Americans Are Using More Alternative Pain Therapies

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

It’s fair to say that almost every person living with chronic pain has been told by a doctor, loved one, friend or even strangers that they should try a “complimentary health approach” to pain management. Also known as a “multimodal” or “comprehensive” care, the idea is to get pain patients to reduce or stop using opioids and other medications by utilizing alternative health therapies such as massage, meditation and acupuncture.

A new study shows that there has been surge in the use of those therapies by Americans over the last two decades, with chronic pain sufferers leading the way.   

Researchers at the National Institutes of Health looked at data from the 2002, 2012, and 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to evaluate the use of seven alternative therapies: yoga, meditation, massage, chiropractic care, acupuncture, naturopathy, and guided imagery/progressive muscle relaxation.

Their findings, published in JAMA Network Open, show significant increases in the use of all seven therapies. The most widely used alternative therapy was meditation, which rose from 7.5% of respondents in 2002 to 17.3% in 2022.The largest increase in utilization was for yoga, which rose from 5% of respondents in 2002 to 15.8% in 2022.

Complimentary Health Approaches Used by U.S. Adults

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

By 2022, over a third of respondents (36.7%) reported using at least one complimentary health approach (CHA), up from 19.2% in 2002. Nearly half said they used a CHA for pain management.

The CHAs most widely used for pain in 2022 were chiropractic care (85.7%) and acupuncture (72.8%). Researchers think that expanded insurance coverage for those treatments may have contributed to their growing use. Significant reductions in opioid prescribing over the last decade may have also driven people to try other treatments.  

Complimentary Health Approaches Used for Pain

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH

“Between 2002 and 2022, US adults increasingly used CHAs, including for pain management. This shift in utilization coincides with increased pain prevalence nationally and may be attributable to several factors, including randomized clinical trials suggesting that some CHAs provide low to moderate levels of pain management, incorporation of CHAs into best practice pain management guidelines, and the need to mitigate unnecessary use of potentially harmful opioids through use of nonopioid interventions,” wrote lead author Richard Nahin, PhD, lead epidemiologist at the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health.

As with many of these data mining studies, the NIH researchers did not document what kind of pain conditions the respondents had, how often they used an alternative therapy, or even whether the treatment worked.  

According to one estimate, 55 million U.S. adults spent $28.3 billion on CHAs in 2012, about 9% of total out-of-pocket health care expenses that year.

Ketamine Therapy a ‘Wild West’ for Patients

By Dawn Megli, KFF Health News

In late 2022, Sarah Gutilla’s treatment-resistant depression had grown so severe, she was actively contemplating suicide. Raised in foster care, the 34-year-old’s childhood was marked by physical violence, sexual abuse, and drug use, leaving her with life-threatening mental scars.

Out of desperation, her husband scraped together $600 for the first of six rounds of intravenous ketamine therapy at Ketamine Clinics Los Angeles, which administers the generic anesthetic for off-label uses such as treating depression or chronic pain. When Gutilla got into an Uber for the 75-mile drive to Los Angeles, it was the first time she had left her home in Llano, California, in two years. The results, she said, were instant.

“The amount of relief I felt after the first treatment was what I think ‘normal’ is supposed to feel like,” she said. “I’ve never felt so OK, and so at peace.”

For-profit ketamine clinics have proliferated over the past few years, offering infusions for a wide array of mental health issues, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, and anxiety. Although the off-label use of ketamine hydrochloride, a Schedule III drug approved by the FDA as an anesthetic in 1970, was considered radical just a decade ago, now between 500 and 750 ketamine clinics have cropped up across the nation.

Market researcher Grand View Research pegged industry revenues at $3.1 billion in 2022, and projects them to more than double to $6.9 billion by 2030. Most insurance doesn’t cover ketamine for mental health, so patients must pay out-of-pocket.

While it’s legal for doctors to prescribe ketamine, the FDA hasn’t approved it for pain or mental health treatment, which means that individual practitioners must develop their own treatment protocols. The result is wide variability among providers, with some favoring gradual, low-dosage treatments while others advocate larger amounts that can induce hallucinations, as the drug is psychedelic at the right doses.

“Ketamine is the wild West,” said Dustin Robinson, the managing principal of Iter Investments, a venture capital firm specializing in hallucinogenic drug treatments.

Ketamine practitioners stress that the drug’s emergence as a mental health treatment is driven by a desperate need. Depression is the leading cause of disability in the United States for individuals ages 15-44, according to the National Institute of Mental Health, and around 25% of adults experience a diagnosable mental disorder in any given year.

Meanwhile, many insurance plans cover mental health services at lower rates than physical health care, despite laws requiring parity. Thus many patients with disorders receive little or no care early on and are desperate by the time they visit a ketamine clinic, said Steven Siegel, chair of psychiatry and the behavioral sciences at the University of Southern California’s Keck School of Medicine.

But the revelation that “Friends” star Matthew Perry died in part from a large dose of ketamine, along with billionaire Elon Musk’s open use of the drug, has piqued fresh scrutiny of ketamine and its regulatory environment, or lack thereof.

Commercial ketamine clinics often offer same-day appointments, in which patients can pay out-of-pocket for a drug that renders immediate results. The ketamine is administered intravenously, and patients are often given blankets, headphones, and an eye mask to heighten the dissociative feeling of not being in one’s body. A typical dose of ketamine to treat depression, which is 10 times lower than the dosage used in anesthesia, costs clinics about $1, but clinics charge $600-$1,000 per treatment.

Ketamine is still shadowed by its reputation as the party drug known as “Special K”; Siegel’s first grant from the National Institutes of Health was to study ketamine as a drug of abuse. It has the potential to send users down a “K hole,” otherwise known as a bad trip, and can induce psychosis. Research in animals and recreational users has shown chronic use of the drug impairs both short- and long-term cognition.

Perry’s death in October raised alarms when the initial toxicology screening attributed his death to the acute effects of ketamine. A December report revealed Perry received infusion therapy a week before his death but that the fatal blow was a high dose of the substance taken with an opioid and a sedative on the day of his death — indicating that medical ketamine was not to blame.

A Variety of Protocols

Sam Mandel co-founded Ketamine Clinics Los Angeles in 2014 with his father, Steven Mandel, an anesthesiologist with a background in clinical psychology, and Sam said the clinic has established its own protocol. That includes monitoring a patient’s vital signs during treatment and keeping psychiatrists and other mental health practitioners on standby to ensure safety. Initial treatment starts with a low dose and increases as needed.

While many clinics follow the Mandels’ graduated approach, the dosing protocol at MY Self Wellness, a ketamine clinic in Bonita Springs, Florida, is geared toward triggering a psychedelic episode.

Christina Thomas, president of MY Self Wellness, said she developed her clinic’s procedures against a list of “what not to do” based on the bad experiences people have reported at other clinics.

The field isn’t entirely unregulated: State medical and nursing boards oversee physicians and nurses, while the FDA and Drug Enforcement Administration regulate ketamine. But most anesthesiologists don’t have a background in mental health, while psychiatrists don’t know much about anesthesia, Sam Mandel noted. He said a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach is needed to develop standards across the field, particularly because ketamine can affect vital signs such as blood pressure and respiration.

The protocols governing Spravato, an FDA-approved medication based on a close chemical cousin of ketamine called esketamine, are illustrative. Because it has the potential for serious side effects, it falls under the FDA’s Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies program, which puts extra requirements in place, said Robinson. Spravato’s REMS requires two hours of monitoring after each dose and prohibits patients from driving on treatment days.

Generic ketamine, by contrast, has no REMS requirements. And because it is generic and cheap, drugmakers have little financial incentive to undertake the costly clinical trials that would be required for FDA approval.

That leaves it to the patient to assess ketamine providers. Clinics dedicated to intravenous infusions, rather than offering the treatment as an add-on, may be more familiar with the nuances of administering the drug. Ideally, practitioners should have mental health and anesthesia expertise, or have multiple specialties under one roof, and clinics should be equipped with hospital-grade monitoring equipment, Mandel said.

Siegel, who has researched ketamine since 2003, said the drug is especially useful as an emergency intervention, abating suicidal thoughts for long enough to give traditional treatments, like talk therapy and SSRI antidepressants, time to take effect. “The solutions that we have and have had up until now have failed us,” Mandel said.

The drug is now popular enough as a mental health treatment that the name of Mandel’s clinic is a daily sight for thousands of Angelenos as it appears on 26 Adopt-A-Highway signs along the 405 and 10 freeways.

And the psychedelic renaissance in mental health is accelerating. A drug containing MDMA, known as ecstasy or molly, is expected to receive FDA approval in 2024. A drug with psilocybin, the active ingredient in “magic mushrooms,” could launch as early as 2027, the same year a stroke medicine with the active ingredient of DMT, a hallucinogen, is expected to debut.

