just a few weeks ago I woke up unable to walk, so I ended up in the hospital. After having x-rays and an MRI, they ended up finding a labral tear and severe arthritis damage in my right hip, hence the reason why I couldn't walk.

I saw an orthopedic surgeon who said I can either have surgery now to repair it or get a cortisone injection to see if it helps temporarily, but based on the amount of damage my hip has I'm going to need a hip replacement in a few years. That news hit me like a ton of bricks.

ARLENE GRAU

ARLENE GRAU

I'm only thirty years old and I already have to mentally prepare myself for a future hip replacement? Not because I fell or because I broke it, but because my arthritis is so advanced that it ate away at my hip. It's a lot to take it. I feel like every time I've gotten tests done, whether its blood work or an MRI, they always find something that I don't want to hear about.

All of this and people still tell me that I don't look sick, they question my illness, or the severity of it. They question why I no longer work or what I do all day. They assume I must be having a wonderful time while my kids are at school. All assumptions because they either enjoy gossiping or they don't want to bother sitting down and getting the facts from me.

At a glance I may look like any other person. But up close you can see that I'm not your average mom or housewife.

My diseases have caused so much to my body. I have so many battle wounds and stories. Some untold, some I've cried about, and some I'm proud I've overcome.

My diseases have changed me. I'm not the same person I was when I was first diagnosed and I don't just mean that in the physical sense. In some ways I'm stronger because I've overcome so much and I'm going to continue fighting. But I also feel like I've aged and I'm tired of all the changes it's brought upon me.

They say change is good, but I don't think they were referring to the type of changes caused by autoimmune diseases.

Arlene Grau lives in southern California with her family. Arlene suffers from rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, lupus, migraine, vasculitis, and Sjogren’s disease.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Arthroscopic Knee Surgery Not Cost-Effective

By Pat Anson, Editor

Another study is raising doubts about the value of arthroscopic knee surgery, a procedure that is routinely used to treat osteoarthritis and other chronic knee problems. Researchers at Western University in Canada say the surgery provides no additional benefit compared to physical therapy, exercise and medication.

Over 250 million people worldwide suffer from knee osteoarthritis (OA), which causes thinning of cartilage and progressive joint damage. Nearly 40 percent of Americans over the age of 45 have some degree of knee OA.

Investigators at Western’s Bone and Joint Institute analyzed the cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic  surgery, a type of “keyhole” surgery in which the surgeon makes a small incision in the knee and inserts a tiny camera and instruments to diagnose and repair damaged ligaments or torn meniscus.

Over 850,000 arthroscopies are performed every year to relieve knee pain in the UK and the United States alone.

"We previously showed in a randomized clinical trial that arthroscopy for knee osteoarthritis provided no benefit over optimized non-operative care. Despite that finding, and subsequent similar studies, the surgery is still commonly performed," says Trevor Birmingham, the Canada Research Chair in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation at Western's Faculty of Health Sciences. "That's why we felt it was important to do the accompanying cost-effectiveness analysis."

The two-year study, published in the journal BMJ Open, found that arthroscopic knee surgery is “not an economically attractive treatment option” compared to non-operative treatments such as physical therapy, exercise and medication. Depending on insurance, hospital charges and the surgeon, arthroscopic surgeries cost about $4,000.

“Patients who received non-operative therapies showed similar improvements in pain, function, and quality of life compared to those who also received surgery, at a significantly lower cost,” says lead author Jacquelyn Marsh, a Post-Doctoral Fellow in Health Economics at Western University.

While most people do feel better after knee arthroscopy, randomized clinical trials found that patients improve to a similar extent when they receive non-operative treatments or ‘sham’ surgery, where the patient receives anesthesia but doesn’t actually receive the surgical treatment.

“When that body of evidence is coupled with the present economic analysis, one has to question whether health care funds would be better spent elsewhere,” said Birmingham.

A 2014 report by a German health organization also found arthroscopic  surgery does not relieve pain any better than physical therapy or over-the-counter pain medications.

Another study published last year in the The BMJ called the benefit of knee surgery “inconsequential.” Researchers in Denmark and Sweden reviewed 9 studies on arthroscopic knee surgeries and found that the surgery provided pain relief for up to six months, but without any significant benefit in physical function. Risks from the surgery are rare, but include deep vein thrombosis, infection, pulmonary embolism, and death.

"It is difficult to support or justify a procedure with the potential for serious harm, even if it is rare, when that procedure offers patients no more benefit than placebo," wrote Professor Andy Carr from Oxford University’s Institute of Musculoskeletal Sciences in an accompanying editorial.

Carr said thousands of lives could be saved if the surgery was discontinued or performed less often.

Supplements Help Relieve Pain of Osteoarthritis

By Pat Anson, Editor

Two natural dietary supplements are effective at relieving pain and stiffness caused by osteoarthritis, without the side effects caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), according to two new research studies.

