The Fentanyl Exposure Myth Must End
/By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist
There is a pervasive belief that exposure to even a speck of illicit fentanyl can be immediately life-threatening. The most recent example is a story from USA Today.
“Dramatic body camera footage shows that a sheriff’s deputy in California nearly died after being exposed to fentanyl at an arrest last month,” the story begins, explaining that Deputy David Faiivae collapsed after finding a “white substance” in the trunk of a suspect’s car on July 3.
Faiivae appears to be revived by his training officer with a nasal spray of naloxone, an anti-overdose medication. The body camera video of the incident was so dramatic, the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department turned it into a training video:
There are reasons to be cautious with stories like this. Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid responsible for tens of thousands of overdose deaths, but experts say it’s not nearly as dangerous as it is often portrayed.
"You can't just touch fentanyl and overdose," Ryan Marino, medical director for toxicology and addiction at University Hospitals in Cleveland told NBC News. "It doesn't just get into the air and make people overdose.
"We have a lot of scientific evidence and a good knowledge of chemical laws and the way that these drugs work that says this is impossible."
Casual contact with fentanyl is not generally life-threatening. As Marino explains in a guide for first responders, fentanyl powder is not absorbed through the skin and powdered opioids do not aerosolize.
This is a well-founded view. Drs. Lewis Nelson and Jeanmarie Perrone wrote in STAT News that “there is clear evidence that passive exposure to fentanyl does not result in clinical toxicity.”
But stories of passive exposure to fentanyl being life-threatening are becoming more common. Google Trends shows a rapid uptick from 2017 onward after media coverage of an Ohio patrol officer supposedly overdosing on fentanyl after brushing a bit of powder from his shirt.
According to a 2020 study in the International Journal of Drug Policy, there were 551 news articles in 48 states about casual contact with fentanyl from 2015 to 2019. The reports received about 450,000 Facebook shares, potentially reaching nearly 70 million people.
“Fueled by misinformation, fentanyl panic has harmed public health through complicating overdose rescue while rationalizing hyper-punitive criminal laws, wasteful expenditures, and proposals to curtail vital access to pain pharmacotherapy,” the study found.
If passive exposure to fentanyl were as risky as media and law enforcement suggest, wouldn’t there be a flood of bodies from illicit drug operations? Drug labs do not operate with robust safety measures and street dealers handle drugs in ways that would make passive exposure inevitable. Deaths result when fentanyl is ingested, not from casual contact.
The misperceptions of passive exposure risks are impacting law enforcement, emergency services and medical care. As a result, pharmacy professor Lucas Hill joined with Marino and others to write an open letter this week to media outlets called “Retraction Request for Dangerous Drug Misinformation.”
“We are issuing this letter to request a retraction and correction of your recent article which perpetuates a myth: that casual contact with potent synthetic opioids such as fentanyl poses a health risk to first responders. This is dangerous misinformation that can cause harm both to people who use opioids and to members of the law enforcement community. We greatly appreciate your cooperation in addressing this error.”
The letter is the latest attempt to reduce the harms of media misinformation about drugs. But as with so many things involving drugs, mythology drives too much of the media and law enforcement narrative.
Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.