Robinson said many ketamine clinics have opened in anticipation of the expanded psychedelic market. Since these new drugs will likely be covered by insurance, Robinson advises clinics to offer FDA-approved treatments such as Spravato so they’ll have the proper insurance infrastructure and staff in place.

For now, Sarah Gutilla will pay out-of-pocket for ketamine treatments. One year after her first round of infusions, she and her husband are saving for her second. In the meantime, she spends her days on her ranch in Llano where she rescues dogs and horses, and relies on telehealth therapy and psychiatric medications.

While the infusions aren’t “a magic fix,” they are a tool to help her move in the right direction.

“There used to be no light at the end of the tunnel,” she said. “Ketamine literally saved my life.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Experimental Non-Opioid Drug Effective in Treating Acute Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

An experimental non-opioid analgesic was effective in treating post-operative pain in two Phase 3 clinical trials, setting the stage for a New Drug Application to the FDA by Vertex Pharmaceuticals later this year.

The drug – called VX-548 – was given orally to patients with moderate-to-severe pain in the first 48 hours after an abdominoplasty or bunionectomy, two minimally invasive surgeries. VX-548 was more effective in reducing pain than the placebo, but it was not more effective than a combination of the opioid hydrocodone and acetaminophen, more commonly known as Vicodin.

In a third Phase 3 study, VX-548 was effective for up to 14 days across a broad range of surgical and non-surgical acute pain conditions. Over 80% of patients in that study rated VX-548 as good, very good, or excellent in treating pain.

“We are very pleased with the results from the VX-548 pivotal program, which demonstrate a compelling and consistent combination of efficacy and safety across multiple acute pain conditions and settings. The VX-548 benefit-risk profile ideally positions it to potentially fill the gap between medicines with good tolerability but limited efficacy and opioid medicines with therapeutic efficacy but known risks, including addictive potential,” Reshma Kewalramani, MD, CEO and President of Vertex, said in a press release.

“With FDA Breakthrough and Fast Track Designations in hand, we are working with urgency to file the New Drug Application for VX-548 and bring this non-opioid medicine to the millions of patients who suffer from acute pain each year in the U.S.”

VX-548 was generally safe and well tolerated in all three Phase 3 studies. Most of the adverse events reported by patients were mild to moderate, such as nausea and constipation.

Unlike opioids, VX-548 blocks pain in the peripheral nervous system, rather than the brain. That means it won’t have euphoric effects or be addictive. If approved for use by the FDA, experts say it would give patients and providers a much-needed alternative to opioids.

“As a physician treating patients suffering from pain for many years, I know firsthand the critical need for new, efficacious and safe treatment options,” said Jessica Oswald, MD, a Vertex consultant and Associate Physician in Emergency Medicine and Pain Medicine at University of California San Diego.

“The Phase 3 safety and efficacy across the three studies are impressive and demonstrate VX-548’s potential to change the paradigm of pain management. I look forward to the potential of having a new class of acute pain medicine — the first in more than two decades — to use as an alternative to opioids to help the millions of people impacted by acute pain.”

The risk of a surgery patient misusing opioids or becoming addicted is actually quite low – less than one percent. One recent study even found that restricting the use of opioids during surgery leads to more post-operative pain.

Vertex hopes to have VX-548 approved for a wide variety of pain conditions, not just post-operative pain.  Last month, the company released positive results for the drug in reducing pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Vertex also recently won approval from the FDA for its CRISPR gene cell therapy for sickle cell disease, which potentially offers a cure for the painful blood disorder.

Rx Opioid Sales Rose at Publix as Other Pharmacies Cut Back

By Ian Hodgson and Christopher O’Donnell, Tampa Bay Times  

An executive at Teva Pharmaceuticals flagged Publix Super Markets in October 2015 after detecting what he called in an email “serious red flags” with the grocery chain’s orders of powerful opioids.

The share of high-strength oxycodone orders was well above normal for a chain of grocery store pharmacies, and the total number of pills sent to Publix stores was “significantly above their peers,” Teva’s head of federal compliance wrote in the email to his supervisors, according to court records in a federal lawsuit pending in Ohio against Publix and other companies.

“This is high-strength oxycodone ultimately going to Florida, a well-established hot spot for oxycodone abuse in the U.S.,” wrote the compliance officer, Joseph Tomkiewicz, in the email explaining why he halted Teva-manufactured prescription opioids to Florida’s Publix pharmacies.

The volume of prescription opioids dispensed in Florida fell 56% from 2011 to 2019 as the pharmaceutical industry was hit by lawsuits for its role in the national opioid crisis, according to a Tampa Bay Times analysis of Drug Enforcement Administration data recently released by a federal court. But while national pharmacy chains like CVS and Walgreens were dispensing fewer of the highly addictive drugs, Publix’s sales were soaring.

The Lakeland-based grocer’s sales of oxycodone climbed from 26 million pills per year in 2011 to 43.5 million in 2019, the data shows. The increase in sales, which far outpaced the chain’s addition of stores in Florida, saw its market share rise to 14%, enough to overtake CVS to become Florida's second-largest dispenser of all opioid medications, behind only Walgreens, which dispensed 28% of opioids in the state in 2019. The analysis excludes drugs like methadone prescribed for addiction treatment. Opioid sales at Publix dipped slightly in 2018 and 2019, the last two years of available data.

Even as its market share grew, however, Publix was not among the 15 national manufacturers, distributors, and pharmacies that Florida sued in 2018. That lawsuit claimed other pharmacies had flooded America with painkillers such as OxyContin, fueling debilitating addictions that strained communities’ first responders and medical providers.

The state’s lawsuit was a boon for Florida. While admitting to no wrongdoing, the companies agreed to settlement payments to the state, including $177 million from Teva, $440 million from CVS, and $620 million from Walgreens. The state didn’t sue Walmart but in 2022 negotiated a $215 million settlement from the retail giant, which also denied any wrongdoing.

However, there is no mention of Publix’s role on a state webpage touting the 10 opioid settlements reached during Ashley Moody’s tenure as attorney general.

That’s despite Publix being the third-biggest dispenser of opioids in the state, selling nearly twice the amount of the drugs as Walmart from 2006 to 2012, according to earlier DEA data made public in July 2019, more than two years before Florida prosecutors reached settlements with other pharmacy chains.

Moody, a Republican, took over as the state’s top legal official in January 2019. Her office declined to specifically address why Florida has not included Publix in any of its legal actions over opioids.

“We are proud of the more than $3 billion recovered through the historic opioid litigation, and since the filing of the amended complaint, the Department of Legal Affairs has and will continue to take action when merited by the evidence — as we did in the more recent actions with Walmart and McKinsey,” said Moody’s communications director, Kylie Mason, in an email.

The grocery chain made $10.6 million in political donations in Florida from 2016 to 2022 when the state was preparing and pursuing its litigation, state election data shows. Most of the donations were for Republican committees and candidates, including $125,000 donated to the Friends of Ashley Moody political action committee.

In Florida, Walgreens made $637,000 in political donations, including $8,000 to Moody, over the same period. CVS made $208,500 in donations, none of which went to Moody.

Other local communities in Florida and beyond did sue Publix. The federal suit naming Publix that prompted the release of the federal data was filed by Georgia's Cobb County. It has been earmarked as a test case for dozens of other lawsuits brought by cities and counties in the Southeast. Those include more than 20 Florida communities, among them St. Petersburg and Pinellas and Pasco counties.

While Walgreens and other national companies paid billions to settle their lawsuits and agreed to stricter drug controls, Publix is still contesting the cases.

Those communities claim that the grocery chain failed to operate an “effective suspicious ordering monitoring program” and that when Publix did limit orders to its own pharmacies, those pharmacies could bypass the check by going to a third-party distributor such as AmerisourceBergen.

Publix also should have known that its pharmacies in Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Tennessee, and South Carolina, were filling multiple prescriptions written for the same patient by the same doctor or by multiple doctors, the federal lawsuit alleges. As part of the national opioid settlement, other pharmacy chains were required to be more compliant with laws regulating opioids, including checks on suspicious orders and prescriptions from “blocked and potentially problematic” doctors.

“It’s a heck of a lot cheaper to distribute and dispense controlled substances without all these checks,” said Jayne Conroy, an attorney with New York law firm Simmons Hanly Conroy who is representing the Florida communities and has served as co-lead counsel in the national opioid litigation that has secured more than $50 billion in settlements and verdicts.

Publix did not respond to three emails and three phone calls to its communications office seeking comment. In its responses to the lawsuits, it has repeatedly denied allegations of wrongdoing.

In seeking to get the Ohio case dismissed, Publix attorneys argued that it can’t be considered “a public nuisance” to legally distribute and dispense opioids. The judge in the case denied the company’s motion and another legal brief that sought to prevent the release of the more recent DEA data.

In November 2022, Publix sued more than a dozen of its insurers in federal court in Tampa, claiming they had not honored policies that would protect it from opioid litigation claims.

