Pam Bondi to Join Trump Opioid Commission

By Pat Anson, Editor

Less than three weeks before its final report is due, President Trump’s opioid commission is getting a new member --   Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Bondi is a longtime supporter of the president, served as a member of his transition team, and was once rumored to be the next head of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. There was speculation back in March that Bondi would be named to the opioid commission, but it was not until last week that the White House confirmed it was President Trump's "intent to appoint" Bondi to the panel, which currently has five members.

Curiously, Bondi’s office blamed New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, the chair of the opioid commission, for the six month delay in getting her on board. Both Bondi and Christie are lame ducks serving out their final months in elected office.

“The President always intended for the Attorney General to be on the Commission – however, Governor Christie choose (sic) to begin the Commission with only himself and four others,” Whitney Ray, Bondi’s spokesman, said in an email.

“The announcement (of Bondi's appointment) is protocol before the Executive Order is signed next week. The Attorney General will continue to work with President Trump, General Kelly, Kellyanne Conway and other leaders to combat the national opioid epidemic.“

Bondi's spokesman also reportedly said that the October 1 deadline for the commission to release its final report would be extended. No such announcement has been made and the White House website still doesn’t list Bondi as a commission member.

FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL PAM BONDI

The Trump administration has also yet to issue an official declaration that the opioid crisis is a national emergency – something the President said he would do over a month ago.  

"The opioid crisis is an emergency, and I am saying, officially right now, it is an emergency. It's a national emergency. We're going to spend a lot of time, a lot of effort and a lot of money on the opioid crisis,” Trump said on August 10.

Bondi played a prominent in shutting down Florida’s pill mills several years ago, but critics say she has been slow to acknowledge that the opioid crisis has shifted away from prescription painkillers to heroin and illicit fentanyl.

“The problem is Bondi isn't doing enough about the heroin epidemic,” the Miami Sun Sentinel said in an editorial.  “Considering that Bondi was once touted as a potential Trump drug czar — and infamously failed to investigate Trump University after receiving a major donation from Trump — it's no surprise that she was named to the commission. But she's still living off her reputation from the pill mill crack down.

“In fact, if you Google Bondi and heroin, by far the most you'll read about is when she slammed a drug dealer for stamping Trump's name on a batch of heroin. You won't find any solutions to our crisis.”

In a recent interview with WMBB-TV, Bondi warned that drug dealers were putting heroin and illicit fentanyl into counterfeit medications.

"It's a national epidemic and it truly affects everyone, and parents need to really warn their kids, their teens, adults need to know, never take a pill from someone you don't know, even if they say it is a Tylenol, an Advil or an aspirin. Don't take anything from someone who you don't know," said Bondi.

The initial focus of Trump's opioid commission has been on educating, preventing and treating opioid addiction. An interim report released by the commission in July recommends increased access to addiction treatment, mandatory education for prescribers on the risks and benefits of opioids, and increased efforts to detect and stop the flow of illicit fentanyl into the country.

There are no specific recommendations aimed at reducing access to prescription opioids, although they could be added to the commission’s final report.

In addition to Gov. Christie, commission members include Gov. Charlie Baker of Massachusetts, Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina, Bertha Madras, PhD, a professor of psychobiology at Harvard Medical School, and Patrick Kennedy, a former Rhode Island congressman. No pain patients, pain management experts or practicing physicians were appointed to the panel.

Is This the Opioid of the Future?

By Pat Anson, Editor

What do you call a pain reliever that doesn't have a name yet, is not FDA approved and may not be available for years?

Nektar Therapeutics calls it the "opioid of the future."

Nektar is a research-based pharmaceutical company that has developed a new type of opioid medication that shows promise in relieving moderate to severe pain, but without the risk of abuse and addiction of traditional opioids like oxycodone or hydrocodone.

The experimental pill -- which for the time being is called NKTR-181 --  has recieved “fast track” designation  from the Food and Drug Administration, but is at least a couple of years away from full FDA approval and a commercial launch.

That hasn't stopped Nektar from promoting NKTR-181. This week it hosted a lunch symposium on the drug at PainWeek -- an industry trade show underway in Las Vegas -- a sign of just how confident the company is that NKTR-181 will receive final approval from the FDA.

"We think we could see approval as early as the end of next year," says Steve Doberstein, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer of Nektar. "So we could see a launch of this product in the first part of 2019. That would be my aspiration. If we have to do more clinical trial work, it would be delayed."

The FDA usually requires at least two "Phase 3" clinical studies to prove a new drug's effectiveness. Nektar has only completed one -- a Phase 3 study of over 600 patients with chronic back pain who reported that their pain scores dropped by an average of 65% when taking NKTR-181 twice daily.

Nektar has also completed smaller safety studies that found recreational drug users had significantly less “drug liking” of NKTR-181 -- even at high doses -- when compared oxycodone. Participants also had less daytime sleepiness and fewer withdrawal symptoms.

"NKTR-181 is quite boring as far as abuse metrics go. Boring is good. That was our goal. It doesn't appear to cause euphoria," says Doberstein.

NKTR-181 is "boring" because of its slow rate of entry into the brain's central nervous system – which significantly reduces the “high” or euphoric effect that recreational users seek. Many pain sufferers don't feel that high when taking opioid medication, they just get pain relief. But in the current regulatory and political climate, the only way a new opioid will be approved by the FDA is if it has a low or non-existent abuse potential.

"We're very focused on the fact that one of the building blocks of solving this problem is going to be a safe pain medication for chronic pain patients to take," Doberstein told PNN. "The things that work best are opioids. But the existing conventional old-fashioned opioids -- oxycodone is 100 years old -- come with an unacceptable side effect profile for many patients. And we think we've made something that is legitimately better. It's the first time in a very long time that a new opioid molecule has been developed."  

Doberstein thinks NKTR-181 has such low potential for abuse that it will not need to come in an abuse deterrent formula that would make it harder to crush or liquefy. The FDA could still require one, however, which would delay the drug's commercialization even longer. The agency is currently reviewing the effectiveness of all drugs with abuse deterrent formulas.

The FDA also has a new opioid policy steering committee that is examining whether the agency sufficiently considers the risk of abuse during its evaluation of new opioids.  That could result in rule changes that Nektar would have to address. Anti-opioid activists and politicians could also pressure the FDA to require more clinical studies on the safety and potential abuse of NKTR-181.

Another potential obstacle is that Nektar still needs to partner with a larger pharmaceutical company to help produce and commercialize NKTR-181 -- which is when the no-name "opioid of the future" will likely get a makeover with a branded name to make it more marketable.

"This is the kind of medicine that we think could be quite significant. It could really change medical practice. That means we need a lot of education, and a lot of outreach to physicians, hospitals, payers, patient advocates and law enforcement. We have a lot to do. And its probably beyond us to do it ourselves. So we'll have a commercialization partner of some kind," said Doberstein, who told PNN he expects Nektar to announce its new partnership by the end of the year.