One study found that a combination of glucosamine and chondroitin was effective in treating knee osteoarthritis (OA), while the other study examined an herbal treatment used for thousands of years in Chinese medicine to treat joint pain.

Osteoarthritis is a progressive joint disorder caused by painful inflammation of soft tissue, which leads to thinning of cartilage and joint damage in the knees, hips, fingers and spine.

The first study was a meta-analysis (a study of studies) involving over 16,000 patients with knee OA. Published in the journal Scientific Reports, it is the first study of its kind to compare glucosamine, chondroitin, and the two in combination, against the NSAID celecoxib or a placebo in the treatment of knee OA.

Researchers found that the combination of glucosamine and chondroitin was associated with significant improvement in pain relief and functional enhancement, compared to placebo, without the high rate of gastrointestinal side effects in patients who received celecoxib.

There was "no significant difference" in pain relief between celecoxib and the glucosamine/chondroitin combination.

"This comprehensive analysis provides us with a wealth of historical data supporting the safety and efficacy of glucosamine and chondroitin in the management of joint health. It is consistent with recent findings suggesting that the efficacy of this combination is comparable to celecoxib in terms of relieving pain and improving function," said lead author Chao Zeng, MD, of the Department of Orthopaedics at Xiangya Hospital at Central South University in Changsha, China.

"This is important news for patients requiring long-term treatment, as the potential side-effect associated with profiles of NSAIDs such as celecoxib warrant consideration of alternative treatment options that are safe and effective."

Glucosamine and chondroitin are both found in healthy cartilage, which acts as a cushion between the bones in a joint. In dietary supplements, glucosamine can be harvested from shells and shellfish or made synthetically. Chondroitin can also be made in a lab, or manufactured from cartilage found in cows, pigs, sharks and other animals.

Chondroitin and glucosamine are popular in supplements used to treat joint pain, but according to the Arthritis Foundation, “most studies assessing their effectiveness show modest to no improvement compared with placebo in either pain relief or joint damage.” The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons also recommends against their use.

The second, smaller study examined the effectiveness of Arthrem, a dietary supplement made in New Zealand that contains an herbal extract from the plant Artemisia annua (Qinghaosu), which has been used in Chinese medicine for more than 2,000 years.

Forty-two people with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip were enrolled in the randomized, controlled study, which was published in the journal Clinical Rheumatology. Researchers say patients who took an Arthrem capsule twice a day for 12 weeks had a significant reduction in pain and stiffness and an increase in their physical function.

"The published results show that the natural product, Arthrem, has potential as an anti-inflammatory/analgesic in osteoarthritis," said Dr. Sheena Hunt, study co-author and principal scientist for Promisia Integrative, the company that makes Arthrem and conducted the study.

"Particularly positive results were observed in a subset of patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis. In this subgroup, the average magnitude of pain after 12 weeks of taking Arthrem was less than half of the value at the start of the study. Arthrem at this dose was also well tolerated with no treatment-related side effects."

Arthrem recently became available in the United States. Those who qualify can sign up for a free, no obligation, two month trial online at www.Arthrem.com.

Compared to pharmaceuticals, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration loosely regulates the $35 billion dietary supplement industry and many manufacturers' claims about their products are unverified.  The agency recently announced plans to tighten enforcement of the industry by creating a dietary supplement office.

The World Health Organization estimates that about 10% of men and 18% of women over age 60 have osteoarthritis.

New Blood Test Predicts Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk

By Pat Anson, Editor

British researchers are developing a new blood test that could predict the likelihood of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) up to 16 years before the onset of symptoms. Such a test would substantially increase the early detection of RA and make treatment more effective.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disease in which the body’s own defenses attack joint tissues, causing pain, inflammation and bone erosion.

Researchers at the Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology at Oxford University developed a blood test that looks for antibodies in a protein called citrullinated tenascin-C (cTNC), which is often found in high levels in the joints of people with RA.  

In a study of over 2,000 patients, the blood test diagnosed RA in about 50% of cases. The test also had a very low rate of false positives.

"What is particularly exciting is that when we looked at samples taken from people before their arthritis began, we could see these antibodies to cTNC up to 16 years before the disease occurred – on average the antibodies could be found seven years before the disease appeared,” said Professor Kim Midwood of the Kennedy Institute.

"This discovery therefore gives us an additional test that can be used to increase the accuracy of the CCP assay and that can predict rheumatoid arthritis, enabling us to monitor people and spot the disease early. This early detection is key because early treatment is more effective."

Early RA treatment focuses on suppressing the immune system to reduce inflammation and slow progression of the disease.

"Early diagnosis is key, with research showing that there's often a narrow window of opportunity following the onset of symptoms for effective diagnosis and control of disease through treatment. Furthermore, current tests for rheumatoid arthritis are limited in their ability to diagnose disease in different patients,” said Stephen Simpson, director of research at Arthritis Research UK, which funded the study.