It also countersued Cobb County in 2023, saying the Georgia community’s lawsuit was “motivated by promises of a windfall.” The case is still pending.

“Publix takes great pride in its relationship with its valued customers and the communities it serves,” that lawsuit states. “These novel and unprecedented claims are baseless, false, and belied by Publix’s decades of service.”

DEA officials declined to comment on Publix’s opioid record. No enforcement actions against Publix are listed in the federal registry.

A Growing Player

Since its 1930 start as a food store in Winter Haven, Florida, Publix has grown into a massive company with more than 250,000 employees and nearly 900 stores in Florida alone. Revered for its free cookies for kids, chicken tender subs, fresh produce, birthday cakes, and BOGO deals, the grocery chain has become one-stop shopping for customers.

And, increasingly, “Where Shopping Is a Pleasure” — Publix’s slogan since 1954 — includes powerful prescription drugs.

Publix was a smaller player in Florida’s opioid market before 2011, responsible for fewer than 5% of all opioid medications distributed to pharmacies across the state, according to the Times analysis of federal opioid data.

That year marked a turning point for opioid sales in Florida. As the scale of the opioid epidemic came to public attention, and litigation followed, most chain pharmacies began to back off their orders for pills, the data shows.

Many companies ultimately agreed to pay billions of dollars to settle lawsuits filed across the country by state and local governments. That included a $683 million settlement between Florida and Walgreens in May stating the pharmacy, which denied any wrongdoing, must pay for community treatment, education, and prevention programs, plus litigation costs.

In addition to hefty payouts, some settlement agreements required companies to adopt stricter controls to bring operations into fuller compliance with the Controlled Substances Act, a federal law that governs the manufacture, distribution, and use of drugs considered to have a high risk of being abused.

Distributors were required to adopt automated software that would flag suspicious orders from pharmacies such as quantities well above a store’s average. Pharmacy companies were required to conduct checks on doctors to ensure the prescribers are registered with the Drug Enforcement Administration. 

Those measures and others put the brakes on opioid distribution nationwide. Meanwhile, the distribution in Florida’s Publix stores went in the opposite direction: From 2011 to 2019, the grocery chain increased its dispensing of all opioid medication by 35%, according to the Times’ analysis of the data.

That growth far exceeded any increase in sales that would correspond to the grocer’s net addition of 146 pharmacies from 2011 to 2019.

As Publix’s distribution increased, so too did the number of orders that should have been flagged as suspicious, according to plaintiffs in multiple lawsuits. Drug distributor McKesson instructed its employees to investigate any pharmacy ordering more than 8,000 oxycodone pills in a single month as part of the company’s “Lifestyle Drug Monitoring Program,” according to 2018 congressional testimony.

Publix pharmacies’ orders surpassed that threshold almost 1,500 times in 2019, the Times analysis found, more than triple the number in 2011. The benchmark has been repeatedly used in opioid litigation as evidence of inadequate monitoring of drug distribution.

‘Red Flags’ Missed

As Tomkiewicz faced pressure from Teva management to fulfill Publix’s orders, he mined the data to back up his concerns, court records show. During a heated phone call, one Teva executive stressed that Publix was an increasingly important player in the opioid distribution market, Tomkiewicz said at his deposition, and an important client for the world’s largest generic drug manufacturer.

Tomkiewicz requested data from Publix’s 10 largest pharmacies by opioid sales, all located in Florida.

By law, Publix was required to keep tabs on the physicians whose prescriptions it filled. But it took Tomkiewicz just one day of searching the internet to find problems, according to time stamps on emails submitted in the court records.

Among the top prescribers at two Publix locations in Melbourne was Thomas Velleff, according to Tomkiewicz’s email. Public records and a newspaper report showed “significant anecdotal evidence of pill mill activity,” Tomkiewicz wrote. He said he found a 2010 article in the Treasure Coast Palm, in which a city employee claimed Velleff’s prior pain clinic in Palm City attracted “carloads” of patients, often with out-of-state license plates.

Complaints filed with the state Department of Health dating to 2010 allege that Velleff overprescribed opioids and failed to monitor his patients’ usage for signs of abuse. One 2017 complaint alleges that Velleff pressured one patient into loaning him money. The state Board of Medicine revoked Velleff’s medical license in December 2020. Velleff did not appear at his medical board hearing, according to the final order revoking his license. He did not respond to emails seeking comment.

A top prescriber at one Ocala store had been disciplined in 2011 for injecting herself with a sedative while leaving an anesthetized patient unsupervised. Other pharmacies repeatedly filled prescriptions from “cash-only” pain clinics or written by physicians located hundreds of miles away with no license to practice in Florida, Tomkiewicz wrote in the email. It is legal to do so, but drug diversion experts consider out-of-state prescriptions a red flag that should prompt additional checks for possible drug abuse.

Tomkiewicz had amassed a list of nine doctors among Publix’s top prescribers who made him wonder: “Why the hell do they still have a license and are still registered with the DEA?” according to his deposition.

Tomkiewicz also said in his deposition he was troubled by not just the volume of opioids Publix was selling, but that they were handing out a disproportionate share of 30-milligram instant-release oxycodone pills — another red flag for abuse. In an email to Teva’s director of compliance, he compared that with the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, where cancer patients were mostly being prescribed 5 mg instant-release pills, court records show.

As the strongest dose on the market, the 30 mg pills have limited use in retail pharmacies and are highly sought-after among abusers, Tomkiewicz wrote in the email. Stronger doses of oxycodone are available, but only in long-release capsules such as OxyContin, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Publix sold 4.8 million of the highly addictive high-dose pills in 2019 — roughly 1 in 10 of all oxycodone pills dispensed by the pharmacy chain that year, according to the Times analysis of the federal data.

Eventually, Tomkiewicz relented, he said in his deposition. As long as Publix promised not to send Teva products to nine locations that he’d picked out, he would let the shipment go ahead. Teva did not notify federal authorities, according to his deposition.

A Times review of court documents found no written record indicating that Publix responded to Tomkiewicz’s concerns at the time. An expert report submitted in the lawsuit came to the same conclusion.

This article was produced by the Tampa Bay Times and KFF Health News, a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Patients Should Know the Health Benefits of Ketamine, Not Just the Risks

By Drs. Amber Borucki and Rakhi Dayal 

Recent headlines about the death of “Friends” actor Matthew Perry have pointed to ketamine as a contributing cause. Perry drowned in his hot tub last October, which the medical examiner’s office attributed to the “acute effects of ketamine,” as well as coronary artery disease and the opioid buprenorphine.

With this news, the public became more familiar with a medication they may never have heard of previously.  Ketamine is a classified by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a “dissociative anesthetic,” meaning that it can cause the user to feel disconnected and alter their perceptions of sight or sound. 

Ketamine is used in hospital or surgical settings for anesthesia purposes, for acute pain management, in the emergency room or intensive care, and in some cases for chronic pain management. A form of ketamine (esketamine) is also used to treat mental health conditions. 

Appropriate monitoring and medical supervision are necessary for safe ketamine use. While it is important to recognize the risks of this medication when used improperly, it is also important to make sure that people don’t become overly fearful of a drug that serves an important role in patient care when delivered properly by trained healthcare providers. 

When the news broke that Michael Jackson’s death was attributed to propofol, patients were suddenly concerned about the use of this drug in their anesthesia treatment. As physicians, it is our responsibility to make sure patients understand the proper and improper uses of medications, and that we help alleviate concerns through education. As with any treatment, we need to strike the right balance between providing information on the risks, while also communicating the benefits. 

While ketamine is in the spotlight and more stories are published about its use, it is important that we take a moment to provide greater clarity about this medication.  

What Is Ketamine?  

Ketamine is an anesthetic agent that was originally developed in 1963 and gained approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a general anesthetic in 1970. It is well established that ketamine has tremendous clinical value in providing sedation and pain relief when patients undergo anesthesia, and can also be beneficial as part of a comprehensive pain management plan. More recently, the FDA approved a form of ketamine in a nasal spray for treatment-resistant depression.   

Ketamine is used for a variety of indications, with some being FDA-approved and some being considered "off-label" uses.  

• General anesthesia (FDA-approved): Ketamine can be used as part of a general anesthetic given for surgery, and in certain clinical situations is one of the preferred medications.  When ketamine is given by a trained anesthesia provider, it is a safe and effective part of the anesthesia regimen.     

• Acute pain (off-label): Ketamine can be given to treat pain after surgery or for other significant acute pain conditions. This is commonly done by providing a low-dose infusion of ketamine through an IV while a patient recovers in the hospital. Although this is considered "off-label” use, there are joint guidelines issued in 2018 by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) to guide safe use for acute pain.

• Chronic pain management (off-label): Ketamine for chronic pain is also considered "off-label" use, but there are also consensus guidelines by the ASRA, ASA and AAPM that discuss chronic pain clinical scenarios where research found ketamine to be beneficial. 