How Fish Got Hooked on Hydrocodone

By Pat Anson, Editor

We hear it all the time from PNN readers. They don’t trust academic research about opioids and addiction, and feel much of it is biased or just plain fishy.

You can certainly say the latter about a new study by researchers at the University of Utah.

They devised a system that allows zebrafish, a small tropical fish popular in home aquariums, to self-administer doses of the painkiller hydrocodone. In less than a week, researchers say the fish were hooked on hydrocodone and showed signs of drug-seeking behavior and withdrawal.

"We didn't know if zebrafish would be a relevant model for opioid addiction, much less self-administer the drug," said Randall Peterson, PhD, a professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology, and senior author of the study published in the journal Behavioral Brain Research.

"What is exciting about this work is that we see many of the hallmarks of addiction in zebrafish. This could be a useful and powerful model."

How is this useful and how does it relate to people?

Zebrafish have more in common with people than you might think. They have 70 percent of the genes that humans have, including similar biological pathways that can lead to addiction. Like people, zebrafish have a μ-opioid receptor and two neurotransmitters, dopamine and glutamate, that trigger the natural reward system in the brain.

"Drugs of abuse target the pathways of the pleasure centers very effectively," said first author Gabriel Bossé, PhD. "These pathways are conserved in zebrafish, and the fish can experience some of the same signs of addiction and withdrawal as people."

Bossé and Peterson tested their system in a tank with a food dispenser equipped with a motion detector that the fish could trigger by swimming nearby. It didn’t take long for the zebrafish to learn how to get food.

Then the researchers removed the food dispenser and replaced it with one that injected small doses of hydrocodone into the water when a fish swam nearby. A continuous flow of water flushed the tank, which forced the fish to trigger the dispenser to receive another dose of hydrocodone.

Over the course of five days, the fish learned how to self-administer the drug. You can watch a demonstration below:

"The fish needed to perform an action to get the drug rather than receiving it passively," said Bossé. "Drug-seeking has been modeled before in rodents and primates, but having a model to study this in zebrafish could move the [study of addiction] forward."

The drug-seeking behavior increased when the zebrafish were forced to receive the opioid in progressively shallower water, a stressful environment that unconditioned fish would normally avoid.

"This was important, because we forced the fish to do more work to receive the drug, and they were more than willing to do more work," said Peterson.

The researchers took their experiment a step further by exposing the conditioned fish to naloxone, a drug used to treat overdoses that blocks opioid receptors. Sure enough, naloxone appeared to reduce the fish’s drug-seeking behavior.

The researchers believe their zebrafish model can lead to new drug therapies, because it can be used to rapidly test thousands of different chemical compounds. They also believe the genetic make-up of zebrafish can be altered to explore the specific biological pathways associated with addiction.

Zebrafish do have other qualities humans can learn from. Researchers at Duke University are studying proteins that enable a zebrafish to completely heal its spine -- even after it was severed. They hope this knowledge will someday lead to new therapies to repair damaged spinal cords in humans.

Trump Declares Opioid Crisis National Emergency

By Pat Anson, Editor

President Donald Trump said he would declare the opioid crisis a national emergency, just two days after his administration said a declaration wasn’t necessary.

"The opioid crisis is an emergency, and I am saying, officially right now, it is an emergency. It's a national emergency. We're going to spend a lot of time, a lot of effort and a lot of money on the opioid crisis,” Trump said outside the clubhouse of his golf course in Bedminster, New Jersey.  “We’re going to draw it up and we’re going to make it a national emergency. It is a serious problem the likes of which we have never had.”

In a brief statement after the President’s remarks, the White House said Trump had instructed the administration “to use all appropriate emergency and other authorities to respond to the crisis caused by the opioid epidemic.”

An estimated 142 Americans are dying every day from drug overdoses of all kinds, not just opioids. Prescription painkillers are often blamed as the cause of the problem, although deaths linked to opioid medication have leveled off in recent years. Heroin and illicit fentanyl are currently driving the overdose crisis and in some states are involved in over half of the overdose deaths.  

A White House commission last week urged the president to declare a national emergency, but administration officials indicated as recently as Tuesday that such a declaration wasn’t necessary because the administration was already treating the opioid crisis as an emergency.

“We believe at this point that the resources that we need or the focus that we need to bring to bear to the opioid crisis at this point can be addressed without the declaration of an emergency, although all things are on the table for the president,” said Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who chairs the opioid commission, applauded the apparent change of heart.

“It is a national emergency and the President has confirmed that through his words and actions today, and he deserves great credit for doing so. As I have said before, I am completely confident that the President will address this problem aggressively and do all he can to alleviate the suffering and loss of scores of families in every corner of our country,” Christie said in a statement.

“This declaration is only one of many steps we must take on the federal level to reduce the death toll and help people achieve long-term recovery – but it’s a start. I’m committed to working with the President and my fellow commissioners to end the opioid overdose epidemic,” said commission member and former congressman Patrick Kennedy.

It was not immediately clear what steps the administration will take now that an emergency has been declared. A 10-page interim report released by the opioid commission recommends increased access to addiction treatment, mandatory education for prescribers on the risks and benefits of opioids, and increased efforts to detect and stop the flow of illicit fentanyl into the country.

There are no specific recommendations aimed at reducing access to prescription opioids, although they could be added to the commission’s final report, which is due in October. Prescriptions for opioid medication – long a target of addiction treatment and anti-opioid activists – have been in decline for several years. The DEA has plans to reduce the supply of many painkillers even more in 2018.

Other measures recommended by the commission:

• Grant waivers to states to eliminate barriers to mental health and addiction treatment
• Increase availability of naloxone as an emergency treatment for opioid overdoses
• Amend the Controlled Substance Act to require additional training in pain management for all prescribers
• Prioritize funding to Homeland Security, FBI and DEA to quickly develop fentanyl detection sensors
• Stop the flow of synthetic opioids through the U.S. Postal Service
• Enhance the sharing of data between prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs)

No estimate was provided on the cost of any of these measures.

In a statement on Tuesday, President Trump suggested that law enforcement and abstinence should be used to address the opioid crisis. 

“The best way to prevent drug addiction and overdose is to prevent people from abusing drugs in the first place. If they don’t start, they won't have a problem.  If they do start, it's awfully tough to get off," Trump said, according to a White House transcript.

Why Heroin Overdoses Are Worse Than We Thought

By Pat Anson, Editor

The number of Americans who died from opioid overdoses – particularly from heroin – is significantly higher than previously reported, according to a new study published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Researchers at the University of Virginia refined the overdose data from 2014 death certificates and estimated that overdose death rates nationally were 24 percent higher for opioids and 22 percent higher for heroin. Deaths involving heroin were substantially underreported in Pennsylvania, Indiana, New Jersey, Louisiana, and Alabama.