"This could have great potential to help patients with rheumatoid arthritis get the right treatment early to keep this painful and debilitating condition under control."

A similar diagnostic blood test for RA is already on the market in the United States, Canada, Europe, Japan and Australia. The JOINTstat test looks for another protein called 14-3-3η. A recent study of 149 RA patients in Japan found that serum 14-3-3η levels can predict disease severity and clinical outcomes. Drugs that reduce 14--3-3η levels can delay the onset and severity of RA, and increase the chances of remission.

About 1.5 million Americans and 1% of adults worldwide suffer from RA.

New Skin Patch Delivers Pain Relief with Ibuprofen

By Pat Anson, Editor

There are many different types of skin patches already on the market to treat pain --- containing everything from lidocaine to capsaicin to powerful opioids like fentanyl. Now British researchers say they’re a step closer to developing the first transdermal patch containing ibuprofen.

Researchers at the University of Warwick have formed a company called Medherent to produce and patent an adhesive patch that can deliver a high dose of ibuprofen through the skin for as long as 12 hours to treat conditions such as back pain, arthritis and neuralgia.

Their patch differs from others already on the market because the medication is embedded into the polymer matrix that sticks the patch to the patient’s skin. The embedding technology allows the patch to contain 5 to 10 times the amount of analgesic currently used in medical patches.

"Many commercial patches surprisingly don't contain any pain relief agents at all, they simply soothe the body by a warming effect,” says University of Warwick research chemist Professor David Haddleton.

image courtesy of medherent

image courtesy of medherent

“Our technology now means that we can for the first time produce patches that contain effective doses of active ingredients such as ibuprofen for which no patches currently exist. Also, we can improve the drug loading and stickiness of patches containing other active ingredients to improve patient comfort and outcome."

The researchers are now testing other analgesics to see if they too can be embedded into the polymers. So far they’ve had good results with methyl salicylate – a wintergreen-scented chemical used in some topical liniments and gels.

“We believe that many other over the counter and prescription drugs can exploit our technology and we are seeking opportunities to test a much wider range of drugs and treatments within our patch," says Haddleton.

In an email to Pain News Network, Medherent’s CEO said the technology is compatible with a wide range of drugs, including opioids. The company is currently seeking partners to help develop the patches.

"Our first products will be over-the-counter pain relief patches and through partnering we would expect to have the first of those products on the market in around 2 years,” said Nigel Davis. “In addition to our pain relief products, our technology also works with drugs in many other therapeutic areas. We can see considerable opportunities in working with pharmaceutical companies to develop innovative products using our next generation transdermal drug-delivery platform."

Adding opioids to the mix is tricky business, because some opioid patches already on the market are being abused. According to CBCNews, transdermal patches containing fentanyl are blamed for over 600 deaths in Canada. Addicts have learned they can cut up fentanyl patches to smoke or ingest them  

Asked if Medherent’s patch technology would prevent similar abuse, Davis said, “We hope so but need to do more work on that before we make claims of that sort. “

Decision on Opioid Implant Nears

Meanwhile, Titan Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: TTNP) has announced that the Food and Drug Administration has scheduled a meeting with the company next month to discuss its new drug application for Probuphine, an implant containing buprenorphine, a weak acting opioid used to treat addiction.

Ironically, some addicts have learned they can get high by abusing buprenorphine and it is prized as a street drug that can ease withdrawal pains from heroin. Buprenorphine, which is more widely known under the brand name Suboxone, is currently only available in pills and oral films.

The Probuphine implant would be difficult to abuse. About the size of a matchstick, it is designed to be inserted subcutaneously under the skin of the upper arm, where it can release steady doses of buprenorphine for as long as six months.

Titan and its partner, Braeburn Pharmaceuticals, believe the implant technology could someday be used to deliver other medications, including opioids for pain relief.

image courtesy of titan pharmaceuticals

image courtesy of titan pharmaceuticals

Probuphine’s path to the marketplace hasn’t been a smooth one. Braeburn and Titan were stunned in 2013 when the FDA denied approval of the implant and asked for a new clinical study of Probuphine’s effectiveness. Since then, the companies have conducted a study showing that the implant was more effective than buprenorphine tablets in treating addiction. The companies are hoping for FDA approval in 2016.

Tommie Copper Tarnished By Fed Charges

By Pat Anson, Editor

Some of the shine has come off athletic apparel company Tommie Copper, Inc.

The company has agreed to pay $1.35 million to settle federal charges that it deceptively advertised its copper-infused compression clothing would relieve pain and inflammation caused by arthritis, fibromyalgia and other chronic diseases.

Tommie Copper’s settlement with the Federal Trade Commission also requires the company and founder Thomas Kallish to have “competent and reliable” scientific evidence before making any future claims about pain relief, disease treatment, or the health benefits of their products.

Tommie Cooper advertised its copper-infused garments in infomercials, brochures, social media, and print media such as Arthritis Today magazine. The ads claimed the clothing alleviated pain caused by multiple sclerosis, arthritis, and fibromyalgia; and could provide pain relief comparable to or better than drugs or surgery.