If a patient is considering the use of ketamine for chronic pain, it is important to understand what type of medical supervision is provided and by whom. Patients should consider seeking treatment from a physician who is board certified in pain medicine, as they have extra training in pain management. The use of ketamine for chronic pain should be part of a larger umbrella of comprehensive pain treatment strategies provided in a multidisciplinary care team model.

What Are the Risks of Ketamine?

Ketamine is classified a schedule III controlled substance by the DEA, and therefore has some addictive potential. Side effects include increased heart rate, high blood pressure, increased saliva production, blurry vision, dizziness, sedation, nausea, urinary symptoms, dissociation (out of body sensation) and respiratory depression. It can even cause hallucination at certain doses. 

Caution is advised when ketamine is used with other medications that have similar adverse effects, such as sedation, respiratory depression, confusion, and delirium. Medication interactions and overdose with ketamine can lead to unconsciousness, slowed breathing, and rare severe consequences such as death. 

The medical use of ketamine in general anesthesia under the medical supervision of a trained provider is generally considered safe. Off-label use of ketamine for acute and chronic pain also has established national guidelines for medical practitioners to follow. This treatment can provide pain relief to patients safely, when provided by a board-certified anesthesiologist or pain physician using proper monitoring and safety guidelines.

Unsupervised and non-medical use of ketamine, particularly when taken in combination with other sedating medications, can lead to adverse outcomes and even death, as we saw with Matthew Perry. We encourage patients to have conversations with providers about their treatment plan and to discuss any concerns they have about the medications they are prescribed.

Amber Borucki, MD, is an Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine at Stanford University.

Rakhi Dayal, MD is Chair of the Pain Committee for the California Society of Anesthesiologists, and Program Director of Pain Medicine and Professor of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Care at University of California, Irvine.

Walgreens and CVS Rated ‘Most Difficult’ for Opioid Prescriptions

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

When Walgreens and CVS signed the National Opioid Settlements in late 2022, they agreed to pay over $10 billion to states, cities and counties that sued them for their alleged roles in causing the opioid epidemic.

The nation’s two biggest pharmacy chains also agreed to watch for suspicious orders, report any “problematic” prescribers, and to strictly limit the amount opioid pain medication they can dispense in any given month. Opioids, in effect, were going to be rationed to their customers.

Pain patients are now paying a price for that agreement.

In a large survey of nearly 3,000 pain patients by PNN, over 90% of those with an opioid prescription said they experienced delays or problems last year getting their medication. Most patients went to another pharmacy, but nearly 20% still couldn’t to get their prescriptions filled – largely because opioids such as hydrocodone and oxycodone are in short supply.

The average patient had problems at a pharmacy at least three times in 2023. Some had trouble each time they went in for a monthly refill.

“I spent eight days trying to get my last prescription pills and finally got it filled two days ago, but I had to settle for only one third of my prescription,” said a patient who went through withdrawal for 8 days waiting for her medication.

“It's an unreal concept that I can have the piece of paper, I can have the doctor, I can have the pharmacy, I can have the money, and I can have the insurance, but I can't go and have the little medicine that I need to try to make it through this situation.” 

HOW MANY TIMES DID YOU HAVE A PROBLEM OR DELAY FILLING AN OPIOID PRESCRIPTION IN LAST 12 MONTHS?

‘There Is Always an Issue’

Asked which pharmacy chain was the most difficult to get an opioid prescription filled, over half the patients in our survey selected either Walgreens (30%) or CVS (26%).

“I've used Walgreens for all of my medications for the past 15 years and within the past year or so I have started having issues almost every month with them filling my pain medication,” a patient told us. 

“My local CVS says that they cannot get hydrocodone-acetaminophen at all. Yet, my local Giant Food supermarket can. Very strange,” said another. 

“I used Walgreens for many years. Recently they have had several new pharmacists. One pharmacist would not fill ANY controlled substances. The current pharmacist will only order about 3 to 4 times per month. She doesn’t care if patients don’t get their medications,” another patient wrote. 

“CVS continually gives me a hard time to fill my Rx even though I have been on it for over 7 years. It is either out of stock, or they argue with me about filling it,” said another. 

“Every month when I have to get my medication renewed there is always an issue,” explained another patient. “Walgreens always give people a hard time. I've seen many people standing in line and just walk out.” 

Patients also had trouble getting their prescriptions filled at Walmart, Kroger, Rite-Aid, Publix and small independent pharmacies, but they had far fewer complaints. CVS and Walgreens have about four times as many pharmacy stores as Rite-Aid, which may explain why they were singled out more often than the other chains.  

AT WHAT PHARMACY DID YOU EXPERIENCE THE MOST DIFFICULTY GETTING AN OPIOID PRESCRIPTION FILLED?

When told about the findings from PNN’s survey, CVS declined to comment and Walgreens provided a brief statement saying it “follows all applicable federal and state laws and regulations related to the dispensing of controlled substances.” 

More Cautious Dispensing

Even before signing the opioid settlements, Walgreens and CVS were among the first pharmacy chains to look at ways to minimize their dispensing of opioid medication.  

In 2017, CVS said it would limit the dose and supply of opioids to patients enrolled in commercial, employer or Medicaid health plans. The policy was adopted after CVS was fined hundreds of millions of dollars for violations of the Controlled Substances Act, many of those violations involving opioids. 

In 2013, Walgreens adopted a “secret checklist” that required its pharmacists to look for red flags, such as patients paying for opioids in cash, seeking an early refill, or taking a high number of pills. If anything was suspicious, pharmacists were told to “inform the patient that it may take additional time to process the prescription.”  Like CVS, the policy was implemented after Walgreens was fined millions of dollars by the DEA for violating rules for dispensing controlled substances. 

Walmart and Kroger also signed the National Opioid Settlements, while Rite-Aid filed for bankruptcy, in part due to the expense of defending itself in court. Thousands of pharmacies around the country are being closed due to over-expansion, poor business decisions, and the rising cost of lawsuits. 

Patients have noticed that the fines and lawsuits have made pharmacists more cautious. In our survey, dozens of patients said a pharmacist told them they would not fill their opioid prescription because they might get in trouble or lose their job. Many patients don’t know it, but pharmacists have a “corresponding responsibility” to exercise their professional judgement by not filling a prescription they think is inappropriate.

“Pharmacies and pharmacists have become an arm of law enforcement,” one patient wrote. “Pain medication prescriptions are treated as suspicious, with the pharmacist often questioning the appropriateness of my current MME (morphine milligram equivalent) levels while I’m undergoing a rapidly forced taper,” one patient wrote. 

“I have been hung up on just for calling (CVS) and asking if they would put my prescription in the queue for filling the next day. Call disconnected by pharmacist,” another patient said. “I emailed a written complaint to CVS and never heard back.” 

“The new manager in pharmacy at Walgreens, which is where I have gotten my pain medicine for 20 years, feels that I receive too much even though he has no idea of my diagnosis. He makes me feel like I am a low-class drug addict,” a patient told us. “I get much less than so many people I know, so I finally had to switch to mail order with OptumRx.” 

‘Independent Pharmacies Are Better’ 

Many patients have found that it’s easier to get a prescription filled at smaller pharmacy chains or at independent pharmacies that were not caught up in opioid litigation.  

“Independent pharmacies are better. I used to fill my opioid scripts at Walgreens. The pharmacist there always gave me a difficult time. He would refuse to fill unless he received a confirmation note from my pain specialist that I was taking the appropriate dose. I finally left him for an independent pharmacy,” one patient told us. 

“I'm fortunate to have a compassionate, independent pharmacy that bends over backwards to ensure I have the meds my doctor prescribes. If I was stuck with a chain pharmacy like Walgreens or CVS, my experience would be completely different. Those pharmacies treat pain patients like criminals,” wrote another. 

“I have used a small mom and pop pharmacy for over five years with no problems. Their only requirement is I get all my prescriptions filled at their pharmacy, not just the opioid or muscle relaxant,” said another patient. “Prior to changing, I had used CVS and Walgreens pharmacies, with both offering nothing but problems and harassment when taking my scripts in.” 

“Thankfully, I live in a very small town and have had a great experience with my pharmacy so far. Small mom and pop set up. So far, only handful of times had them short me pills when they were unable to obtain the meds. Only had to wait a day or two for them to fill the rest,” wrote another patient.

‘My Pharmacist Is Awesome’

While often frustrated by the ordeal of getting their prescriptions filled, many patients appreciate how they are treated by pharmacists. Asked what their overall experience has been with pharmacists, respondents were evenly divided. Nearly a third said their experience with pharmacists was “very positive” or “positive” – about the same number who said their experience was “negative” or “very negative.”      

“My pharmacist is pretty awesome and always has the opioid medications in stock,” one patient said. 

“Generally, my treatment at pharmacies has been first rate. Not so much the doctors,” said another. 