A major weakness of the study is that it does not differentiate between opioid pain medication that was prescribed legally, and prescription opioids or illegal opioids that were obtained illicitly. All “opioids” are lumped together in one category.

Virtually every study about drug overdoses is flawed in some way, because each state has different rules and procedures for death certificates. The expertise of county coroners and medical examiners can also vary widely.

There were over 47,000 fatal overdoses nationwide among U.S. residents in 2014. However, about one-quarter of the death certificates failed to note the specific drug involved in an overdose.

“A crucial step to developing policy to combat the fatal drug epidemic is to have a clear understanding of geographic differences in heroin and opioid-related mortality rates. The information obtained directly from death certificates understates these rates because the drugs involved in the deaths are often not specified," said lead author Christopher Ruhm, PhD, Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Ruhm and his colleagues developed a more refined database that supplemented the death certificate data with additional geographic information from states and counties. The supplemental data had a substantial influence on state mortality rankings.   

For example, the opioid and heroin death rates in Pennsylvania, based solely on death certificates, were 8.5 and 3.9 deaths per 100,000 people, respectively. The corrected data doubled the death rates in Pennsylvania to 17.8 for opioids and 8.1 and for heroin.

“Geographic disparities in drug poisoning deaths are substantial and a correct assessment of them is almost certainly a prerequisite for designing policies to address the fatal drug epidemic,” said Ruhm.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has also tried to refine the data from death certificates to make it more reliable.  A CDC study released last December used new software to scan the actual text of death certificates, including notes left by coroners. That study found that heroin, cocaine, fentanyl and anti-anxiety medication (benzodiazepines) were responsible for more overdose deaths in the United States than opioid pain medication.

A more reliable way to determine the cause of an overdose is through toxicology reports, which some states are now utilizing to better assess their drug problems. Pennsylvania recently found that fentanyl was involved in over half of its overdoses, followed by heroin, cocaine and anti-anxiety medications such as Xanax and Valium.  Opioid pain medication was ranked as the fifth most deadly drug. Toxicology reports have also determined that fentanyl is involved in over half the drug overdoses in Massachusetts.

Lessons About the Opioid Crisis from ‘Unbroken Brain’

By Roger Chriss, Columnist

The book “Unbroken Brain: A Revolutionary New Way of Understanding Addiction” by Maia Szalavitz offers invaluable insights about addiction. Her key point is that addiction should be seen as a learning disorder -- not a moral failing or brain disease.

Szalavitz says addiction treatment and drug policy should meet addicts where they are and deal with their reality, instead of using the moralistic or legalistic framework commonly seen in the opioid crisis.

Throughout the book, Szalavitz shares her own experiences with drug use in a way that does not mythologize addiction or recovery. Instead, her personal history highlights that there is no such thing as a typical addict and that addiction is not simply a moral failing or choice.

Szalavitz explains that addiction results from a complex combination of a person’s genetic makeup, early life experiences, and socio-cultural situation. Specifically, she states that: "There are three critical elements to it; the behavior has a psychological purpose; the specific learning pathways involved make it become nearly automatic and compulsive; and it doesn’t stop when it is no longer adaptive.”

She likens addiction to dysfunctional self-medication, an effort to self-soothe and regulate internal states that have gone horribly wrong. This means that addiction is not about a substance, but about a person.

“Drugs alone do not ‘hijack the brain.’ Instead, what matters is what people learn -- both before and after trying them,” Szalavitz writes. “Addiction is, first and foremost, a relationship between a person and a substance, not an inevitable pharmacological reaction.”

Further, she states that “by itself, nothing is addictive; drugs can only be addictive in the context of set, setting, dose, dosing pattern, and numerous other personal, biological, and cultural variables.”

And there are several major risk factors for addiction, including severe early childhood trauma or abuse, existing mental illness, and serious life challenges. Particular emphasis is given to a history of abuse.

“In fact, one third to one half of heroin injectors have experienced sexual abuse, with the usual abuse rates for women who inject roughly double those for men. And in 50% of these sexual abuse cases, the offense was not just a single incident but an ongoing series of attacks, typically conducted by a relative or family friend who should have been a source of support, not stress,” wrote Szalavitz.

She also states that addiction is not just about euphoria: “Research now suggests that there are at least two distinct varieties of pleasure, which are chemically and psychologically quite different in terms of those effects on motivation. These types were originally characterized by psychiatrist Donald Klein as the ‘pleasure of the hunt’ and the ‘pleasure of the feast’.”

This means that addiction is about far more than just dopamine levels: “If dopamine is what creates the sense of pleasure, animals shouldn’t be able to enjoy food without it. Yet they do.”

Lower Risk of Addiction to Opioid Medication

On the subject of opioid medication, Szalavitz notes that about one in seven people do not tolerate opioids well enough to take them repeatedly and therefore have essentially no risk of opioid use disorder. Because of this and the importance of “set and setting” to addiction, she explains, “medical use of drugs carries a far lower risk of addiction than recreational use does.”

Because addiction involves a person in a particular sociocultural situation, she writes that “People with decent jobs, strong relationships, and good mental health rarely give that all up for intoxicating drugs; instead, drugs are powerful primarily when the rest of your life is broken.”

Approaches to addiction treatment that don't recognize the above are unlikely to succeed. Detox regimens, short-term medication therapy, and abstinence-only programs like Alcoholics Anonymous are generally inadequate. For instance, Szalavitz found a 2006 Cochrane Review that summarized the data plainly: “No experimental studies unequivocally demonstrated the effectiveness of AA.”

Instead, Szalavitz emphasizes the value of harm reduction, a process whose aim is to "meet the addicts where they are" and support them unconditionally, even if this means clean needle exchanges and safe injection sites.

“Don’t focus on whether getting high is morally or socially acceptable; recognize that people always have and probably always will take drugs and this doesn’t make them irrational or subhuman,” she wrote.

But American policy toward illegal drugs and attitudes toward medications with psychotropic effects are grounded in a moralistic view. “More generally, in the West, unearned pleasure has been labeled as sinful—the opposite of valued,” Szalavitz writes, explaining why any medication that helps a person feel good, or just not feel as bad, is viewed negatively. This has led to all manner of misguided policy in the War on Drugs.

“One of the sad ironies of our current drug policy is that the same treatment providers who have been cheerleaders for the war on drugs and who advocate the ongoing criminalization of drug use also claim to want to destigmatize ‘the disease of addiction’,” she wrote.

“This approach is doomed to failure because “punishment cannot solve a problem defined by its resistance to punishment.” Moreover, it is cruelly counterproductive because “the uniquely moral nature of the way we treat addicts as both sick and criminal also reinforces stigma.” By contrast, understanding addiction as a learning disorder leads to harm reduction as the core of a more effective approach to treatment.