Some of the infomercials feature talk show host Montel Williams, who suffers from multiple sclerosis, declaring, “Tommie Copper truly is pain relief without a pill.”

 “It’s tempting to believe that wearing certain clothing will eliminate severe pain, but Tommie Copper didn’t have science to back its claims,” said Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “If you see an ad for a product that promises to replace the need for drugs or surgery, talk to a healthcare professional before you spend your money.”

The company’s website now only claims its products “can be worn all day to provide relief from everyday aches and pains.” The clothing, including sleeves, braces, shirts and socks, range in price from $29.95 to $69.50.

The proposed federal court order imposes an $86.8 million judgment against Tommie Copper, which will be suspended upon payment of $1.35 million by the company within seven days . The company neither admitted or denied any of the allegations in the settlement.

The so-called “healing power” and pain relieving power of copper can be traced back thousands of years. But a 2013 study by British researchers found that copper does nothing to alleviate the pain, swelling, or disease progression of rheumatoid arthritis. The study, published in PLOS ONE, found that copper bracelets worn by 70 patients provide no more meaningful therapeutic effect than a placebo.

Hospitals Accountable for Joint Replacement Surgeries

By Pat Anson, Editor

Hospitals will be held accountable for the cost and quality of care given to Medicare patients who undergo hip and knee replacement surgery under a pilot program by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Hip and knee replacements are the most common inpatient surgery for Medicare beneficiaries. In 2014, there were more than 400,000 such procedures, costing Medicare more than $7 billion for hospitalizations alone. Post-surgery complications such as pain and infection often lead to hospital readmissions and extended recovery periods.

Under the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, the hospital where the surgery takes place will be accountable for all services from the time of the surgery through 90 days after hospital discharge. This “bundling” of payments for hospitals, physicians, physical therapists and other health providers is meant to encourage them to work together to deliver more effective and efficient care.

Depending on the hospital’s quality and cost performance, the hospital will either earn a financial reward or be required to refund Medicare for a portion of the cost.

The quality and cost of care for hip and knee replacement surgeries can vary greatly. Currently the average Medicare expenditure for surgery, hospitalization, and recovery ranges from $16,500 to $33,000 across geographic areas. The rate of complications from infections or implant failures can be more than three times higher at some facilities than others.

“Incentives to coordinate the whole episode of care – from surgery to recovery – are not strong enough, and a patient’s health may suffer as a result,” CMS said in a statement. “When approaching care without seeing the big picture, there is a risk of missing crucial information or not coordinating across different care settings. This approach leads to more complications after surgery, higher readmission rates, protracted rehabilitative care, and variable costs. These are not the health outcomes patients want.”

The CJR model is being tested in 67 metropolitan areas throughout the country, and nearly all hospitals in those areas are required to participate. Patients will still be able to choose their doctor, hospital, nursing facility, home health service, and other providers. A list of all 67 areas can be found here.

The aging of the U.S. population is causing a surge in hip and knee replacement surgeries. Over a million joint replacement surgeries are currently performed annually – a number expected to surpass four million by 2030. 

Joint replacement surgery is generally conducted on the elderly to relieve pain from osteoarthritis, a painful and disabling condition caused by a loss of cartilage and the degradation of joints. Twenty-seven million Americans suffer from osteoarthritis.

Recent studies have questioned whether many of the surgeries are appropriate. A five year study of 175 knee replacement patients by the National Institutes of Health found that over a third of the surgeries were inappropriate, according to researchers who found that many patients had pain and other symptoms that were too mild to justify having their knees replaced.  Less than half (44%) of the knee replacement surgeries were classified as appropriate, with 22% rated inconclusive and 34% deemed inappropriate.

Miss Understood: Vibrant Trial

(Editor’s note:  Several weeks ago we were contacted by a sales representative for Neurovative Technologies, a Canadian manufacturer of medical devices that use vibration to relieve chronic pain. These “Vibrant” devices sell for about $300 each and, we were told, “have been able to decrease pain and stiffness and increase range of motion in 95% of our OA, RA and Fibromyalgia patients.” The company was invited and agreed to provide a Vibrant device for back pain at no cost to PNN columnist Arlene Grau for a test run. Arlene suffers from fibromylagia and rheumatoid arthritis.)

By Arlene Grau, Columnist

There are many people who suffer the same pain day in and day out with little to no relief from medication, acupuncture, medical devices, etc. My pain begins in my back and spreads throughout my body. Recently, I was asked to give a drug free and non-invasive device called Vibrant a try to see if it helped with some of the pain I was suffering from. I received the device that is designed for back pain management.

During my time using the device, which was about two weeks, I have found that there is no change in my pain level or relief for my back pain.

The device is recommended for use in 16 minute sessions.  It can be used as many times as you'd like during the day, however it is not recommended that anyone use it for an extended period of time all at once.