“My pharmacist is excellent and knowledgeable,” another patient wrote. 

“I made friends with my pharmacist because he knows I have several chronic pain syndromes,” another patient told us. “When I first met him, he didn't want to fill me, but now he helps me get my meds filled.” 

“In my experience, it’s pharmacist specific. Some are compassionate, others think everyone is an addict,” another patient said.

OVERALL, WHAT HAS BEEN YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH PHARMACISTS AS A PAIN PATIENT?

PNN’s online survey was conducted from November 13 to December 31, 2023. A total of 2,961 U.S. pain patients or caregivers participated.

White House Pharmacy Violated DEA Policy

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A pharmacy operated by the White House Medical Unit dispensed hundreds of prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances without keeping proper records, according to a scathing audit released this month by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) at the Department of Defense.

In many cases, drugs, surgeries and other medical services were provided to ineligible White House staff members at no cost. Over-the-counter medications were also free to be taken from open bins to anyone who wanted them.

The OIG launched an audit of the medical unit in 2018, after receiving complaints that an unnamed senior military medical officer assigned to the White House was acting improperly. Additional complaints received over a hotline questioned procedures at the pharmacy and the eligibility of patients that were being treated.

The resulting audit – which covered the years 2009 to 2020 – found “severe and systematic” problems at the White House pharmacy due to poor oversight that may have resulted in “prescribing errors and inadequate medication management.”

“In our analysis of the White House Medical Unit’s controlled substance records, we found that medications, such as opioids and sleep medications, were not properly accounted for, in violation of (federal law),” the OIG said. “White House Medical Unit medical providers wrote prescriptions for controlled substances that often lacked the medical provider and patient information mandated by DEA policy.”

DEA regulations require that prescriptions for all controlled substances contain the patient’s full name and address, as well as the name, address, and DEA registration number of the prescriber. But when reviewing 11 examples of prescriptions for controlled substances provided by the medical unit, investigators found much of that information was missing.       

The OIG was only able to obtain pharmaceutical records from 2017 to 2019, because the pharmacy kept records for just two years. Investigators found that the pharmacy still used handwritten ledgers to track the inventory of controlled substances. The ledgers frequently contained errors, illegible text, or text was that was crossed out.

A pharmacy ledger from 2019, seen below, shows that prescriptions were dispensed for the opioids morphine, hydrocodone, fentanyl and tramadol, as well as ketamine and diazepam – all controlled substances. Some medications were dispensed in unusually large quantities, such as 2,000 tablets of the sleep aid Ambien.

Names of the prescribers and patients on the ledger were redacted. In some cases, the ledger shows no record of who picked up the medications or if anyone signed a receipt for them.     

WHITE HOUSE MEDICAL UNIT CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE TRACKING FORM

In interviews with 70 former military service members who worked at the White House between 2009 and 2018, the OIG found there was a culture of entitlement. Administration officials and staff members who sought medical treatment were “not normal patients,” as one medical unit member put it.

“We bent knees and we bent the rules to meet this very weird, strange culture that was there, and I think it was really to just impress people,” the service member said. “And so I understand it’s almost like the culture of D.C. and politics, and somehow the Medical Unit got sucked up into that culture as well.”

Another service member highlighted inconsistencies in the medical unit’s practices.

“[There] were several concerns about we’re not accomplishing the mission the right way. Is stuff getting done? Yeah. Is it being done appropriately or legally all the time? No. But, are they going to get to that end result that the bosses want? Yeah.”

Other service members said the medical unit used alias accounts to provide free specialty care and surgery to ineligible White House staff. The alias accounts did not use the patient’s real name or address. When a medical unit staff member expressed alarm about that practice, they were instructed to provide care to the ineligible individual.

“Several former White House Medical Unit staff members stated that they felt unable to act outside of the will of the Physician to the President or the White House Medical Unit Director. One former White House Medical Unit medical provider stated that White House Medical Unit staff members were fearful of ‘making independent decisions’ without the approval of the Physician to the President or the Director of the White House Medical Unit,” the report said.

Dr. Ronny Jackson

The OIG report takes pains not to identify anyone by name or associate them with either the Obama or Trump administrations. But for many of the years covered by the audit, Dr. Ronny Jackson played key roles in the White House medical unit.

A U.S. Navy officer, Jackson joined the medical unit in 2006, and became its director in 2010. In 2013, Jackson was given the additional title of Physician to the President under Obama. In December 2014, Jackson ceased being Director of the White House Medical Unit, but remained as personal physician to Obama and then Trump until 2018. President Trump appointed Jackson as Chief Medical Advisor and Assistant to the President in January 2019.

In an email to PNN, a spokesperson for Jackson said that he only had a policy role in the medical unit after 2014, and had no association or involvement with the unit’s delivery of care.

In 2018, allegations of drunkenness, misconduct and mismanagement arose about Jackson’s service. Jackson called the allegations a “political hit job.” In December 2019, he retired from the Navy as a Rear Admiral, left the White House, and was elected a Republican congressman in Texas, a position Jackson still holds.   

In 2021, a seperate OIG investigation of Jackson found that he disparaged and bullied subordinates, created a hostile work environment, and engaged in “inappropriate conduct” involving his use of alcohol. Jackson was also found to have used Ambien to help him sleep on long overseas flights on Air Force One, “raising concerns about his potential incapacity to provide proper medical care during this travel.”  

(3/7/24 Update: The Washington Post reported that Jackson was demoted to the rank of captain in 2022 after the OIG report on his conduct. The demotion had not previously been reported and has not been acknowledged by Jackson.)

Gabapentinoids Still Overprescribed Despite Warnings

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Despite warnings that they are overprescribed for conditions they were never intended to treat, the use of gabapentinoids continues to grow in the United States.

Pregabalin (Lyrica) and gabapentin (Neurontin) are both gabapentinoids, a class of nerve medication initially developed to treat epileptic seizures. Sales of Lyrica and Neurontin tripled a decade ago, when they were touted as safer alternatives to opioids and prescribed off-label for a variety of pain conditions.

In 2018, Michael Johansen, MD, a researcher and family medicine physician, was one of the first to warn that gabapentinoids were being overprescribed, despite little of evidence of their safety and efficacy for pain conditions. Johansen was particularly concerned the drugs were being given to older adults who were long-time users of opioids and benzodiazepines, a class of anti-anxiety medication.

Not much has changed, according to a new research study by Johansen. Using data from a large national survey, Johansen found that 4.7% of U.S. adults were prescribed a gabapentinoid in 2021, up from 4% in 2015 – a statistically significant increase of 17.5% in six years. The growth was primarily driven by gabapentin, as there was little change in pregabalin’s use.

As Johansen found in his earlier study, gabapetinoid use was much more likely in patients who were co-prescribed opioids, muscle relaxants, benzodiazepines or anti-depressants for chronic pain or mental health conditions. The likelihood of a patient being prescribed a gabapentinoid also rises sharply after age 50.

“Gabapentinoids continue to be commonly used in conjunction with other sedating medications, which is concerning in light of the US Food and Drug Administration’s 2019 warning about co-prescribing of gabapentinoids with other central nervous system depressants,” Johansen reported in the Annals of Family Medicine. “Gabapentinoids are likely used for an array of conditions, with the majority being off-label uses for chronic pain with minimal evidence supporting use.”

Despite those warnings, gabapentinoids — gabapentin in particular — are still being promoted as a treatment for all sorts of things, from dental pain to alcoholism to improving your sex life. Gabapentin has been pitched for so many different conditions that a drug company executive infamously called it “snake oil.”

Gabapentin is FDA-approved for epilepsy and neuropathic pain caused by shingles, but is often prescribed off-label for depression, ADHD, migraine, fibromyalgia, bipolar disorder and postoperative pain.  Pregabalin is approved for diabetic nerve pain, fibromyalgia, post-herpetic neuralgia caused by shingles and spinal cord injuries, but is also prescribed off-label for other types of pain.

Many patients report side-effects from gabapentinoids, such as weight gain, blurred vision, dizziness, sedation and cognitive issues. There are also an increasing number of reports that the drugs are being abused and sold on the street to boost the potency of illicit drugs.

“Reports of gabapentinoid abuse alone, and with opioids, have emerged and there are serious consequences of this co-use, including respiratory depression and increased risk of opioid overdose death,” Douglas Throckmorton, MD, a top FDA official said when the agency released  its 2019 warning.  

A 2019 study found little evidence that gabapentinoids should be used off-label to treat pain and said their effectiveness was often exaggerated by prescribing guidelines. The CDC’s 2016 opioid guideline recommended gabapentin and pregabalin dozens of times as alternatives to opioids, without saying a word about their abuse or side effects.

The CDC’s 2022 revised opioid guideline takes a more cautious approach, saying gabapentin and pregabalin can have “small to moderate improvements” on pain, but were associated with a moderate risk of adverse events. Evidence on their long-term use was also lacking, according to the CDC.  