“Unbroken Brain” is not pedantic or moralistic. Indeed, Szalavitz says that part of the reason U.S. policy toward drug addiction has failed is that it is pedantic and moralistic. But she also says that people who now say that addiction is a "brain disease" are missing the point too. "Drug exposure alone doesn't cause addiction," she says in the conclusion of the book.

A person's situation and circumstances matter a lot in drug use and addiction. And treatment requires recognizing that even the most addicted person can still learn and make positive changes in their life when given the chance.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society.

Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Trump Opioid Commission Calls for National Emergency

By Pat Anson, Editor

A White House commission on combating drug addiction and the opioid crisis has recommended that President Trump declare a national emergency to speed up federal efforts to combat the overdose epidemic, which killed over 47,000 Americans in 2015.

“If this scourge has not found you or your family yet, without bold action by everyone, it soon will. You, Mr. President, are the only person who can bring this type of intensity to the emergency and we believe you have the will to do so and to do so immediately,” the commission wrote in an interim report to the president.

The 10-page report was delayed by over a month, which New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie attributed to over 8,000 public comments the commission received after its first meeting in June. Christie, who chairs the commission, said the panel wanted to carefully review each comment.

In addition to declaring a national emergency, the commission recommended a variety of ways to increase access to addiction treatment, mandate prescriber education about the risks and benefits of opioids, and prioritize ways to detect and stop the flow of illicit fentanyl into the country.

There were no specific recommendations aimed at reducing access to prescription opioids, although they could be added to the commission’s final report, which is due in October.

“We urge the NIH (National Institutes of Health) to begin to work immediately with the pharmaceutical industry in two areas: development of additional MAT (medication assisted treatment)... and the development of new, non-opioid pain relievers, based on research to clarify the biology of pain,” Christie said. “The nation needs more options that are not addictive.  And we need more treatment for those who are addicted.”

“I think we also have to be cognizant that the advent of new psychoactive substances such as fentanyl analogs and heroin is certainly replacing the death rate due to prescription opioids. That is going to continue until we have a handle on the supply side of the issue,” said commission member Bertha Madras, PhD, a professor of psychobiology at Harvard Medical School.

“If we do not stop the pipeline into substance use, into addiction, into problematic use, into the entire scenario of poly-substance use, we are really not going to get a good handle on this.”     

Other measures recommended by the commission:

• Grant waivers to states to eliminate barriers to mental health and addiction treatment
• Increase availability of naloxone as an emergency treatment for opioid overdoses
• Amend the Controlled Substance Act to require additional training in pain management for all prescribers
• Prioritize funding to Homeland Security, FBI and DEA to quickly develop fentanyl detection sensors
• Stop the flow of synthetic opioids through U.S. Postal Service
• Enhance the sharing of data between prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs)

No estimate was provided on the cost of any of these measures.

Gov. Christie also spoke about eliminating pain levels as a “satisfaction criteria” for healthcare providers being evaluated and reimbursed for federal programs like Medicare.

“We believe that this very well may have proven to be a driver for the incredible amount of prescribing of opioids in this country. In 2015, we prescribed enough opioids to keep every adult in America fully medicated for three weeks. It’s an outrage. And we want to see if this need for pain satisfaction levels, which is part of the criteria for reimbursement, is part of the driver for this problem,” Christie said.  

Last year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) caved into pressure from politicians and anti-opioid activists by dropping all questions related to pain in patient satisfaction surveys in hospitals.  CMS agreed to make the change even though there was no evidence that the surveys contributed to excess opioid prescribing

Do You Use Alcohol to Relieve Chronic Pain?

By Rochelle Odell, Columnist

I’m in a Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS/RSD) support group and one of our members recently asked if any members were turning to alcohol because their pain medication had been reduced or stopped.

It piqued my interest, so I began researching the topic. There aren’t many current studies or reports, but it’s a valid question since alcohol is much easier to obtain than pain medication.

Alcohol was among the earliest substances used to relieve physical pain and, of course, many people use it to cope with emotional pain.

According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, as many as 28% of people with chronic pain turn to alcohol to alleviate their suffering.

Another study from 2009 found that about 25% of patients self-medicated with alcohol for tooth pain, jaw pain or arthritis pain.

There is no documented increase in alcohol use by chronic pain patients at this time, although I would hope there are studies in process that further clarify the question and problems arising from it -- especially with opioid pain medication being reined in and so many patients left with nothing to relieve their pain.

There are many reasons why a person may self-medicate with alcohol.

“People have been using alcohol to help cope with chronic pain for many years. Many people also may use alcohol as a way to manage stress, and chronic pain often can be a significant stressor,” Jonas Bromberg, PsyD, wrote in PainAction.

“One theory about why alcohol may be used to manage chronic pain is because it affects the central nervous system in a way that may result in a mild amount of pain reduction. However, medical experts are quick to point out that alcohol has no direct pain-relieving value, even if the short-term affects provide some amount of temporary relief. In fact, using alcohol as a way to relieve pain can cause significant problems, especially in cases of excessive use, or when it is used with pain medication.”

Constant, unrelenting pain is definitely a stressor -- that's putting it mildly -- but I’ve never added alcohol to my pain medication regimen. I was always afraid of the possible deadly side effects, coupled with the fact my mother was an alcoholic who mixed her medication with it. That's a path I have chosen not to go down.

Bromberg also tells us that men may be more likely to use alcohol for pain relief than women, and people with higher income also tend to use alcohol more to treat their chronic pain.

Interestingly, the use of alcohol is usually not related to how intense a person’s pain is or how long they’ve had it. It was the regularity of pain symptoms – chronic pain -- that seemed most related to alcohol use, according to Bromberg.

Those who self-medicate with alcohol for physical or emotional pain often use it with a variety of substances, both legal and illegal.

Researchers at Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center reported last year in the Journal of General Internal Medicine that in a study of nearly 600 patients who screened positive for illicit drugs, nearly 90 percent had chronic pain. Over half of them used marijuana, cocaine or heroin, and about half reported heavy drinking.

“It was common for patients to attribute their substance use to treating symptoms of pain,” the researchers reported. “Among those with any recent heavy alcohol use, over one-third drank to treat their pain, compared to over three-quarters of those who met the criteria for current high-risk alcohol use.”

“Substance use” (not abuse) was defined as use of illegal drugs, misuse of prescription drugs, or high risk alcohol use. I had not heard of this term before, it’s usually called substance abuse.  Perhaps these researchers were onto something really important that needs further study, particularly with opioid medication under fire.

“While the association between chronic pain and drug addiction has been observed in prior studies, this study goes one step further to quantify how many of these patient are using these substances specifically to treat chronic pain," they added.

What this information shows is that if one is on pain medication, using alcohol or an illegal substance does not make one unique. It is certainly not safe, but it does occur. We are all struggling to find ways to cope with chronic pain, and if someone is denied one substance they are at high risk of turning to another.

Rochelle Odell lives in California. She’s lived for nearly 25 years with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS/RSD).