It is extremely easy to use. You just push the “on” button and it does all the work. It also comes with a charger and backpack for storing or carrying, which I thought was pretty neat.

The Vibrant device reminded me of a massage chair, but I kept wanting to raise the level of intensity and couldn't because it doesn't come with that feature.

It did however help relieve minor aches and pains related to everyday life. My husband even tried it and said that he found it to be relaxing.

I also have a TENS unit which was prescribed by my pain management doctor and I feel like I get a lot more relief from that than the Vibrant device. As far as being able to target my pain and getting deep down into the problem areas, I feel like the Vibrant device fell short.

It's possible that it's meant for smaller aches and pains, but as far as rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia patients go, there really are no minor pains related to our diseases.

Arlene Grau lives in southern California. She suffers from rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, lupus, migraine, vasculitis, and Sjogren’s disease.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Exercise Improves Pain and Mobility of Seniors

By Pat Anson, Editor

A low-impact exercise program can significantly reduce pain and improve mobility for older adults with arthritis and other musculoskeletal conditions, according to the Hospital for Special Surgery (HHS) in New York City.

For several years HHS has offered exercise programs at senior centers in Chinatown, Flushing, and Queens – and tracked the health of those who participated. The hospital’s most recent findings are being presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology/Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals in San Francisco.

"Getting seniors to be active in any way will generally improve their quality of life and help them function better in their everyday activities," said Linda Russell, MD, a rheumatologist and chair of the Public and Patient Education Advisory Committee at HHS. "People believe that if you have arthritis you shouldn't exercise, but appropriate exercises actually help decrease pain."

The eight-week exercise programs began in 2011 and are held once a week. They were originally developed for Asian seniors 65 and older, many of whom lived in poverty and suffered from musculoskeletal conditions.

The low-impact exercises included pilates, yoga, yoga-lates (a combination of yoga and pilates), t’ai chi and dance, and were led by certified instructors.

In surveys of over 200 participants, most reported that they experienced less pain and were better able to perform activities of daily living. Muscle and joint pain were reduced by nearly a third and mobility improved dramatically:

  • 88% more participants could climb several flights of stairs
  • 66% more participants could lift/carry groceries
  • 63% more participants could bend, kneel, or stoop
  • 91% of participants felt the program reduced their fatigue
  • 97% of participants felt that the program reduced their stiffness
  • 95% of participants felt their balance improved
  • 96% of participants felt more confident that exercising would not make their symptoms worse

"The study results indicate that the hospital's Bone Health Initiative has a positive impact on the musculoskeletal health of the Asian senior population," said Huijuan Huang, MPA, program coordinator. "Providing free exercise programs to the community can play an important role in helping adults manage musculoskeletal conditions."

An earlier study at HHS found that exercise decreases pain, reduces the severity and frequency of falls, and improves the balance of people suffering from osteoarthritis. Exercise also improved their quality and enjoyment of life.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Raises Death Risk

By Pat Anson, Editor

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is not only painful and disabling – new research indicates it raises the risk of an early death, especially for patients with seropositive RA.

In a study of nearly 1,000 women with RA, researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) in Boston found that RA significantly increased the women’s risk of death from cardiovascular and respiratory disease. The women are enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study, which has followed more than 100,000 female registered nurses since 1976.

"Because the Nurses' Health Study is so large and has been following participants for so long, we were able to gather much more information about our subjects - we could follow them before and after diagnosis, take their health behaviors into account and determine specific causes of death. By doing so, we found strong evidence of increased risk for respiratory, cardiovascular and overall mortality for patients with RA," said lead author Jeffrey Sparks, MD, a physician in BWH's Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy.

RA is a chronic autoimmune disease in which the body’s own defenses attack joint tissues, causing swelling, inflammation and bone erosion. Because RA is incurable, treatments focus on suppressing the immune system to reduce inflammation and slow progression of the disease.

Sparks and his colleagues evaluated 964 women in the Nurses’ Health Study and compared their mortality rates to women in the study without RA. The team controlled for other risk factors, including smoking, a known cause of respiratory and cardiovascular mortality, as well as age, body mass index, physical activity and diet.

They found that RA was associated with a 40 percent increased risk of death and that many RA patients died of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Researchers also looked at differences between the two types of RA, "seropositive" and "seronegative." Patients with seropositive RA have auto-antibodies related to RA, and generally have more severe symptoms. The team found that participants with seropositive RA had nearly three times the risk of respiratory mortality than women who did not have RA. Seronegative RA was not significantly associated with increased risk of respiratory mortality.

"We found that whether participants with RA were seropositive or seronegative really mattered - those who were seropositive were at higher risk, particularly for respiratory mortality," said Sparks. "We hope that this study will encourage patients and clinicians to be more aware that patients with RA are at increased risk of both respiratory and cardiovascular mortality, particularly patients with seropositive RA."