U.S. Healthcare System Isn’t Ready for Surge of Disabled Seniors

By Judith Graham, KFF Health News

The number of older adults with disabilities — difficulty with walking, seeing, hearing, memory, cognition, or performing daily tasks such as bathing or using the bathroom — will soar in the decades ahead, as baby boomers enter their 70s, 80s, and 90s.

But the health care system isn’t ready to address their needs.

That became painfully obvious during the covid-19 pandemic, when older adults with disabilities had trouble getting treatments and hundreds of thousands died. Now, the Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institutes of Health are targeting some failures that led to those problems.

One initiative strengthens access to medical treatments, equipment, and web-based programs for people with disabilities. The other recognizes that people with disabilities, including older adults, are a separate population with special health concerns that need more research and attention.

Lisa Iezzoni, 69, a professor at Harvard Medical School who has lived with multiple sclerosis since her early 20s and is widely considered the godmother of research on disability, called the developments “an important attempt to make health care more equitable for people with disabilities.”

“For too long, medical providers have failed to address change in society, changes in technology, and changes in the kind of assistance that people need,” she said.

Among Iezzoni’s notable findings published in recent years:

Most doctors are biased: In survey results published in 2021, 82% of physicians admitted they believed people with significant disabilities have a worse quality of life than those without impairments. Only 57% said they welcomed disabled patients.

“It’s shocking that so many physicians say they don’t want to care for these patients,” said Eric Campbell, a co-author of the study and professor of medicine at the University of Colorado.

While the findings apply to disabled people of all ages, a larger proportion of older adults live with disabilities than younger age groups. About one-third of people 65 and older — nearly 19 million seniors — have a disability, according to the Institute on Disability at the University of New Hampshire.

Doctors don’t understand their responsibilities: In 2022, Iezzoni, Campbell, and colleagues reported that 36% of physicians had little to no knowledge of their responsibilities under the 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act, indicating a concerning lack of training. The ADA requires medical practices to provide equal access to people with disabilities and accommodate disability-related needs.

Among the practical consequences: Few clinics have height-adjustable tables or mechanical lifts that enable people who are frail or use wheelchairs to receive thorough medical examinations. Only a small number have scales to weigh patients in wheelchairs. And most diagnostic imaging equipment can’t be used by people with serious mobility limitations.

Iezzoni has experienced these issues directly. She relies on a wheelchair and can’t transfer to a fixed-height exam table. She told me she hasn’t been weighed in years.

Among the medical consequences: People with disabilities receive less preventive care and suffer from poorer health than other people, as well as more coexisting medical conditions. Physicians too often rely on incomplete information in making recommendations. There are more barriers to treatment and patients are less satisfied with the care they do get.

Discrimination in Healthcare

Egregiously, during the pandemic, when crisis standards of care were developed, people with disabilities and older adults were deemed low priorities. These standards were meant to ration care, when necessary, given shortages of respirators and other potentially lifesaving interventions.

There’s no starker example of the deleterious confluence of bias against seniors and people with disabilities. Unfortunately, older adults with disabilities routinely encounter these twinned types of discrimination when seeking medical care.

Such discrimination would be explicitly banned under a rule proposed by HHS in September. For the first time in 50 years, it would update Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, a landmark statute that helped establish civil rights for people with disabilities.

The new rule sets specific, enforceable standards for accessible equipment, including exam tables, scales, and diagnostic equipment. And it requires that electronic medical records, medical apps, and websites be made usable for people with various impairments and prohibits treatment policies based on stereotypes about people with disabilities, such as covid-era crisis standards of care.

“This will make a really big difference to disabled people of all ages, especially older adults,” said Alison Barkoff, who heads the HHS Administration for Community Living. She expects the rule to be finalized this year, with provisions related to medical equipment going into effect in 2026. Medical providers will bear extra costs associated with compliance.

Also in September, NIH designated people with disabilities as a population with health disparities that deserves further attention. This makes a new funding stream available and “should spur data collection that allows us to look with greater precision at the barriers and structural issues that have held people with disabilities back,” said Bonnielin Swenor, director of the Johns Hopkins University Disability Health Research Center.

One important barrier for older adults: Unlike younger adults with disabilities, many seniors with impairments don’t identify themselves as disabled.

“Before my mom died in October 2019, she became blind from macular degeneration and deaf from hereditary hearing loss. But she would never say she was disabled,” Iezzoni said.

Similarly, older adults who can’t walk after a stroke or because of severe osteoarthritis generally think of themselves as having a medical condition, not a disability.

Meanwhile, seniors haven’t been well integrated into the disability rights movement, which has been led by young and middle-aged adults. They typically don’t join disability-oriented communities that offer support from people with similar experiences. And they don’t ask for accommodations they might be entitled to under the ADA or the 1973 Rehabilitation Act.

Many seniors don’t even realize they have rights under these laws, Swenor said. “We need to think more inclusively about people with disabilities and ensure that older adults are fully included at this really important moment of change.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Study Finds Low-Dose Naltrexone Works No Better than Placebo

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

In recent years, low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has grown in popularity as a treatment for fibromyalgia and other chronic pain conditions. Although naltrexone is only FDA-approved for the treatment of substance use disorders, a growing number of patients and providers say low doses of naltrexone prescribed off-label can be effective in relieving pain.

A new study by Danish researchers is casting doubt on the some of those claims, finding that LDN works no better than a placebo in reducing pain for women with fibromyalgia. In their double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 99 adult women with fibromyalgia were randomly assigned to receive either an LDN pill or an identical-looking placebo daily for 12 weeks.

The study findings, recently published The Lancet Rheumatology, found a minor improvement in pain intensity for the LDN group, with a similar pain reduction in the placebo group. There were no serious adverse events in either group.

“This study did not show that treatment with low-dose naltrexone was superior to placebo in relieving pain. Our results indicate that low-dose naltrexone might improve memory problems associated with fibromyalgia, and we suggest that future trials investigate this further,” wrote lead author Karin Due Bruun, MD, a researcher in the Pain Center at Odense University Hospital in Denmark.

The Danish study is notable, because placebo-controlled, double-blind studies are considered the gold standard in medical research. Until now, much of the evidence about LDN has been anecdotal or low quality.

In a 2020 review of nearly 800 LDN studies, another research team could find only eight that were high quality enough to meet their criteria for evaluation. Nevertheless, they found that LDN “provides an alternative in medical management of chronic pain disorders.”

A 2019 review by British researchers also found that LDN is safe to use, but recommended that more clinical studies be conducted.

How naltrexone works is not exactly clear. LDN supporters believe the drug modulates the immune system, reduces inflammation and stimulates the production of endorphins, the body's natural painkiller.

In 50mg doses, naltrexone blocks opioid receptors in the brain and decreases the desire to take opiates or alcohol. But in smaller doses of 5mg or less, patients have found LDN to be an effective pain reliever. PNN columnists have shared their positive experiences using LDN to treat everything from interstitial cystitis to Ehlers-Danlos syndrome to fibromyalgia.  

A woman with fibromyalgia tried all sorts of FDA-approved medications to relieve her leg pain, brain fog and depression. None worked, until she tried LDN.   

“After about seven days, my pain lessened,” said Janice Hollander. “[LDN] has completely changed my life. I don’t know that I would be here today if it wasn’t for it. I don’t think I could go for another year in the misery I was in.” 

Naltrexone does cause minor side effects, such as nausea and dizziness, and because it is an opioid antagonist it should not be taken with opioid medication.

Patients interested in trying LDN often encounter doctors who won’t prescribe it off-label. The LDN Research Trust includes a list of LDN-friendly doctors and pharmacies on its website.

Checking the Boxes: Why Therapy Was Not Helpful

By Mia Maysack, PNN Columnist

Living with persistent pain or chronic illness is enough to push anyone to the brink of insanity. I’ve reached out for mental health assistance in the past, and either regretted it or didn’t feel it was much help at all.

I later came to the realization that therapy could only ever be what we make of it, so I decided to release the disappointment from the past and give it another wholehearted try.

I learned that the therapy process, particularly since COVID-19, is a nightmare. The isolation of the pandemic helped us recognize the importance of mental health, along with the fact that there’s a shortage of providers. It’s now nearly impossible to find a therapist.

It’s even more difficult to come across one that is accepting new patients and whatever insurance you might or might not have. I spent the better part of a year researching, making phone calls and being told no, before I finally came across a situation that seemed promising.

After providing extensive documentation exploring every aspect of my life and then playing the waiting game to get the green light from insurance, I was finally able to move forward with scheduling an appointment at a clinic. It would have been many more months before I could be seen in-person, so I settled for a virtual appointment.

I was happy to connect with a provider, who initially seemed warm and caring. Little did I realize how short lived this would be.