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

The Myth of the Opioid Addicted Chronic Pain Patient

By Roger Chriss, Columnist

Prescription opioid use for chronic pain does not usually lead to addiction or to the use of illicit opioids such as heroin. But media reports often say otherwise.

“Opioids can be so addictive that many people develop a desperate need for them even after the pain has subsided, or disappeared. So when they’re turned away by doctors and pharmacies, they look for a fix on the streets,” Fox News recently reported.

Public officials also confuse the issue.

“Most of our constituents with substance-use disorders began their path to addiction after forming dependencies to opioids prescribed as a result of an injury or other medical issue,’ Anne Arundel County Executive Steve Schuh wrote in a letter to Maryland doctors. ‘Their opioid dependence may have led to obtaining illegal street opioids like heroin, sometimes laced with fentanyl, after valid prescriptions ran out.’”

But this is not what usually happens.

“What the media has sometimes missed is that of those people who started with prescription opioids and then went on to use heroin, 75% never had a legal prescription for opioids. They were already stealing or buying the drugs illegally,” Judith Paice, PhD, RN, director of the Cancer Pain Program at Northwestern University told Medscape.

In other words, the reality of opioid therapy for chronic painful conditions is quite different from what media coverage and public officials claim.

In fact, the majority of chronic pain patients never even receive opioid medications. Recent estimates state that between 8 and 11 million chronic pain patients receive an opioid prescription at some point in a given year, with only some of them taking opioids for pain control on a daily basis.

Although that is a large number, it is dwarfed by the National Institutes of Health’s estimate that 25.3 million Americans live with daily chronic pain and nearly 40 million have severe pain. That  includes people in hospice and other end-of-life care, as well as people enduring cancer pain.

Moreover, many of the chronic pain patients who receive daily opioid therapy get there only after having failed many other treatment options, including non-opioid drugs and physical therapy. Opioids are rarely the first choice for treating persistent pain conditions, especially in the wake of opioid prescribing guidelines from the CDC, Department of Veterans Affairs, and some states.

Chronic pain patients are carefully screened, scrutinized, and monitored. They are subjected to risk assessment using the Opioid Risk Tool, required to take urine and saliva drug tests, told to show their prescription bottles and have their pills counted, and given pain contracts to sign. Their prescriptions are verified at pharmacies and tracked through prescription drug monitoring programs. Opioid misuse in any form is readily detected and is far from common.

Therefore, it is a myth that opioid addiction or other forms of opioid use disorder starts with a prescription. Instead, it almost always begins at a young age with the misuse of other drugs, such as tobacco, alcohol and marijuana. About 90% of drug addiction starts during adolescence.

And although most people who are addicted to heroin have previously used prescription opioids, the opposite is not true. Most people on opioid therapy do not become addicted to prescription opioids, and most of the people who do become addicted do not transition to heroin.

But the myth confuses and conflates chronic pain and opioid addiction. And this is having real-world consequences, both for people on opioid therapy for chronic pain and for people with opioid use disorder.

For people on opioid therapy, the problems include forced medication tapers or even termination of therapy. Pain management is an essential part of a variety of diseases and disorders, from the neuropathy of arachnoiditis and multiple sclerosis, to the visceral pain of interstitial cystitis and porphyria, to the musculoskeletal pain of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. The choice and dose of medication should be a clinical decision made between patient and physician, not a blanket determination made by a guideline, regulation or committee.

Further, chronic pain is fast becoming undertreated or even untreated, which can have major health consequences. Forcing people to live without good pain management only creates more medical problems. 

For people suffering from opioid use disorder, the addiction myth embodies the idea that it is just accidental chemistry. But as Maia Szalavitz explains in her book Unbroken Brain, addiction has three key components: “The behavior has a psychological purpose; the specific learning pathways involved make it become nearly automatic and compulsive; and it doesn’t stop when it is no longer adaptive.”

The perpetuation of this myth has resulted in people not getting effective care, because the focus is on the substance instead of the sufferer.

“If we don’t invest in people and we focus on drugs, we end up creating another polarizing conversation about substances and people will continue to fall through the cracks,” Dr. Joseph Lee of the Hazelden-Betty Ford Foundation told the Minnesota Post.

The myth of the opioid-addicted chronic pain patient needs to be banished before it causes more people to fall through the cracks.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society.

Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

6 Reasons Opioids Get More Attention Than Alcohol

By Janice Reynolds, Guest Columnist

Every day we hear how the “opioid crisis” is spiraling out of control.  Some even claim it is the worst health crisis to ever hit our country.  The response has largely been to restrict access to opioid pain medications and to sue the pharmaceutical companies that produce them.

But what is the real crisis? The elephant in the room that everyone conveniently ignores?

I believe opioids are being used to cover-up and distract from the real addiction crisis, which is alcohol abuse. 

Alcoholic beverages have been with us for thousands of years and are an important part of everyday life. Alcohol consumption has been increasing in the U.S. since the late 1990's and today about 57 percent of Americans drink alcohol at least once monthly, far more than consume opioids. Drinking to excess is usually frowned upon, but has long been treated as socially acceptable, even by the Puritans:

Drink is in itself a good creature of God, and to be received with thankfulness, but the abuse of drink is from Satan, the wine is from God, but the Drunkard is from the Devil.                                                                                                                                                        --  Increase Mather, Puritan clergyman in “Wo to Drunkards” (1673)

Alcohol is the fourth leading cause of preventable death in the in the United States. In 2015, over 30,000 Americans died directly from alcohol induced cases, such as alcohol poisoning and cirrhosis of the liver. 

There are another 88,000 deaths annually from alcohol related causes, including motor vehicle accidents, homicide, suicide, and incidents of poor judgement – such as going out in subzero weather and freezing to death, and infants dying after being left in hot cars by drunk fathers.

Many harms also occur that usually do not result in death, such as alcohol-related sexual assault or date rape, fetal alcohol syndrome, and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. The World Health Organization reports that alcohol contributes to more than 200 diseases and injury-related health conditions, including alcohol dependence, cirrhosis, cancers, and injuries.

So why is alcohol ignored and the so-called opioid epidemic is hyped? Here are six reasons:

1) Many people drink alcohol. They may only drink “socially” and need a glass of wine or beer to relax, enjoy a sporting event or socialize at a party. Alcoholic beverages are an integral part of mealtime for many people.   

We also have functional alcoholics who are secret addicts.  As a nurse for over 20 years, it was not uncommon for me to have a patient begin to go through withdrawal after 48 hours in the hospital. Usually they deny drinking alcohol or admit to one drink a night. There is also denial by the medical profession about the dangers posed by alcohol, such as addiction specialists who differentiate between heavy drinkers and alcoholics.

Research frequently ignores alcohol entirely. A recent study looked at health conditions linked to Alzheimer’s disease and mentioned obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes and depression. Alcohol was not even considered, even though it has been shown in valid studies to damage brain cells.