A recent study by researchers in Mexico found that RA patients with no prior symptoms of heart disease were at higher risk of a heart attack. Their risk was higher even without other cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking and diabetes.

Many health experts believe the inflammation triggered by RA in the joints may cause inflammation throughout the body, including the heart’s coronary arteries.

According to the Arthritis Foundation, more than 50 percent of premature deaths in people with rheumatoid arthritis result from cardiovascular disease. The heightened risk of heart disease applies to all forms of arthritis, including osteoarthritis, gout, lupus and psoriatic arthritis.

Researchers Say Chronic Pain Changes Brain Chemistry

By Pat Anson, Editor

A new study by UK researchers raises an intriguing question: Does chronic pain change brain chemistry and make pain more tolerable?

The answer is yes, according to a small study at the University of Manchester. Researchers there used Positron Emission Tomography imaging (PET scans) to measure the spread of opioid receptors in the brains of 17 arthritis sufferers and nine healthy control subjects

When they applied heat to the skin of study participants to induce pain, researchers found that the more opioid receptors they had, the higher their ability was to withstand pain. The number of opioid receptors was highest in arthritis sufferers, suggesting their brain chemistry had changed in response to chronic pain.

"As far as we are aware, this is the first time that these changes have been associated with increased resilience to pain and shown to be adaptive,” said Dr. Christopher Brown. "Although the mechanisms of these adaptive changes are unknown, if we can understand how we can enhance them, we may find ways of naturally increasing resilience to pain without the side effects associated with many pain killing drugs."

image courtesy of university of manchester

image courtesy of university of manchester

It’s been known for a long time that we have receptors in our brains that respond to natural endogenous opioids such as endorphins. Those same receptors also respond to opioid pain medications.

Some people seem to cope better with pain than others, and knowing more about their resilience and coping mechanisms may lead to the development of new ways of treating pain.

"This is very exciting because it changes the way we think about chronic pain,” said Anthony Jones, a professor and director of the Manchester Pain Consortium. "There is generally a rather negative and fatalistic view of chronic pain. This study shows that although the group as a whole are more physiologically vulnerable, the whole pain system is very flexible and that individuals can adaptively upregulate their resilience to pain.

"It may be that some simple interventions can further enhance this natural process, and designing smart molecules or simple non-drug interventions to do a similar thing is potentially attractive."

Researchers at Stanford University in California have also been studying this subject, trying to learn why some chronic pain sufferers are more resilient to pain.

I think this study emphasizes some very important points about pain resilience,” said Dr. Drew Sturgeon, a fellow in the Stanford University Pain Management Center and Stanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Laboratory. “If you think about chronic pain as something that poses a constant challenge and requires frequent adaptation, it makes sense that we would see changes in the brain that correspond with this process.  We see it frequently from a psychological standpoint, where people are able to learn and develop better strategies for coping with pain and reduce their fear and negative thoughts about pain after dealing with it for a while.”

Sturgeon and his colleagues say resilience may also stem from an enhanced ability to enjoy the rewarding parts of life – which makes it easier to cope with pain.  

“The idea would be that if a person had more opioid receptors available they would be more sensitive to the good stuff in life, and therefore more motivated by pleasurable experiences, such as spending time with friends, exercising -- rewards that get us back on the road to living a meaningful life,” said Beth Darnall, PhD, a pain psychologist, clinical associate professor at Stanford University and author of Less Pain, Fewer Pills.

“Theoretically, people who are known to be resilient probably have more endogenous opioids -- or they have made choices in life to optimize their experience of endogenous opioids and therefore have honed an internal reward system.”

Whatever the cause of resilience, many patients hope further studies will uncover new ways of treating pain.

"As a patient who suffers chronic pain from osteoarthritis, I am extremely interested in this research. I feel I have developed coping mechanisms to deal with my pain over the years, yet still have to take opioid medication to relieve my symptoms,” said Val Derbyshire. “The notion of enhancing the natural opiates in the brain, such as endorphins, as a response to pain, seems to me to be infinitely preferable to long term medication with opiate drugs.”

The University of Manchester study is being published in Pain, the official journal of the International Association of the Study of Pain.

Drug Shows Promise for Treating Psoriatic Arthritis

By Pat Anson, Editor

An injectable drug used to treat plaque psoriasis may also be effective in treating psoriatic arthritis, according to new research published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Secukinumab – which is sold by Novartis under the brand name Cosentyx – helped reduce swollen joints in a double-blind Phase III study involving over 600 patients with psoriatic arthritis. Treatment with Cosentyx resulted in rapid and significant improvements in about half of the patients compared to a placebo.

The study was neither large enough or long enough to evaluate side effects associated with long-term use of Cosentyx.

Psoriatic arthritis is a form of arthritis that affects about a third of people who have psoriasis — a condition that features red skin lesions. Joint pain, stiffness and swelling are the main symptoms of psoriatic arthritis, which can affect any part of the body, including the fingertips and spine.  