During our conversation, we covered the basics. I attempted to explain how anyone who lives the way that I do must experience some form of depression or sadness, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that I always feel that way. I don’t feel a need to label people as “sad” or “depressed,” for I believe there’s a wide spectrum we all exist on. We can allow ourselves to feel sad or anxious in any given moment, without necessarily committing to that experience permanently.

Prior to this therapy session, I’d been participating in a behavioral health program where a provider would call once every few weeks for a momentary check-in. Being that I had no other support at that time, I was thankful for the resource and couldn’t help but imagine what different points in my life would’ve been like had something like that been available then.

I’m under the impression this check-in option was cultivated during the pandemic in an attempt to alleviate the mental health stress that so many of us were having.  It’s more of a band-aid than anything else, but slowing the emotional bleeding can be the difference between life or death for many.

I remember having a pleasant conversation with someone who reached out. We chatted for about a half hour as they listened to some of my health-related goals, then advised me they’d have someone follow up to ensure the plan was proceeding smoothly.  

At the very last second, they requested I complete a survey -- one that I’d done countless times already: the PHQ-9 questionnaire.  It asks how you were feeling in the last two weeks and to rate your experiences on a numeric scale.  Was I tired? Feeling hopeless? Eating enough? Eating too much? Was I thinking of hurting myself?

Ending the phone call on such a note turned an otherwise enjoyable and productive conversation into a traumatic reminder of the ways I’d been struggling. Then the session was over and I was on my own again.

On the next call, I offered feedback -- mentioning the survey should come sooner in the conversation and empower the patient to choose when they’d complete it or even not take it. That should be my right and my choice.

I was advised that the survey was part of the process of getting a diagnosis. The therapist said this wasn’t so much the clinic’s way of doing things, but rather “served insurance purposes.” That rubbed me the wrong way.

Here I was, absolutely desperate for therapy, but instead of receiving actual help, I was reminded once again that the most important thing for a provider is to collect patient data. With a heavy heart, I chose to end my pursuit of counseling. It feels harmful and unsafe to be reminded that “checking the boxes” is prioritized over the quality of human life.

Mia Maysack lives with chronic migraine, cluster headache and fibromyalgia. She is a healthcare reform advocate and founder of Keepin’ Our Heads Up, a support network; Peace & Love, a life coaching practice; and Still We Rise, an organization that seeks to alleviate pain of all kinds.

Lack of Awareness Is Harming People with Scoliosis

By Drs. Sanja Schreiber and Emily Somers

Cael was a typical 15-year-old — until the discovery of an already advanced abnormal curvature of his spine.

“I felt like the Hunchback of Notre Dame,” Cael told CBC News, recalling the emotionally draining and gruesome two-year wait for spinal surgery during which his curve progressed to a whopping 108 degrees.

Scoliosis is an abnormal twisting and curving of the spine that can develop at any age, but mostly occurs during rapid growth spurts in children, and as part of spine aging in adults over the age of 60.

Of all types of scoliosis in children, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most prevalent, accounting for as many as nine in 10 cases and impacting up to one in 20 adolescents globally. On the other end of the age spectrum, a staggering two-thirds of older adults are also affected.

In clinical care, research and education related to scoliosis, disparities persist worldwide. Despite its widespread prevalence, scoliosis often goes undiagnosed, or has delayed diagnosis as in Cael’s case. It also receives limited attention in clinical and public health education, leading to significant gaps in health care.

This general lack of awareness has serious implications for thousands of people like Cael.

Gaps in Scoliosis Care

In the United States, fewer than half of states legislate school-based scoliosis screening in children. Even worse, Canada discontinued screening back in 1979 because it was not considered cost-effective.

Pediatricians’ screening practices vary, and some cases of scoliosis in children are only discovered when an unrelated chest X-ray reveals a curved spine. With about 30 per cent of cases being hereditary, parents may not recognize the signs early on.

The recommended care in North America involves bracing for mild to moderate curves (25° to 45°) and surgery for curves exceeding 45°. Shockingly, 32 per cent of Canadian children, like Cael, face delayed referrals, discovering significant curves when they finally see specialists.

Despite documented success in managing scoliosis through early screening, exercise rehabilitation and brace treatment, global health-care education often neglects this condition.

The general lack of global awareness leaves physicians, nurses and other practitioners unaware of effective treatments and referral processes, contributing to the misunderstanding and under-treatment of patients. Consequently, when children with scoliosis eventually reach specialists for care, they may encounter challenges navigating the health-care system as they transition into adulthood.

Sex Disparities

It is unclear why adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affects mainly girls. The more severe the curve, the more likely the patient is female.

Due to their specific biology, females also face a five-fold higher risk of progressive deformities and are 10 times more likely, compared to males, to require surgery.

Despite generally uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries, women with scoliosis often face difficulties receiving pain control during labour, with higher epidural failure rates.

Moreover, they often suffer pregnancy-related back pain, and their spine curvature may worsen after pregnancy.

Healthcare Barriers

Healthcare access in the U.S. is influenced by a range of factors including race, income and health insurance coverage.

Patients with better insurance plans tend to seek pediatric orthopedic care at a younger age. Those with public insurance tend to have worse spine curvatures by the time they reach a scoliosis specialist; this is particularly striking among Black patients with public insurance, who are 67 per cent less likely to be diagnosed at a stage early enough for effective brace treatment compared to Black patients with private insurance.

While Canada’s health-care system covers spinal fusion for severe scoliosis, the lack of a national insurance program in the U.S. leads to varying out-of-pocket expenses for patients.

Those without insurance often cannot afford surgery at all.

But even with Canada’s universal coverage, patients typically wait an entire year for surgery due to a shortage of providers. Because of regional variability in resources such as access to spinal surgeons, funding and specialized facilities, some kids, like Cael, wait even longer, experiencing physical, emotional and psychological burdens, while their curves get progressively worse.

Delayed surgery in Canada cost the health-care system $44.6 million due to more complex surgeries, extended hospital stays, readmission and re-operation rates.

Lack of Research

Ongoing gender disparities in the healthcare workforce and lack of research funding for this female-predominant condition continue to hamper effective action.

Fewer than five per cent of spinal surgeons identify as women. Glass-ceiling effects surround women surgeons in this male-dominated culture, perpetuating gendered training environments, being held to higher standards and earning lower wages. The dearth of senior women role models and mentors is a further barrier for career advancement and retention.

Furthermore, research funding for diseases, such as scoliosis, that mainly affect females has historically lagged far behind funding for male-predominant diseases. Improving workforce diversity is an important facet of addressing health disparities and shaping research agendas.

Inequities abound in scoliosis care and research. The impact of lack of awareness and delayed care extends beyond physical challenges. The patient and their family suffer emotionally, incurring significant financial burden while fearing the future.

The message is clear, we must do better for this underserved population.

Sanja Schreiber, PhD, is an Adjunct Professor of Physical Therapy at the University of Alberta and the Owner/Director of Curvy Spine, a specialized clinic for treating structural spinal disorders and training physiotherapists in scoliosis rehabilitation.

Emily Somers, PhD, is an epidemiologist specializing in immune-mediated and musculoskeletal diseases. She also directs the Interdisciplinary Research & Team Science Program at the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation and is republished with permission.

‘Safe Supply’ of Rx Opioids Saved Lives in British Columbia

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Prescribing opioids and other medications to people with substance use disorders significantly reduces their risk of dying, according to a large new study in British Columbia. The findings add weight to efforts to create a “safe supply” of legal medications for patients at risk of an overdose from increasingly toxic street drugs.

Vancouver, British Columbia was the first major North American city to be hit by a wave of overdoses involving illicit fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid. That led Vancouver to become a laboratory for harm reduction programs and safe supply sites offering prescription opioids and injectable heroin to drug users.  

How effective have those programs been?

A study by the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, recently published in the British Medical Journal, found that prescribing opioids, stimulants and anti-anxiety medication to nearly 6,000 drug users dramatically reduced their risk of death.

The Risk Mitigation Guide (RMG) program was initially launched in early 2020 to help drug users going through withdrawal while isolated by the COVID-19 quarantine. A year later, the program was extended, allowing doctors and nurse practitioners to prescribe hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, benzodiazepines and stimulants to drug users.

People who were given an initial dose of prescription opioids had a 61% lower risk of death from any cause the following week, and were 55% less likely to die of a drug overdose.

The protective effect of a safe supply increased as more doses were provided. Drug users who received four or more days of opioids were 91% less likely to die from any cause and 89% less likely to die from an overdose.

"We saw a profound impact on reduction in somebody's overdose death risk the week after they picked up these drugs, to a degree that is really surprising and has enormous potential," co-author Paxton Bach, MD, an addiction medicine specialist, told CBC News. "This paper is the strongest evidence we have so far, by a large margin, supporting the idea that this can be an effective strategy for reducing overdose death risk."