2) Alcohol is BIG business.  Profits are immense and generate tax revenue.  Profits for breweries, distilleries and related businesses far outstrip what pharmaceutical companies make from opioids.  We see these monies going not only to shareholders, but government, lobbyists and advertising.

No one complains about a full-page newspaper ad for a brand of vodka, but a commercial during the Super Bowl for medication to treat opioid induced constipation sparks outrage. And no one bats an eye when a story about Maine liquor stores dropping the price of hard liquor is on the same front page with another article on the opioid crisis.

When have you ever seen a stadium named after an opioid or even a pharmaceutical company? Yet we have Coors Field in Denver, Busch Stadium in Saint Louis, and Miller Park in Milwaukee.

3) Problems need scapegoats. In this case we have two scapegoats: people in pain and opioids.  

Prejudices against people in pain have long existed: “It’s all in your head” or “the pain can’t be that bad” are all too familiar. It could also be simple bigotry towards someone different or a lack of compassion. We used to call pain management “an art and a science,” now it is optional and politically driven medicine.

Opiophobia has a long history as well; fear of addiction, fear of respiratory depression, belief that opioids don’t work, and that people in pain are drug seekers. The “opioid epidemic” has opened the gateway for uncontrollable and irrational bigots.

Nearly all the interventions to curb drug overdoses have been directed at people in pain, who are not responsible for the illegal use of opioids. If all prescription opioids disappeared tomorrow, it would have nil effect on the opioid crisis. Addicts would just turn to heroin and illegal fentanyl (if they haven’t already). There are a boatload of ways to get high.

4) McCarthyism: In the 1950’s, Senator Joseph McCarthy went hunting for communists and many lives were ruined. Today, the term “McCarthyism” defines a campaign or practice that uses unfair and reckless allegations, as well as guilt by association. 

Politicians, the media and many doctors are afraid to say anything not endorsing the “opioid epidemic” or supporting people in pain, because it will be held against them.

5) Fear-mongering:  The spread of frightening and exaggerated rumors of an impending danger that purposely and needlessly arouses public fear.

We can see this in the psychological manipulation that uses scare tactics, exaggeration and repetition to influence public attitudes about opioids. This is exactly what Andrew Kolodny and Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP) are doing, along with formally reputable organizations such as the Food and Drug Administration and professional medical associations.

6) The alphabet soup: The CDC, DEA, and the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) have all played a part in distracting us from alcohol abuse.  Although it is a drug, alcohol is not usually covered by the DEA, but is handled by the ATF, which mainly concerns itself with alcohol licensing and collecting alcohol taxes.

The DEA has been totally helpless to stop the influx of illegal opioids like heroin and illicit fentanyl, as well as thediversion of prescription medications. Their survival mechanism is to go after the legitimate use of opioids for pain.  They have become a terrorist organization that is driving providers out of pain management.

In order to cover-up the heavy cost of alcohol abuse, we have seen hysteria driven by politicians and the media. This has resulted in difficulty getting opioids prescribed for pain, skewered facts to support the “opioid epidemic,” the CDC’s opioid guidelines, and what I call the passive genocide of people in pain.

There are many different means by which genocide can be achieved and not all have to be active (murder or deportation). For our usage, genocide means “the promotion and execution of policies by a state or its agents which result in the deaths (real and figuratively) of a substantial portion of a group.” 

Our genocide is passive because it relies on the harmful effects of pain, suicide, withdrawal of treatment, excessive use of over-the-counter pain relievers, malpractice, and the total dismissal of the human rights of people with pain; as well as lies and falsehoods being held as truths to promote this genocide.

This is not to say that alcohol should be made illegal. Prohibition did not work because most people wanted alcohol and it lead to a huge criminal enterprise. It is to say prescription opioids should not be treated differently than other medications or alcohol.  And people in pain should not be used to further an agenda based on fallacious, unethical and immoral sensationalism. 

Janice Reynolds is a retired nurse who specialized in pain management, oncology, and palliative care. She has lectured across the country at medical conferences on different aspects of pain and pain management, and is co-author of several articles in peer reviewed journals. 

Janice has lived with persistent post craniotomy pain since 2009.  She is active with The Pain Community and writes several blogs for them, including a regular one on cooking with pain. 

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Pain Patients Need to Stop Demonizing Addicts

By Crystal Lindell, Columnist

Ok. Wait. Before you read the headline and send me hate mail, I just want to remind you guys that I am a pain patient. Just like you. So take a breath and let me explain.

So yes, the pain patient community needs to stop demonizing “addicts.” I know. I know. They make a great enemy. I mean, if it wasn’t for all those opioid addicts out there, we’d all be able to get the medications we need. Am I right?

But just as pain is complicated, so is addiction and so are opioids.

I recently wrote a column about my first time getting a lidocaine infusion, and it included a throwaway line about how I was hoping the treatment will help me get off opioids because, “I don’t actually love being high all the time.”

Dang. People were not happy I said that.

Apparently, there is this idea out there that if you are taking opioids like hydrocodone for legitimate physical pain, then you don’t get high from the medications. And if you are getting a high from them, then you’re an addict. The end.

Unfortunately, that’s not exactly how opioids work. There is no magic pill (yet) that we can take that relieves physical pain without also impacting our brains.  

Part of the problem that people seem to have a very specific idea about what the word “high” means. There’s a common trop in pop culture that shows addicts in tattered clothes, lying in an alley with their eyes rolled back in their heads. But that is far from the full picture.

When I take a hydrocodone, even a very small dose of 2.5 mg, I get more relaxed, a little tired, and my reactions are delayed. That’s also a version of getting high. And pretty much everyone else on even a low dose of opioids is likely having the same reaction.

Personally, I have found that when the drugs don’t have that impact on you, it usually means your body is getting used to them, and it will be that much harder to quit taking them.

Look, I get it. The current mood of the country is that opioids are evil and must be stopped. And for people suffering from horrific chronic pain, losing what is often the only treatment that actually works is horrifying. It’s easy to just point to the people causing all the opioid hysteria (the addicts) and blame them. But it’s more complicated than that.

Because when a Ohio sheriff refuses to carry the opioid overdose medication Narcan, it doesn’t just hurt addicts. It hurts pain patients who may accidentally overdose too.

And when addicts start out taking these drugs because of physical pain, what right do we have to attack them? We started taking them for the exact same reason.

I know that many pain patients find great comfort in separating the idea of addiction and physical dependence, but I have to tell you something that I learned when I took myself off morphine — the two aren’t actually all that different.

When you are on 60 mg of opioids a day for years at a time like I was and then stop taking them, your body doesn’t care why you started in the first place. And even if you can get through the first week of hellish withdrawal with horrible flu symptoms, panic attacks, insomnia and diarrhea, your brain could still crave the drug for as long as two years. It got used to having opioids, and has to rewire itself to function without it.