No cure for psoriatic arthritis exists, so the focus is on controlling symptoms and preventing further damage to joints.

Cosentyx was approved in Europe early this year as a first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The drug is also approved in the U.S. as a treatment for plaque psoriasis in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy (light therapy).

Novartis has applied for Cosentyx to be used as a treatment for psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

Psoriatic arthritis can develop at any time, but it most commonly appears between the ages of 30 and 50, according to the National Psoriasis Foundation. Genes, the immune system and environmental factors all appear to play a role in the onset of the disease. About 10 percent of people inherit one or more of the genes that could eventually lead to psoriasis, but only 2 to 3 percent actually develop the disease.

Yoga Reduces Chronic Pain of Arthritis

By Pat Anson, Editor

A few weeks of yoga can significantly improve the health and mental well-being of people suffering from the two most common forms of arthritis, according to a new study at Johns Hopkins University.

Researchers found that 8 weeks of yoga classes reduced pain and improved the energy, mood and physical activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or knee osteoarthritis. The study, published in the Journal of Rheumatology, is believed to be the largest randomized trial to examine the effect of yoga on the physical and psychological health of arthritis sufferers.

"There's a real surge of interest in yoga as a complementary therapy, with 1 in 10 people in the U.S. now practicing yoga to improve their health and fitness," said Susan Bartlett, PhD, an adjunct associate professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins and associate professor at McGill University.

"Yoga may be especially well suited to people with arthritis because it combines physical activity with potent stress management and relaxation techniques, and focuses on respecting limitations that can change from day to day."

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease in which the body’s own defenses attack joint tissues, causing pain, inflammation and bone erosion. About 1.5 million Americans and 1% of adults worldwide suffer from RA.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is even more common and affects over 250 million people worldwide. Nearly 40 percent of Americans over the age of 45 have some degree of knee OA, which causes thinning of cartilage and progressive joint damage.

Johns Hopkins researchers recruited 75 sedentary adults with either knee osteoarthritis or RA. Participants were randomly assigned to either a wait list or eight weeks of twice-weekly yoga classes, plus a weekly practice session at home. Their physical and mental well-being were assessed before and after the yoga sessions by researchers who did not know which group the participants had been assigned to.

Those doing yoga reported a 20% improvement in pain, energy levels, mood and physical function, including their ability to complete physical tasks. Walking speed also improved to a lesser extent, though there was little difference between the groups in tests of balance and upper body strength. Improvements in those who completed yoga were still apparent nine months later.

"For people with other conditions, yoga has been shown to improve pain, pain-related disability and mood," said Clifton Bingham III, MD, associate professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and director of the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center.

"But there were no well-controlled trial of yoga that could tell us if it was safe and effective for people with arthritis, and many health professionals have concerns about how yoga might affect vulnerable joints given the emphasis on changing positions and on being flexible. Our first step was to ensure that yoga was reasonable and safe option for people with arthritis.”

Participants were screened by their doctors prior to joining the study, and continued to take their regular arthritis medication. Instructors in the yoga classes also had additional training to modify poses to accommodate people with limited physical ability.

“Find a teacher who asks the right questions about limitations and works closely with you as an individual. Start with gentle yoga classes. Practice acceptance of where you are and what your body can do on any given day," Bingham said.

New Wearable Devices for Chronic Pain

By Pat Anson, Editor

With opioid pain medications becoming harder to get and many patients looking for safer alternatives with fewer side effects, a growing number of companies are offering wearable “electrotherapy” devices for pain relief.

There’s the Cefaly headband for migraines, ActiPatch for sore muscles, AcuKnee for osteoarthritis, and the Quell nerve stimulator, which is designed to treat a range of chronic pain conditions. All are part of a fast growing $2.8 billion market for wearable medical devices.

“There’s a big problem brewing on the horizon. And that is the pain medications are being removed from the market, slowly but surely,” says Phillip Muccio, President and founder of Axiobionics, which has been making customized electrotherapy devices for 20 years.

“Electrical stimulation has a way of reaching into the body and interacting and coordinating what happens to the body. That’s why it a fascinating area of medicine because not a lot of things will do that, especially non-invasively and non-pharmacologically.”

Most of the new devices use a form of electrical stimulation to block or mask pain signals – a technique developed decades ago known as Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS).

Unlike the old TENS units, which are typically used for about 30 minutes, wearable devices are designed to be worn for several hours at a time or even while sleeping.

image courtesy of axiobionics

image courtesy of axiobionics

“TENS is like a short acting opioid. It’s basically only effective when it’s on,” said Shai Gozani, MD, President and CEO of Neurometrix. “If you’re going to deal with chronic pain, you have to have a wearable, chronically usable device, because pain can be two hours a day or it could be 24 hours a day. TENS devices historically haven’t been designed at all for wear-ability or continuous use.”