But critics of safe supply programs say they don’t really reduce drug abuse. An investigation last year by the National Post found that hydromorphone pills given to drug users in Vancouver were being sold to other addicts, with the sellers then using the money to buy more potent street drugs that were often laced with fentanyl.

A new study in JAMA Internal Medicine also found that opioid-related hospitalizations rose sharply in British Columbia after safe supply programs were launched there, although there was no significant change in overdose deaths. The spike in hospitalizations may have been due to more potent street drugs and counterfeit pills on the black market.

Since a public health emergency was declared in British Columbia in 2016, over 13,000 people have died from drug overdoses. A 2020 analysis found that only about 2% of the B.C. opioid-related deaths were caused by prescription opioids alone. The other overdoses mainly involved illicit fentanyl and other street drugs.  

FDA Finds ‘Credible Scientific Support’ for Marijuana as Pain Reliever

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

It took a lawsuit to prompt its release, but the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has finally made public a lengthy FDA review explaining why it thinks marijuana should be rescheduled as a Schedule III controlled substance. Such a move would make it legal under federal law for marijuana to be used for medically approved purposes, such as pain relief.

The FDA review was completed last August, nearly a year after it was requested by President Biden. But the 252-page review was not released until Friday, after a lawsuit was filed by two pro-cannabis lawyers when HHS didn’t respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

Medical marijuana is already legal in 38 states, but cannabis remains classified as a Schedule I substance by the Drug Enforcement Administration, making its sale or use illegal under federal law. The DEA is expected to make its decision on rescheduling soon.

The FDA looked at seven potential medical uses of cannabis: pain, anorexia, anxiety, epilepsy, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), nausea, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

After reviewing clinical studies of cannabis, and the views of academic and professional medical societies, the FDA said they found “mixed findings of effectiveness.” The strongest evidence was for pain relief, anorexia and nausea.

“The available data indicate that there is some credible scientific support for the use of marijuana in the treatment of pain.”

— FDA review

“The largest evidence base for effectiveness exists for marijuana use within the pain indication (in particular, neuropathic pain),” the FDA said. “On balance, the available data indicate that there is some credible scientific support for the use of marijuana in the treatment of pain, anorexia related to a medical condition, and nausea and vomiting, with varying degrees of support and consistency of findings.”

Perhaps just as importantly, the FDA found no evidence of “unacceptably high safety risks” when marijuana was used therapeutically. That is a key finding for marijuana to be rescheduled by the DEA. The risk of marijuana being used nonmedically was also low, compared to substances like alcohol, heroin, cocaine, prescription opioids and anti-anxiety drugs.

“The rank order of the comparators in terms of greatest adverse consequences typically places heroin, benzodiazepines and/or cocaine in the first or immediately subsequent positions, with marijuana in a lower place in the ranking, especially when a utilization adjustment is calculated. For overdose deaths, marijuana is always in the lowest ranking among comparator drugs,” FDA said.

“These evaluations demonstrate that there is consistency across databases, across substances, and over time that although abuse of marijuana produces clear evidence of a risk to public health, that risk is relatively lower than that posed by most other comparator drugs.”

The FDA said the “vast majority” of professional medical organizations do not recommend marijuana, but they don’t specifically recommend against it either. The lone exception is the American Psychiatric Association, which warns that long-term use of marijuana can worsen psychiatric conditions, such as paranoia and hallucinations.

Reclassifying marijuana as a Schedule III substance – in the same category as codeine and ketamine – would certainly be historic, but it won’t resolve the many differences between federal and state regulation of cannabis.

Under federal law, legal access to Schedule III substances requires a prescription from a licensed doctor that is dispensed from a licensed pharmacy. Medical marijuana products would also have to go through the FDA’s lengthy and costly clinical trial process to assess their safety and effectiveness. Even if they pass that test, they would only be approved by FDA for certain conditions.  

Pain Patients Feel Abandoned by U.S. Healthcare System

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Many pain patients feel abandoned by the U.S. healthcare system and say it’s increasingly difficult to find a doctor or obtain opioid analgesics, according to a large new survey by Pain News Network. Some patients have turned to other substances – both legal and illegal -- for pain relief, and almost a third have contemplated suicide.

Nearly 3,000 pain patients or their caregivers participated in PNN’s online survey in the final weeks of 2023.

Over 90% of those with opioid prescriptions said they faced delays or problems last year getting their prescriptions filled at a pharmacy. Nearly a third were hoarding opioids because of fear they’ll not be able to get them in the future. And over 40% rated the quality of their pain care as “bad” or “very bad.”

“I’ve given up hope of getting help for chronic, severe pain in this country. I’m planning to move to where I can receive humane treatment,” one patient told us.

“The hoops in which I have had to jump through to get the minimal help that I have gotten throughout the years is ridiculous,” said another. “I have a very extensive and very well documented history of mental and physical trauma, but I am still treated as a drug seeker. I am currently unable to get any form of medication.”

“Every pain patient worries, from one month to the next, if their doctor will cut them off opioids or force taper them to such low levels that there is NO pain relief,” another patient wrote.

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CURRENT QUALITY OF YOUR PAIN CARE?

“I’ve spent the last 8 years explaining my inadequate pain control and lack of sleep that has fallen on deaf ears. I’ve tried so many different doctors and now feel like no one cares at all. Honestly feel as though they would rather see me die and be rid of me,” said another.

‘Impossible to Find Help’

About one in every four patients said they were tapered to a lower dose or taken off opioids — but only a small number were referred to addiction treatment. Less than one percent of those who stopped opioid treatment said it improved their pain and quality of life.

One in five patients couldn’t find a doctor to treat their pain. Many were abandoned by a physician or had a doctor who retired from clinical practice.   

• 20% Unable to find doctor willing to treat pain

• 14% Doctor retired or left their practice  

• 12% Abandoned or discharged by a doctor

• 27% Tapered to a lower dose or taken off opioids

• 3%   Received a referral for addiction treatment

• 0.6% Stopped opioids & pain and quality of life improved

“My primary retired. Then my rheumatologist moved to another state. Now most doctors don't prescribe and it's impossible to find help,” a patient wrote.

“Every pain management office in my area were nothing but nightmares waiting to happen. And every person I talked to… were solely concerned with either getting people off of pain medication or reducing the amount of medicine by over half,” said another.

“Doctors I talked to said they felt like they had a gun to their head and that they are being watched, so they won't prescribe or prescribe very little,” a patient wrote.

“My insurance just capped opioids to 7 days a month, so I have to choose whether to buy the other 3 weeks and cut back on my food budget, or take to my bed for 3 weeks a month,” said another.

“I am unable to find a new doctor to treat pain. A couple of years ago I was tapered from a previously working amount of pain med, so now I have daily severe pain and too many sleepless nights from pain. But the doc doesn't care. It seems my clinic system only sees me as an addict,” wrote another pain patient.

Risky Choices

With pain care increasingly difficult to find, nearly a third of patients said they considered suicide in the past year because their pain was so severe. Others adopted risky behaviors, such as hoarding opioid medication, obtaining opioids from another person, buying illicit substances off the black market, or using alcohol, cannabis and other substances for pain relief.    

• 29% Considered suicide

• 32% Hoarded opioid medication

• 30% Used cannabis for pain relief

• 14% Used alcohol for pain relief

• 11% Used kratom for pain relief

• 11% Obtained prescription opioids from friend, family or black market

•  4%  Used heroin, illicit fentanyl or illegal substance for pain relief

“I was taken off my prescription opioid twice and attempted suicide twice because the other prescriptions were not effective,” one patient told us.

“I have a therapist that has been helpful, because I have considered taking my life. He is concerned that I'm not getting adequate pain relief,” said another.

“Since suicide is against my faith, I prayed for death,” one patient wrote. 

“I know so many people that have stopped going to doctors and started buying heroin off the street. They say it’s easier and cheaper,” another patient said.

“The obscenely high cost of medical marijuana made me suffer so much financially that I have been unable to make use of the compassion center’s offerings,” wrote another patient. “Why on earth do we let plants be illegal in the first place, then let them be sold for so much money that they are almost impossible to afford on a disability income?”

“We desperately need to get away from the denial of opioids as a way to deal with this crisis. So far, the results of these laws on opioids have been an abject failure. Deaths have not been reduced, but actually increased due to chronic pain patients having to resort to suicide,” said another.

“I hope that all the people who are in charge of this will one day feel what I do and have some grasp of the pain situation people are forced to live through. They take care of their dogs and cats better than human beings,” a patient said.

“I have considered suicide multiple times over the past few years. These laws, while meant to curb illicit abuse of these medications, are harming legitimate patients like myself,” another patient wrote. “The worst part is that, for the time being, it looks like things are going to get much, much worse for me and the millions of others like me.” 

PNN’s online survey was conducted from November 13 to December 31, 2023. A total of 2,961 U.S. pain patients or caregivers participated. We’ll be releasing more results in the coming days.