Pain patients often take opioids hoping it will alleviate their symptoms and make them feel normal again. But guess what? Addicts take them for the same reason. At a certain point, they need the drugs just to feel normal because their brain doesn’t work right without them anymore.

And, while pain patients start taking opioids for physical pain, many addicts usually started taking them to relieve pain as well — it’s just that their pain is emotional. But anyone who has ever suffered through a truly tragic loss or heartbreak can tell you that emotional pain can be just as awful as any physical pain. We all just want to feel better.

What Can We Do?

I truly believe that the government should not be involved in our health care decisions and I’m against many of the new regulations that try to limit what doctors can prescribe. Whether or not you should take opioids is a decision that should be made solely between you and your doctor. And I know that the reason many people take opioids is because there are no other effective treatment options available.

However, pretending that pain patients somehow have a different response to these medications than anyone else is naïve. And the sooner we recognize how intense the drugs are, the sooner we can actually start looking at realistic ways to help pain patients as well as addicts.

So how can we move forward? Well, legalizing marijuana everywhere would be a good first step, but even that won’t help everyone. We also need more research into pain treatments that actually work as realistic alternatives to opioids. We also must approach addiction with the same compassion we usually reserve for physical health problems. Addiction is a mental health issue, and the key word there is health.

We need to take a hard look at how we treat addiction, and move into longer-term models that help people for years and include professional psychiatric help. Pretending someone can get over opioid withdrawal by solely going to Narcotic Anonymous meetings is like pretending someone can get over cancer by solely going to weekly support group meetings.

We also need to treat underlying mental health issues like the serious health problems they are, because when people get their clinical anxiety and depression treated correctly, they are less likely to try to self-medicate with drugs like opioids.

Perhaps the best thing pain patients can do is join the same team as the addicts we love to hate. Because if fewer people were abusing opioids, then maybe the government would stop trying to take them away from pain patients.

Crystal Lindell is a journalist who lives in Illinois. She loves Taco Bell, watching "Burn Notice" episodes on Netflix and Snicker's Bites. She has had intercostal neuralgia since February 2013.

Crystal writes about it on her blog, “The Only Certainty is Bad Grammar.”

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

New Opioid Painkiller Has Less Abuse Potential

By Pat Anson, Editor

A new opioid medication being developed by Nektar Therapeutics for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain has significantly less abuse potential than oxycodone -- even at high doses – according to the results of a new clinical study.

The investigational oral drug – known as NKTR-181 -- is the first analgesic opioid designed to reduce side effects such as euphoria, which can lead to abuse and addiction.

In a small study involving 54 recreational drug users, NKTR-181 had significantly less “drug liking” than oxycodone in the first hours of use. The dosage given to the study participants ranged from a maximum therapeutic dose of 400mg of NKTR-181 to a “supratherapeutic” dose that was 3 to 12 times higher than common doses of oxycodone.

"It is clear from our new study results that NKTR-181 is highly differentiated in this respect from oxycodone, which is a choice drug of abuse.  Further, and critically important in the context of this public health emergency, NKTR-181's less rewarding properties and strong analgesia are inherent to its novel molecular structure and independent of any abuse-deterrent formulation,” said Ivan Gergel, MD, Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer of Nektar. 

“Many patients do not receive adequate pain relief because they fear taking conventional opioids, including abuse-deterrent formulations, because of their potential for abuse and addiction.  We believe NKTR-181 is a transformational pain medicine that should significantly advance the treatment of chronic pain and could be a fundamental building block in the fight against prescription opioid abuse.”

nektar therapeutics

In March, NKTR-181 received “fast track” designation from the Food and Drug Administration -- a status that allows for an expedited review of the drug – after Nektar reported positive results from a Phase 3 study of over 600 patients with chronic back pain.  Pain scores dropped by an average of 65% in patients taking NKTR-181 twice daily.

The molecular structure of NKTR-181 is designed to have low permeability across the blood-brain barrier, which slows its rate of entry into the brain – thus reducing the “high” or euphoric effect. Many pain sufferers say they do not get high or experience euphoria from opioid medication, but drug makers and regulators are working to develop painkillers with less risk of abuse and addiction.  

"Getting very high, very fast, is a mark of conventional high-risk, abused opioids," said Jack Henningfield, PhD, vice president at Pinney Associates and adjunct professor at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. "NKTR-181 represents a meaningful advance in the treatment of pain as the first opioid analgesic with inherent brain-entry kinetics that avoids this addictive quality of traditional opioids. This prevents the rapid 'rush' that abusers seek during the critical period immediately after dosing. Importantly, these properties of NKTR-181 are inherent to its molecular structure and are not changed through tampering or route of administration." 

Because NKTR-181 produces less euphoria, Nektar believes it should be scheduled as a Class III or Class IV controlled substance, a less restrictive schedule than Class II medications, a category that includes oxycodone, hydrocodone and many other opioids.

Nektar is a research-based biopharmaceutical company that discovers and develops new drugs for which there is a high unmet medical need. It has a pipeline of new investigational drugs to treat cancer, auto-immune disease and chronic pain.

FDA Study Calls for More Aggressive Opioid Regulation

By Pat Anson, Editor

A new report commissioned by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is calling for a sustained and coordinated national campaign to combat the opioid crisis, including more aggressive regulation of opioids by the FDA and a “cultural change” in the prescribing of opioid medication,

The report by a special committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) focuses primarily on restricting the supply of prescription opioids, not illicit opioids such as heroin and fentanyl, which are now driving the so-called opioid epidemic.

"The broad reach of the epidemic has blurred the formerly distinct social boundary between prescribed opioids and illegally manufactured ones, such as heroin," said committee chair Richard Bonnie, a Professor of Medicine and Law at the University of Virginia.

“This report provides an action plan directed particularly at the health professions and government agencies responsible for regulating them. This plan aims to help the millions of people who suffer from chronic pain while reducing unnecessary opioid prescribing. We also wanted to convey a clear message about the magnitude of the challenge. This epidemic took nearly two decades to develop, and it will take years to unravel."

The report estimates that at least 2 million people in the U.S. have an “opioid use disorder” involving prescription opioids -- meaning they are addicted to prescription painkillers -- and almost 600,000 have an opioid use disorder involving heroin.

Although opioid prescribing has been declining and the number of overdose deaths from prescription opioids has remained relatively stable in recent years, deaths from illicit opioids such as heroin have tripled in the past decade.

NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES, ENGINEERING, AND MEDICINES

The report claimed that many people who normally would use prescription opioids have transitioned to heroin because of the declining price of heroin and the introduction of abuse-deterrent formulations that make opioid medication harder to snort or inject. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has said there is no evidence to support the theory that legitimate patients are transitioning to heroin.

"Evidence does not support the hypothesis that initiatives intended to reduce opioid prescribing increase illicit opioid-related overdose at a population level," Deborah Dowell, MD, of the CDC recently wrote in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

The NASEM committee recommended that further efforts be made to restrict the supply of opioid medication, even though there is “limited evidence” that steps taken so far are working and may, in fact, be harming patients.