Neurometrix recently introduced Quell, an electrotherapy device that Gozani compares to a spinal cord stimulator. But instead of being surgically implanted near the spine like a stimulator, Quell is worn externally on the upper calf below the knee.

image courtesy of neurometrix

image courtesy of neurometrix

“We really look at spinal cord stimulation as the model. We’re trying to make that available but in a non-invasive, wearable way -- versus TENS devices which are really intended for local muscle stimulation. We don’t stimulate the muscles, we stimulate the nerve alone,” Gozani told Pain News Network.

“The upper calf has a lot of nerves. It’s comfortable. It’s discrete. So it meets the requirement to have a large segment of nerves to stimulate, but it’s also highly usable from a wear-ability perspective.”

A small study recently conducted by Neurometrix found that over 80% of Quell users had a significant reduction in pain and two-thirds were able to reduce the amount of pain medication they were taking.  Participants in the study had several different types of of chronic pain, including fibromyalgia, sciatica, neuropathy and arthritis.

When it comes to clinical studies, medical device makers have a clear advantage over pharmaceutical companies, which often have to spend years and tens of millions of dollars proving the safety and effectiveness of their drugs before they’re approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Device makers are held to a lower regulatory standard.

“Devices are approved by FDA basically for safety and not necessarily for efficacy. It’s a lot easier to demonstrate that with a device than if you have to demonstrate a new drug. You basically run one study or two and show that nobody got electrocuted by a TENS unit and you’re good to go,” said Bob Twillman, PhD, Executive Director of the American Academy of Pain Management.

Device makers can even get fast track approval from the FDA without any clinical studies -- if they say a new device is substantially equivalent to an older device already on the market.  Quell, for example, was given clearance by the FDA because of its similarity to Sensus, another Neurometrix device that's worn below the knee for pain relief.

A significant disadvantage for device makers is that most are not covered by public or private health insurers – meaning patients have to pay for them out of pocket. Three years ago, Medicare stopped covering TENS for low back pain, saying the technology was “not reasonable and necessary.”

The lack of reimbursement also makes many doctors unwilling to prescribe wearable devices and unfamiliar with the technology behind them, which stifles innovation.  For that reason, Neurometrix took an unconventional path and made Quell available without a prescription – bypassing insurers and doctors so it could market directly to consumers for $249 a unit.

“We thought it was imperative to get it over the counter. We wanted to make sure it was accessible to patients," said Gozani. "Wear-ability changes everything. Wear-ability is the game changer in terms of optimizing pain relief. I think it's huge."

Miss Understood: A Taste of Remission

By: Arlene Grau, Columnist

If you ask me to plan something, almost anything that requires me being somewhere on a certain day for any amount of time, I would have to decline because I never know how I'll be feeling on any given day.

Now ask me to plan a family vacation that would take me to Hawaii, where I would be 5 hours away from my doctor by plane – well, that would be insane.

However, I did just that and the results were better than expected.

I had my Rituxan infusion a month prior to leaving in hopes that it would kick in just before I left. My body, however, had a different agenda. I began feeling ill the week after my treatment. On top of that, I suffered a bad fall at home. I sprained my ankle, bruised my hip, and hurt my knee.

Instead of making progress, I was taking several steps backwards. I had tried to prepare my body for months and it was beginning to feel like it was all in vain.

But my husband and doctor didn't allow me to give up. My doctor prepared an emergency plan for me before I left. He prescribed backup antibiotics in case I became ill, started me on a temporary prednisone dosage, printed up my most recent patient summary (since I was taking so many medications with me), and gave me contact information for a rheumatologist in Hawaii in the event that I needed to be seen. He even called the other doctor ahead of time and told me to email him for anything.

20150829_182849.jpg

Although my body wasn't completely ready, I felt like I had the tools necessary to handle any medical emergency I may have.

Now, I don't know if it was the simple fact that I removed myself from all the stressors in my life, but I felt so much better while I was in Hawaii during that one week than I have since I was first diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis eight years ago.

My theory is that the change in climate helped with the inflammation I was suffering from. I know that when it's very cold and dry, I tend to flare up and feel very ill. And when it's really hot and the sun is pounding down on me, I feel my weakest and just as sick.

But out there I was met with humidity and sunlight that didn't feel like it was stripping away every ounce of energy I had.

I had one or two trying days; granted I was doing a lot more than I've ever done at home as far as activities and walking go. But I was extremely proud of everything I was participating in. I even got to enjoy my 30th birthday in Hawaii, one I never thought I would live to see.

I knew as soon as we got home that something was different because I woke up feeling like I had been hit by a truck. As quickly as the swelling and inflammation left, it returned. My insomnia is back and my migraines are more intense.

But I got taste of what remission might be like.

It was a great vacation with a bittersweet ending because, instead of dreaming about the visual paradise I was in, I'm left day dreaming about the physical paradise I felt -- the one that had less limitations and more of my old self.

Arlene Grau lives in southern California. She suffers from rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, lupus, migraine, vasculitis, and Sjogren’s disease.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.