“Although more research is needed, limited evidence suggests that state and local interventions aimed at reducing the supply of prescription opioids in the community may help curtail access. Importantly, however, none of these studies investigates the impact of reduced access on the well-being of individuals suffering from pain whose access to opioids was curtailed,” the report states.

The NASEM report also recommends broader insurance coverage of non-opioid treatments.and better education of physicians in pain management.

“The committee’s recommended changes to provider education and payer policy should be accompanied by a change in patient expectations with respect to the treatment and management of chronic pain. Attention is not being paid to educating the general public on the risks and benefits of opioid therapy, or the comparative effectiveness of opioids with nonopioid or nonpharmacologic therapies,” the committee said.

The committee also recommended that the FDA conduct a full review of currently approved opioids and that it consider “public health considerations” in all of its regulatory decisions. Such a policy would require the agency to not only consider the safety and efficacy of opioids for legitimate pain needs, but also their impact on addicts and the illicit drug market.

“I was encouraged to see that many of NASEM’s recommendations for the FDA are in areas where we’ve already made new commitments,” FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, said in a statement.  “Among these important new actions is our work to ensure drug approval and removal decisions are made within a benefit-risk framework that evaluates not only the outcomes of opioids when used as prescribed, but also the public health effects of the inappropriate use of these drugs.”

Last month the FDA asked that the opioid painkiller Opana ER be removed from the market, not because it was harming legitimate pain patients, but because addicts were abusing it and spreading infectious diseases through infected needles. It was the first time the agency has taken steps to remove an opioid from the market.

“These are just some of the important efforts we have underway. But to make a meaningful impact, this epidemic must be addressed as a public health emergency, and requires an all-of-the-above approach. As underscored in the NASEM report, the scope of this epidemic is so large, it’s going to require a coordinated effort that includes federal, state, and local partners,” Gottlieb said.

The NASEM study was funded by the FDA.

From Bad to Worse: The Future of the Opioid Crisis

By Roger Chriss, Columnist

The opioid crisis is getting worse. STAT News is predicting that “opioids could kill nearly half a million people across America over the next decade as the crisis of addiction and overdose accelerates.” The Guardian calls it “this generation’s AIDS crisis.”

There are three developments now at work that are likely to determine the future direction of the opioid crisis: Illicit drugs coming from China and Mexico; healthcare reform and funding for addiction treatment; and the White House Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis, chaired by New Jersey governor Chris Christie.  

With opioid prescriptions dropping since 2010, heroin and illicit fentanyl are now the main drivers of the opioid crisis. The U.S. is trying to get China to shut down illicit labs and stop the shipment of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids to Mexican drug cartels. But The Globe and Mail warns that “hoping Chinese police and border officials can solve the problem is unlikely to be an effective strategy.”

The New York Times reports illicit drugs can also be obtained online over the “dark web” and attempts to block overseas shipments of such drugs have met with little success so far.

In the U.S. Senate, the GOP healthcare bill would allocate $2 billion to addiction treatment, but CNN reports that “those on the front lines say the bill won't help the opioid crisis -- and very well could make matters worse.” The reason, says Politico, is that “throwing a pile of cash at addiction won’t make it go away.”

Presidential advisor Kellyanne Conway echoes that belief, warning that “money alone hasn’t solved the problem. Obamacare spent billions of dollars and where are we?”

“It takes money and it also takes a four letter word called will,” she told ABC News, a comment that infuriated addiction treatment supporters.

Two Republican senators want to boost funding for addiction treatment to $45 billion, but experts say even that amount of money would be inadequate because it doesn’t provide for the treatment of other healthcare problems – like HIV and hepatitis C – that many addicts have.

Addiction treatment was the focus of the first meeting of the White House Opioid Commission, which was appointed by President Trump to come up with solutions to the opioid crisis.  During last month’s meeting, Mitchell Rosenthal, MD, founder of the addiction treatment chain Phoenix House, warned that “nothing we are doing today has been able to halt the spread of opioid addiction. Controlling prescription opioid medication has not done so.”

The commission has until October 1 to present its recommendations to President Trump, but the panel has already missed one deadline for an interim report and postponed its second meeting until next week.

As you can see, there are no easy solutions. The opioid crisis is a perfect storm of increasingly available illicit drugs, very limited and costly treatment resources, and virtually no early detection or prevention. We can’t simply legislate, regulate or incarcerate our way out.

Nothing less than a comprehensive and coordinated national response will end the crisis. We need early intervention and preventative education, long-term treatment of opioid addiction using medication-assisted therapy, and careful and humane oversight of prescription opioids that doesn’t take them away from patients who need them. What we will get remains to be seen.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society.

Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Drug Maker to Stop Sales of Opana ER

By Pat Anson, Editor

Endo International has agreed to voluntarily remove Opana ER from the market, one month after the Food and Drug Administration said safety risks posed by the pain medication outweigh its benefits. Opana ER is the brand name for Endo’s extended release opioid painkiller oxymorphone.

“Endo International continues to believe in the safety, efficacy, and favorable benefit-risk profile of Opana ER when used as intended, and notes that the Company has taken significant steps over the years to combat misuse and abuse,” the company said in a statement.

“Endo reiterates that neither the FDA's withdrawal request nor Endo's decision to voluntarily remove Opana ER from the market reflect a finding that the product is not safe or effective when taken as prescribed.”

If Endo had not agreed to stop Opana sales, the FDA would have taken steps to require its removal by withdrawing approval for the drug. The company said it would work with the FDA to remove Opana “in a manner that looks to minimize treatment disruption for patients” and to give patients time to consult with doctors about other alternative painkillers.

The FDA action is the first time the agency has taken steps to stop an opioid painkiller from being sold. Opana was reformulated by Endo in 2012 to make it harder to abuse, but addicts quickly discovered they could still inject it. The FDA said Opana was linked to serious outbreaks of HIV, hepatitis C and a blood clotting disorder spread by infected needles.

Next week the FDA will meet with “external thought leaders” to review the effectiveness of other painkillers made with abuse deterrent formulas, which make medications harder for addicts to crush or liquefy for snorting and injecting.

FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, has hinted the agency could take other painkillers off the market.

“We will continue to take regulatory steps when we see situations where an opioid product’s risks outweigh its benefits, not only for its intended patient population but also in regard to its potential for misuse and abuse,” Gottlieb said last month.

“I’m hopeful that this signals a change at FDA—and that Opana might be just the first opioid that they’ll consider taking off the market. It’s too soon to tell,” Andrew Kolodny, MD, Executive Director of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP) told Mother Jones.

Endo said it will incur a pre-tax impairment charge of $20 million in the second quarter of 2017 to write-off the remaining book value of Opana.  Sales of Opana reached nearly $159 million in 2016.